Acute Emergence of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica Infection among Mechanically Ventilated Patients in a Long-Term Acute Care Facility

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kingsley N. Weaver ◽  
Roderick C. Jones ◽  
Rosemary Albright ◽  
Yolanda Thomas ◽  
Carlos H. Zambrano ◽  
...  

Objective.To describe an outbreak of infection associated with an infrequently implicated pathogen, Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, in an increasingly prominent setting for health care of severely ill patients, the long-term acute care hospital.Design.Outbreak investigation.Setting.Long-term acute care hospital with 55 patients, most of whom were mechanically ventilated.Methods.We defined a case as E. meningoseptica isolated from any patient specimen source from December 2007 through April 2008, conducted an investigation of case patients, obtained environmental specimens, and performed microbiologic testing.Results.Nineteen patients had E. meningoseptica infection, and 8 died. All case patients had been admitted with respiratory failure that required mechanical ventilation. Among the 8 individuals who died, the time from collection of the first specimen positive for E. meningoseptica to death ranged from 6 to 43 days (median, 16 days). Environmental sampling was performed on 106 surfaces; E. meningoseptica was isolated from only one swab. Three related pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were identified in patient isolates; the environmental isolate yielded a fourth, unrelated pattern.Conclusion.Long-term acute care hospitals with mechanically ventilated patients could serve as an important transmission setting for E. meningoseptica. This multidrug-resistant bacterium could pose additional risk when patients are transferred between long-term acute care hospitals and acute care hospitals.

CHEST Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 902A
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dixon ◽  
Michael Martinez ◽  
Frans van Wagenberg ◽  
Ying Fang ◽  
Cecilia Benz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Saad ◽  
Franco A. Laghi ◽  
John Brofman ◽  
Nidhi S. Undevia ◽  
Hameeda Shaikh

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205031211667092
Author(s):  
Evan S. Cole ◽  
Carla Willis ◽  
William C Rencher ◽  
Mei Zhou

Objectives: Because most research on long-term acute care hospitals has focused on Medicare, the objective of this research is to describe the Georgia Medicaid population who received care at a long-term acute care hospital, the type and volume of services provided by these long-term acute care hospitals, and the costs and outcomes of these services. For those with select respiratory conditions, we descriptively compare costs and outcomes to those of patients who received care for the same services in acute care hospitals. Methods: We describe Georgia Medicaid recipients admitted to a long-term acute care hospital between 2011 and 2012. We compare them to a population of Georgia Medicaid recipients admitted to an acute care hospital for one of five respiratory diagnosis-related groups. Measurements used include patient descriptive information, admissions, diagnosis-related groups, length of stay, place of discharge, 90-day episode costs, readmissions, and patient risk scores. Results: We found that long-term acute care hospital admissions for Medicaid patients were fairly low (470 90-day episodes) and restricted to complex cases. We also found that the majority of long-term acute care hospital patients were blind or disabled (71.2%). Compared to patients who stayed at an acute care hospital, long-term acute care hospital patients had higher average risk scores (13.1 versus 9.0), lengths of stay (61 versus 38 days), costs (US$143,898 versus US$115,056), but fewer discharges to the community (28.4% versus 51.8%). Conclusion: We found that the Medicaid population seeking care at long-term acute care hospitals is markedly different than the Medicare populations described in other long-term acute care hospital studies. In addition, our study revealed that Medicaid patients receiving select respiratory care at a long-term acute care hospital were distinct from Medicaid patients receiving similar care at an acute care hospital. Our findings suggest that state Medicaid programs should carefully consider reimbursement policies for long-term acute care hospitals, including bundled payments that cover both the original hospitalization and long-term acute care hospital admission.


2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 2112-2119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil N. Makam ◽  
Oanh Kieu Nguyen ◽  
Lei Xuan ◽  
Michael E. Miller ◽  
Ethan A. Halm

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 656-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Hun Kim ◽  
Diana Toy ◽  
Robert R. Muder

Background.Controversy exists over whetherClostridium difficileinfection (CDI) commonly occurs in long-term care facility residents who have not been recently transferred from an acute care hospital.Objective.To assess the incidence and outcome of CDI in a long-term care facility.Methods.Retrospective cohort study in a 262-bed long-term care Veterans Affairs facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for the period January 2004 through June 2010. CDI was identified by positive stoolC. difficiletoxin assay and acute diarrhea. Patients were categorized as hospital-associated CDI (HACDI) or long-term care facility–associated CDI (LACDI) and followed for 6 months.Results.The annual rate of CDI varied between 0.11 and 0.23 per 1,000 resident-days for HACDI patients and between 0.04 and 0.28 per 1,000 resident-days for LACDI patients. We identified 162 patients, 96 patients (59.3%) with HACDI and 66 patients (40.7%) with LACDI. Median age was 74 and 77 years, respectively, for HACDI and LACDI (P= .055) patients. There were more patients with at least 1 relapse of CDI during 6 months of follow up in LACDI patients (32/66, 48.5%) than in HACDI patients (28/96, 29.2%;P= .009). Logistic regression showed that ages of at least 75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–5.07;P= .033), more than 2 transfers to an acute care hospital (OR, 7.88; 95% CI, 1.88–32.95;P= .005), and LACDI (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.41–7.05;P= .005) were associated with relapse of CDI.Conclusions.Forty percent of CDI cases were acquired within the long-term care facility, indicating a substantial degree of transmission. Optimal strategies to prevent CDI in the long-term care facility are needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Berna Demiralp ◽  
Lane Koenig ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Samuel Soltoff ◽  
John Votto

Abstract Background Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) treat mechanical ventilator patients who are difficult to wean and expected to be on mechanical ventilator for a prolonged period. However, there are varying views on who should be transferred to LTACHs and when they should be transferred. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between length of stay in a short-term acute care hospital (STACH) after endotracheal intubation (time to LTACH) and weaning success and mortality for ventilated patients discharged to an LTACH. Methods Using 2014–2015 Medicare claims and assessment data, we identified patients who had an endotracheal intubation in STACH and transferred to an LTACH with prolonged mechanical ventilation (defined as 96 or more consecutive hours on a ventilator). We controlled for age, gender, STACH stay procedures and diagnoses, Elixhauser comorbid conditions, and LTACH quality characteristics. We used instrumental variable estimation to account for unobserved patient and provider characteristics. Results The study cohort included 13,622 LTACH cases with median time to LTACH of 18 days. The unadjusted ventilator weaning rate at LTACH was 51.7%, and unadjusted 90-day mortality rate was 43.7%. An additional day spent in STACH after intubation is associated with 11.6% reduction in the odds of weaning, representing a 2.5 percentage point reduction in weaning rate at 18 days post endotracheal intubation. We found no statistically significant relationship between time to LTACH and the odds of 90-day mortality. Conclusions Discharging ventilated patients earlier from STACH to LTACH is associated with higher weaning probability for LTACH patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation. Our findings suggest that delaying ventilated patients’ discharge to LTACH may negatively influence the patients’ chances of being weaned from the ventilator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document