The effect of CO2laser irradiation plus fluoride dentifrice on the inhibition of secondary caries on root surfaces adjacent to glass ionomer cement or composite resin restorations

Laser Physics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 025602 ◽  
Author(s):  
S R Rodrigues ◽  
M Moraes ◽  
F S Hanashiro ◽  
M N Youssef ◽  
A Brugnera Junior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
Fluoride Dentifrice ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Root Surfaces ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Restorations

scholarly journals Gambaran Penggunaan Resin Komposit dan Semen Ionomer Kaca Sebagai Bahan Restorasi di Poli Gigi Rumah Sakit Gunung Maria Tomohon Tahun 2012

e-GIGI ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sumolang
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Dental Resin ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Restorations

Gigi yang terserang kariesdapatdirawatdenganmenggunakanbahanrestorasi. Resin komposit dan semen ionomer kacamerupakanbahanyangdigunakanuntukperawatanrestorasi di poli gigi RS Gunung Maria Tomohon.Tujuanpenelitianiniuntukmengetahuigambaranpenggunaanbahanrestorasi resin kompositdan semen ionomerkaca di poligigi RSGunung Maria Tomohontahun 2012. Penelitianinimerupakanpenelitiandeskrpitif, data diambildarirekammedispasienrestorasidenganmetodetotal sampling.Data yang didapatyaitujumlah rekammedis pasien restorasi pada tahun 2012 sebanyak 268 danjumlahgigi yang direstorasisebanyak 387.Gigi yang direstorasimenggunakanbahan resin kompositsebanyak 207 gigi, sedangkangigi yang direstorasimenggunakan semen ionomerkacasebanyak 180 gigi.Hasilpenelitianinidibagiberdasarkanusia, jeniskelamin, elemengigidandiagnosa. Hasilpenelitianmenunjukankategoriusiadewasalebihseringmelakukanperawatanretorasi resin komposit dengan 145 gigi (70%) dan semen ionomerkaca dengan 106 gigi (58,8%) yang direstorasi, pasienperempuanlebihseringmelakukanperawatanrestorasiresin komposit dengan 117 (59,4%) dan semen ionomerkaca dengan 101 (56%) gigi yang direstorasi. Gigi bagian anterior seringdirestorasidengan menggunakan resin komposit dan gigibagian posterior seringdirestorasimenggunakan semen ionomerkaca.Hiperemiapulpamerupakanpenyakit yang paling didiagnosadan paling seringmendapatkanperawatanrestorasi resin komposit dengan 179 kasus (86%)dan semen ionomerkaca 157 kasus (87,3%).Kata Kunci:bahan restorasi, resin komposit, semen ionomerkacaABSTRACT Dental caries infected can be treated with restorative materials. Resin composites and glass ionomer cement is a material used for dental restorative treatment on poly Hospital Gunung Maria Tomohon. The purpose of this study to describe the use of composite resin restorations and glass ionomer cement in the teeth poly Hospital Gunung Maria Tomohon in 2012. This research is deskrpitif , data extracted from medical records of patients with restoration of total sampling.Data method obtained the restoration of the patient's medical record number in 2012 as many as 268 and the number of restored teeth as much as 387. Restored teeth using composite resin materials as much as 207 teeth, whereas the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement as many as 180 teeth. The results are divided based on age, sex, dental and diagnostic elements. The results showed the adult age category more often retorasi care dental resin composite with 145 (70 %) and glass ionomer cement with 106 teeth (58,8 %) were restored, female patients were more frequent maintenance of composite resin restorations with 117 (59,4 %) and glass ionomer cement with 101(56 %) restored teeth. Anterior teeth are restored using gigibagian posterior composite resin and glass ionomer cement seringdirestorasimenggunakan. Pulp hyperemia is the most diagnosed diseases and most often get care composite resin restorations with 179 cases (86 %) and glass ionomer cement 157 cases (87,3%). Keywords : restorative materials, composite resin, glass ionomer cement

18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise H. van de Sande ◽  
Paulo A. Da Rosa Rodolpho ◽  
Gabriela R. Basso ◽  
Rômulo Patias ◽  
Quéren F. da Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Restorations

A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. E32-E42 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Balkaya ◽  
S Arslan
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Postoperative Sensitivity ◽  
Resin Restorations

