scholarly journals Willingness to Pay for Clean Air: Evidence from Air Purifier Markets in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 1627-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Ito ◽  
Shuang Zhang
2020 ◽  
Vol 261 ◽  
pp. 110174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Guo ◽  
Anyi Wang ◽  
Alice Tianbo Zhang

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1956
Author(s):  
Do-Hyun Kim ◽  
Min-Soo Kim ◽  
Muhammad Adil Khan ◽  
Hee-Je Kim

Corona discharge technology is used widely for air purification in laboratory experiments and industry. On the other hand, corona discharge technology has the disadvantage of requiring large-sized electrodes. Therefore, research is needed to reduce the size of the electrodes. In this study, circular hole aluminum electrodes and an air purifier system were designed to reduce the size of the electrodes. Several sets of power conversions were performed to generate a corona discharge. The system consisted of a half bridge inverter, step-up transformer, and Cockcroft Walton circuit. The range of input and output voltages was 30–70 V and 20–25 kV, respectively. A corona discharge was generated by the output voltage. The system could remove smoke in less time with a combination of 13 kHz and an electrode with a hole diameter of 0.2 cm than with the other combinations. The electrode hole diameter affected the removal time of species such as hydrogen carbon hydrogen oxygen (HCHO, formaldehyde), total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), and fine dust, which was confirmed by laboratory experiments. Mathematical derivation and experiments were carried out to prove the validity of the approach; the Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) index was 480 μm/m3.


Author(s):  
Haiyong Zhang ◽  
Sanqin Mao ◽  
Xinyu Wang

The Smog Free Tower (SFT) in the city of Xi’an, China, is the world’s first outdoor architecture that uses solar energy and filtration technology to purify polluted air. It provides a unique opportunity to explore residents’ willingness to pay for air quality and their related behaviors. Drawing on data collected after the establishment of the SFT, this paper reveals the characteristics of changes in people’s willingness to pay for clean air. We found that, prior to the release of an assessment report on the SFT, housing prices had an inverted U-shaped relationship with the distance to the SFT, which indicated people tended to purchase houses a certain distance away from the SFT. The threshold value of distance was inversely related to the greening ratio of the residential area. However, after the publication of the experimental report on the SFT, housing prices decreased as the distance to the SFT increased, indicating the closer the house was to the SFT, the more likely people were to buy it. These changes confirmed that people are willing to pay for clean air. The convenience of transportation had a significant moderating effect on the willingness to pay for clean air, however. In other words, people may buy houses with lower air quality if they have better transportation accessibility. The findings of this paper may have practical implications for environmental governance, urban planning, residential satisfaction, and real estate market regulation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 251-283
Author(s):  
Wenquan Liang ◽  
Ran Song ◽  
Christopher Timmins

AbstractEconomistsgenerallyemploytwo ‘revealed preference’ approaches to measure households’ preferences for non-market amenities—the hedonic and equilibrium sorting models. The conventional hedonic model assumes free mobility across space. Violation of this assumption can bias the estimates of household willingness to pay for local amenities. Mobility constraints are more easily handled by the sorting framework. In this chapter, we examine the role of migration costs in household residential sorting and apply these two models to estimate the willingness to pay for clean air in the USAand China. Our results demonstrate that ignoring mobility costs in spatial sorting will underestimate the implicit value of non-market amenities in both countries. Such a downward bias is larger in developing countries, such as China, where migration costs are higher.


2019 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 188-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Freeman ◽  
Wenquan Liang ◽  
Ran Song ◽  
Christopher Timmins
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document