The Military Life of Field-Marshal George First Marquess Townshend, 1724–1807. By Lt. Colonel C. V. F. Townshend, C.B. (London: John Murray. 1901. Pp. vii, 340.)

Keyword(s):  
Traditio ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 27-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Magennis

Among the saints celebrated by the major vernacular Anglo-Saxon hagiographer Ælfric of Eynsham, one interesting group that has not received much scholarly attention is his warrior saints. In his lives of these saints Ælfric the monk, who has abjured violence, proclaims the spiritual achievements of men who have been military leaders and of ordinary soldiers serving in the ranks. The most famous of Ælfric's soldiers, St. Martin, was an unwilling one, but others commended by him were not unhappy to embrace the military life, even indeed when serving under pagans. Warrior saints were a distinctive and popular class of saints in the earlier Christian Mediterranean world. In the writings of Ælfric, as in Anglo-Saxon hagiography generally, they are a small group, but they are a group that illustrates strikingly Ælfric's approach to writing about saints, and study of them helps to throw light on the work he intended vernacular hagiography to perform. Part of that work, as argued below, was to provide ideologically suitable spiritual heroes for the faithful. But how should the potentially problematic group of warrior saints be presented, whose lives combine sanctity and violence and whose exploits might have disconcerting associations with the world of secular heroism?


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Young-Joo Jung ◽  
Mi-Young Roh ◽  
Hye-Young Kim ◽  
Yi-Sub Kwak

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Cooper ◽  
Nick Caddick ◽  
Lauren Godier ◽  
Alex Cooper ◽  
Matt Fossey

In this article, we employ the theoretical framework and concepts of Pierre Bourdieu to examine the notion of “transition” from military to civilian life for U.K. Armed Forces personnel. We put Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, capital, and field to work in highlighting key differences between military and civilian life. The use of social theory allows us to describe the cultural legacy of military life and how this may influence the posttransition course of veterans’ lives. There may be positive and negative transition outcomes for service personnel when moving into civilian life, and by applying Bourdieu’s theoretical concepts, we explain how such outcomes can be understood. We suggest that the “rules” are different in military environments compared to civilian ones and that service personnel must navigate a complex cultural transition when moving between environments. There are numerous and significant implications—including policy applications—from understanding transition through a Bourdieusian lens, and these are highlighted throughout.


1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Willerd R. Fann ◽  
Christopher Duffy
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Thomas Krämer-Badoni ◽  
Roland Wakenhut

1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Boëne

Central to the study of ‘armed forces and society’, whether the approach be that of sociology, political science or legal doctrine, is the question of how unique the military really is—and ought to be. Over the last four decades or so, a number of authors have evinced keen interest in, and written more or less extensively on such matters as the objective, normative and subjective dimensions of military life, functional, structural and cultural features of military organization, civil-military relations, and the patterns of long-term change affecting them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document