The Case against Experience Rating in Unemployment Compensation. Richard A. Lester , Charles V. Kidd

1940 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-617
Author(s):  
Charles A. Myers
1945 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
Emerson P. Schmidt

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-434
Author(s):  
Audrey Guo ◽  
Andrew C. Johnston

Economists have contributed important theoretical and empirical findings to the study of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, but a deliberate study of the effect of UI taxation’s unique structure remains undone. We summarize available evidence on UI taxation, describe the history and institutions of experience rating, and outline important lines of inquiry for future work. As unemployment has risen, so has the need for a body of policy-relevant knowledge about the function and financing of UI systems.


ILR Review ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
William Papier ◽  
Clinton Spivey

1939 ◽  
Vol 34 (208) ◽  
pp. 775
Author(s):  
Harry Weiss ◽  
Herman Feldman ◽  
Donald M. Smith

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha W. Rees

Much has been written about the costs—and benefits--of migration--in terms of the costs to the US (or receiving regions) and of the benefits to migrants. Massey (2005) concludes that because (Mexican) immigrants pay taxes, they are not a drain on public services. In fact, migrants are less likely to use public services, and pay taxes for services they don’t use. Almost two-thirds have Social Security taxes withheld, only 10% have sent a child to public schools, and under 5% or have used food stamps, welfare, or unemployment compensation. They also pay sales taxes. In terms of criminality, Rumbaut and Ewing (2007) refute the myth that migrants bring crime. They find that Mexican immigrant men have a lower rate of incarceration (0.7%) than US born Latinos (5.9%) or for US born males (3.5%).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document