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Class II restorations of a high-viscosity glass ionomer material, of a bulk-fill composite resin, and of a microhybrid composite resin. Methods and Materials: One hundred nine Class II restorations were performed in 54 patients using three different restorative materials: Charisma Smart Composite (CSC; a conventional composite resin), Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF; a high-viscosity bulk-fill composite), and Equia Forte Fil (EF; a high-viscosity glass ionomer). Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE, Neuss, Germany) was used for both conventional and bulk-fill composite resin restorations. The restorations were evaluated using modified US Public Health Service criteria in terms of retention, color match, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, contact point, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and surface texture. The data were analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher, and McNemar tests. Results: Eighty-four restorations were evaluated at two-year recalls. There were clinically acceptable changes in composite resin restorations (FBF and CSC). In addition, no statistically significant difference was observed between the clinical performances of these materials in terms of all criteria (p>0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the EF group and the FBF and CSC groups in all parameters except for marginal discoloration, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity (p<0.05). Conclusions: The tested bulk-fill and conventional composite resins showed acceptable clinical performance in Class II cavities. However, if EF is to be used for Class II restoration, its use should be carefully considered.

scholarly journals Cuspal Deflection in Premolar Teeth Restored Using Current Composite Resins With and Without Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Liner

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Karaman ◽  
G Ozgunaltay
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement

SUMMARY Aim: To evaluate the effects of four different types of composite resins and a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner on the cuspal deflection of large MOD cavities in vitro. Materials & Methods: One hundred twenty-eight extracted human upper premolar teeth were used. After the teeth were divided into eight groups (n=16), standardized large MOD cavities were prepared. The distance between cusp tips was measured before and after the cavity preparations with a digital micrometer. Then the teeth were restored with different resin composites (Filtek Supreme XT, Filtek P60, Filtek Z250, Filtek Silorane - 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) with and without a RMGIC liner (Vitrebond, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Cuspal deflection was measured 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h after the completion of restorations. The data were statistically analyzed with Friedman and Kruskal Wallis tests. Results: A significant reduction in cuspal deflection was observed in Filtek Silorane restorations with and without RMGIC liner (p<0.05). In all restored teeth, the distance between cusps was reduced but they did not return to their original positions during the 48 h period. All teeth showed cuspal deflection, but placement of RMGIC liner reduced it. Conclusion: The use of silorane-based composites and the placement of RMGIC liner under the composite resin restorations resulted in significantly reduced cuspal deflection.

scholarly journals Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Gama-Teixeira ◽  
Maria Regina Lorenzeti Simionato ◽  
Silvia Nagib Elian ◽  
Maria Angela Pita Sobral ◽  
Maria Aparecida Alves de Cerqueira Luz
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Cement Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Intact Surface ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The aim of this study was to define, in vitro, the potential to inhibit secondary caries of restorative materials currently used in dental practice. Standard cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of fifty extracted human third molars. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups, each one restored with one of the following materials: glass ionomer cement (GIC); amalgam; light-cured composite resin; ion-releasing composite; and light-cured, fluoride-containing composite resin. The teeth were thermocycled, sterilized with gamma irradiation, exposed to a cariogenic challenge using a bacterial system using Streptococcus mutans, and then prepared for microscopic observation. The following parameters were measured in each lesion formed: extension, depth, and caries inhibition area. The outer lesions developed showed an intact surface layer and had a rectangular shape. Wall lesions were not observed inside the cavities. After Analysis of Variance and Component of Variance Models Analysis, it was observed that the GIC group had the smallest lesions and the greatest number of caries inhibition areas. The lesions developed around Amalgam and Ariston pHc restorations had an intermediate size and the largest lesions were observed around Z-100 and Heliomolar restorations. It may be concluded that the restorative materials GIC, amalgam and ion-releasing composites may reduce secondary caries formation.

Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuray Attar ◽  
Alev Önen
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Polarized Light ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
Dental Restorations ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Acid Gel ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Dental restorations fail for a variety of reasons. Secondary caries is one of the primary causes of failure of dental restorations. One method for reducing frequency and severity of this problem is the use of fluoride containing restorative materials. The ability of a material to inhibit secondary caries formation is an important clinical therapeutic property. This investigation assessed the capacity of esthetic restorative materials to resist caries in vitro. Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual surfaces of 50 extracted sound third molars. The occlusal and gingival cavosurface margin of each preparation was on enamel surface. The five materials were used: Conventional glass ionomer cement Ceramfil ß (PSP), two polyacid modified resin composites Compoglass (Vivadent) and Dyract (Dentsply/DeTrey), non fluoride releasing composite resin Valux Plus (3M) and fluoride releasing composite resin Tetric (Vivadent). After 10 weeks in an acid gel for caries-like lesion formation, the teeth were sectioned occluso-gingivally through the middle of the restorations and examined by polarized light microscopy, while immersed in water. The statistical analysis of the results showed that secondary caries initiation and progression might be reduced significantly when fluoride-containing materials were placed. The conventional glass ionomer cement (Ceramfil ß) provided the highest protection against caries attack and the non-fluoride releasing composite resin (Valux Plus) restoration provided the least (p<0.05).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document