Inner Asia and the Spatial Politics of Empire: Archaeology, Mobility, and Cultural Contact. William Honeychurch. New York: Springer, 2014, 321 pp. $143.20, cloth. ISBN 978-1-4939-1814-0.

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-556
Author(s):  
Lynne M. Rouse
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Ivan Peshkov

The borderline territory serves a double purpose, being simultaneously zones of cultural contact and cultural barriers–administrative and often civilizational. This ambivalence frequently affects borderline area inhabitants turning them into hostages of border management regimes and outside projections concerning their cultural and civilizational status, and the authenticity of forms of their culture representation. In the case of Birobidzhan, we are dealing with an absolutely modern project of creating ethnic territoriality without reference to the historical context and far from the places of traditional settlement of the Jewish population. The implementation of this project put the Jewish settlers at the center of a complex process of border management and securitization of the border areas. The factors of border and “remoteness” are largely underestimated in Birobidzhan studies. The article fills this niche, emphasizing the spatial aspects of the implementation of the “anti-Zionist utopia” and its complex relationship with previous models of territoriality in the region and local inhabitants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document