X-ray Compton profile of lithium in low momentum transfer region

1981 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Suzuki ◽  
H Nagasawa
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1741-1755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. A. KHAN ◽  
MINITA SINGH

Working within the framework of Coulomb modified correlation expansion of the Glauber amplitude, we analyse the elastic scattering of ~1 GeV protons on 4 He , 12 C , 16 O and 40 Ca nuclei. Emphasis has been put on the use of different parametrizations of the basic (input) NN amplitude, which provide equivalently good accounts of the elastic NN scattering observables up to the available momentum transfer region. Using realistic form factors for target nuclei, it is found that the proton-nucleus collisions could provide a test to know which is the better choice of the NN amplitude. The analysis also considers the possibility of extracting some additional information about the matter density distributions.


2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Bosak ◽  
Michael Krisch ◽  
Irmengard Fischer ◽  
Simo Huotari ◽  
Giulio Monaco

Author(s):  
P. Suortti ◽  
T. Buslaps ◽  
M. DiMichiel ◽  
V. Honkimäki ◽  
U. Lienert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 340-341
Author(s):  
Peter Miller

Quantitative analysis in the TEM by EELS or EDXS depends on the K-factor method in which uniform ionization, independent of specimen orientation and thickness, is assumed. This assumption is of limited validity for crystals, where channeling of the electron wave ψ affects the ionization rate as observed in both energy loss and X-ray signals. Both EELS and EDXS are sensitive to changes in ψψ*near the atomic sites, and this variation as a function of crystal orientation forms the basis for ALCHEMI. Simultaneously recorded EELS and EDXS spectra were used to monitor changes in Cu/Ba ratio from YBaCu-oxides using L2,3/M4,5 ionization edges or K/L X-rays respectively. Although the acceptance aperture for EELS (11 mrad at 300 keV) may not be sufficiently large to mask double-channeling effects, it is small enough that momentum transfer is sufficiently limited to enhance derealization. Thus it is expected that the EELS signal should be less sensitive to crystal orientation than EDXS (an estimate of impact parameters yields 0.73 and 0.61 Å for the Ba and Cu energy loss signals, reducing to 0.06 and 0.04 Å respectively for X-ray emissions).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document