scholarly journals Monte-Carlo model development for evaluation of current clinical target volume definition for heterogeneous and hypoxic glioblastoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 3407-3426 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Moghaddasi ◽  
E Bezak ◽  
W Harriss-Phillips
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-69
Author(s):  
Alessandra Huscher ◽  
Dina Santus ◽  
Alberto Soregaroli ◽  
Stefano Mutti ◽  
Gabriele Levrini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 773-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Armstrong ◽  
J. Ward ◽  
N.M. Hughes ◽  
A. Mihai ◽  
A. Blayney ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-428
Author(s):  
Mark G. Pfeiffer ◽  
Arthur I. Siegel

The paper describes the process of model development and applies multiattribute utility theory to the practical problem of optimizing the selection among competing models designed for the same purpose. As an example, two models (Human Interactive and Monte Carlo) are compared which differ on the basis of their existing levels of abstraction, or their degree of remoteness from the real world. The slight superiority of the Monte Carlo Model resulted largely because it had higher utilities for the more important attributes of models such as repeatability of output, degree of error/low variability, and feasibility of use and application.


2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 984-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyla Moghaddasi ◽  
Eva Bezak ◽  
Loredana G. Marcu

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenza Jaidi ◽  
Benoit Barbeau ◽  
Annie Carrière ◽  
Raymond Desjardins ◽  
Michèle Prévost

A Monte Carlo model, based on the Quantitative Microbial Risk Analysis approach (QMRA), has been developed to assess the relative risks of infection associated with the presence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in drinking water. The impact of various approaches for modelling the initial parameters of the model on the final risk assessments is evaluated. The Monte Carlo simulations that we performed showed that the occurrence of parasites in raw water was best described by a mixed distribution: log-Normal for concentrations > detection limit (DL), and a uniform distribution for concentrations < DL. The selection of process performance distributions for modelling the performance of treatment (filtration and ozonation) influences the estimated risks significantly. The mean annual risks for conventional treatment are: 1.97E−03 (removal credit adjusted by log parasite = log spores), 1.58E−05 (log parasite = 1.7 × log spores) or 9.33E−03 (regulatory credits based on the turbidity measurement in filtered water). Using full scale validated SCADA data, the simplified calculation of CT performed at the plant was shown to largely underestimate the risk relative to a more detailed CT calculation, which takes into consideration the downtime and system failure events identified at the plant (1.46E−03 vs. 3.93E−02 for the mean risk).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document