scholarly journals Longitudinal Assessment of Cytomegalovirus (CMV)–Specific Immune Responses in Liver Transplant Recipients at High Risk for Late CMV Disease

2007 ◽  
Vol 195 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna La Rosa ◽  
Ajit P. Limaye ◽  
Aparna Krishnan ◽  
Jeff Longmate ◽  
Don J. Diamond
2000 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S407
Author(s):  
Michael de Vera ◽  
Gregory A. Smallwood ◽  
Laurel Davis ◽  
Andrie Stieber ◽  
Heffron Thomas

Author(s):  
Mohsen Aliakbarian ◽  
Rozita Khodashahi ◽  
Mahin Ghorban Sabbagh ◽  
Hamid Reza Naderi ◽  
Mandana Khodashahi ◽  
...  

Background: Transplant recipients are at high risk for severe Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Transplant recipients are immune-compromised individuals at high risk for severe infection. This study aimed to compare the presentations and outcomes of liver and kidney transplant recipients who were infected with COVID-19 in the Iranian population. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Imam Reza and Montaserieh Hospitals affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, between 2020 and 2021. In general, 52 patients were selected and divided into two groups of the kidney (n=28) and liver (n=24) transplantation. Two groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical findings. Results: Of 52 patients, severe COVID-19 infection was reported in 61% of the patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of symptoms, except for cough (χ2=8.09; P=0.004), clinical condition, and laboratory symptoms, except for creatinine (Z=14; P<0.005), alkaline phosphatase (Z=4.55; P=0.03), total bilirubin (Z=8.93; P=0.03), and partial thromboplastin time (Z=5.97; P=0.01). There was no relationship between the outcome and the use of immunosuppressive medications (P>0.05). All patients with kidney transplantation survived, while two cases in the liver transplantation group failed to survive (χ2=2.42; P=0.11). Conclusion: The mortality rate was higher in the liver transplant recipients, compared to the patients who underwent kidney transplantation.


1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Hooks ◽  
Carl A. Perlino ◽  
J. Michael Henderson ◽  
William J. Millikan ◽  
Michael H. Kutner

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease with the administration of muromonab CD-3 (OKT-3) in patients undergoing liver transplant; specifically, to assess the risk of OKT-3 use as an agent for rejection prophylaxis and as an agent for therapy of rejection. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records. STUDY POPULATION: 83 liver transplant recipients (43 men, 40 women) with a mean age of 41.5 years (range 16–62). DATA EXTRACTION: The medical record for each liver transplant recipient was reviewed and analyzed for the following variables: (1) preoperative recipient CMV serology, (2) donor CMV serology, (3) incidence of invasive CMV disease, (4) administration of OKT-3, (5) postoperative administration time of OKT-3, and (6) the relationship between the administration of OKT-3 and the prevalence of invasive CMV disease. RESULTS: OKT-3 was administered to 34 of 83 (40.9 percent) liver recipients, 7 of whom received OKT-3 as rejection prophylaxis; the remainder received OKT-3 as rejection rescue. All patients received OKT-3 5 mg iv for 14 days. Seventeen of the 34 patients receiving OKT-3 (50 percent) developed invasive CMV disease; 58.8 percent of the patients (20/34) receiving OKT-3 were given the agent within the first 14 postoperative days. Sixteen of these 20 patients (80 percent) developed invasive CMV disease. One of 14 patients (7.1 percent) who received OKT-3 after the first 14 postoperative days developed invasive CMV disease. Of those patients 94 percent (16/17) received OKT-3 in the first 14 postoperative days. This prevalence differed significantly from those receiving OKT-3 after the 14th postoperative day and those who did not receive OKT-3 at any time during their hospital course. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who received early administration of OKT-3 in our study had a greater risk of invasive CMV disease than did those who received OKT-3 later in the hospital course.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S641-S641
Author(s):  
Oscar Fernández ◽  
Jennifer Cuellar-Rodríguez ◽  
Jose Sifuentes-Osornio ◽  
Ignacio García ◽  
Pablo Belaunzarán

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important opportunistic pathogen in liver transplant recipients (LTR). Risk of invasive disease is determined by CMV donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus, immunosuppression, and use of antiviral prophylaxis. Viral replication kinetics that can predict the development of CMV disease in transplant recipients are a high maximal viral load (VL) and a fast replication velocity. At our institution LTR at intermediate risk for CMV disease (CMV D/R+) are managed following a preemptive therapy algorithm (the pre-established cutoff for treatment initiation is 4,000 IU/mL). The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the incidence of early CMV disease in CMV D/R+ LTR. Secondary endpoints were to calculate the period of maximal VL and viral kinetic parameters. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of CMV D/R+ LTR. Patients were followed for 6 months after transplantation. We calculated the incidence of CMV disease. Viral kinetic parameters calculated were the VL duplication time (Td) and the basic reproductive number (R0). For the assessment of viral kinetics we used the maximal VL of 10 patients who had a VL determined within the previous week. Results Forty CMV D/R+ LTR were included. The median age was 52 years, 65% were women. The mean MELD score was 18, 83% of patients had decompensated cirrhosis. No patient developed CMV disease during the first 6 months after LT. Nineteen patients (47%) had CMV DNAemia, but only 8 (20%) required antiviral therapy. The highest VLs were observed during the second month after transplant. The median duplication time was 2.14 days. The median R0 was 1.46. Conclusion Although limited by our sample size, our algorithm appears useful for discriminating the patients who need antiviral treatment from those who will only have asymptomatic DNAemia. The study population VL, Td and R0 behave as described by other groups, which emphasizes the need for frequent monitoring. This is a challenge for CMV prevention in resource-limited countries. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1811-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M Rabkin ◽  
H.R Rosen ◽  
C.L Corless ◽  
S.L Orloff ◽  
A.J Olyaei

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document