18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise H. van de Sande ◽  
Paulo A. Da Rosa Rodolpho ◽  
Gabriela R. Basso ◽  
Rômulo Patias ◽  
Quéren F. da Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Restorations

scholarly journals Gambaran Penggunaan Resin Komposit dan Semen Ionomer Kaca Sebagai Bahan Restorasi di Poli Gigi Rumah Sakit Gunung Maria Tomohon Tahun 2012

e-GIGI ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sumolang
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Dental Resin ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Restorations

Gigi yang terserang kariesdapatdirawatdenganmenggunakanbahanrestorasi. Resin komposit dan semen ionomer kacamerupakanbahanyangdigunakanuntukperawatanrestorasi di poli gigi RS Gunung Maria Tomohon.Tujuanpenelitianiniuntukmengetahuigambaranpenggunaanbahanrestorasi resin kompositdan semen ionomerkaca di poligigi RSGunung Maria Tomohontahun 2012. Penelitianinimerupakanpenelitiandeskrpitif, data diambildarirekammedispasienrestorasidenganmetodetotal sampling.Data yang didapatyaitujumlah rekammedis pasien restorasi pada tahun 2012 sebanyak 268 danjumlahgigi yang direstorasisebanyak 387.Gigi yang direstorasimenggunakanbahan resin kompositsebanyak 207 gigi, sedangkangigi yang direstorasimenggunakan semen ionomerkacasebanyak 180 gigi.Hasilpenelitianinidibagiberdasarkanusia, jeniskelamin, elemengigidandiagnosa. Hasilpenelitianmenunjukankategoriusiadewasalebihseringmelakukanperawatanretorasi resin komposit dengan 145 gigi (70%) dan semen ionomerkaca dengan 106 gigi (58,8%) yang direstorasi, pasienperempuanlebihseringmelakukanperawatanrestorasiresin komposit dengan 117 (59,4%) dan semen ionomerkaca dengan 101 (56%) gigi yang direstorasi. Gigi bagian anterior seringdirestorasidengan menggunakan resin komposit dan gigibagian posterior seringdirestorasimenggunakan semen ionomerkaca.Hiperemiapulpamerupakanpenyakit yang paling didiagnosadan paling seringmendapatkanperawatanrestorasi resin komposit dengan 179 kasus (86%)dan semen ionomerkaca 157 kasus (87,3%).Kata Kunci:bahan restorasi, resin komposit, semen ionomerkacaABSTRACT Dental caries infected can be treated with restorative materials. Resin composites and glass ionomer cement is a material used for dental restorative treatment on poly Hospital Gunung Maria Tomohon. The purpose of this study to describe the use of composite resin restorations and glass ionomer cement in the teeth poly Hospital Gunung Maria Tomohon in 2012. This research is deskrpitif , data extracted from medical records of patients with restoration of total sampling.Data method obtained the restoration of the patient's medical record number in 2012 as many as 268 and the number of restored teeth as much as 387. Restored teeth using composite resin materials as much as 207 teeth, whereas the teeth restored with glass ionomer cement as many as 180 teeth. The results are divided based on age, sex, dental and diagnostic elements. The results showed the adult age category more often retorasi care dental resin composite with 145 (70 %) and glass ionomer cement with 106 teeth (58,8 %) were restored, female patients were more frequent maintenance of composite resin restorations with 117 (59,4 %) and glass ionomer cement with 101(56 %) restored teeth. Anterior teeth are restored using gigibagian posterior composite resin and glass ionomer cement seringdirestorasimenggunakan. Pulp hyperemia is the most diagnosed diseases and most often get care composite resin restorations with 179 cases (86 %) and glass ionomer cement 157 cases (87,3%). Keywords : restorative materials, composite resin, glass ionomer cement

scholarly journals Cuspal Deflection in Premolar Teeth Restored Using Current Composite Resins With and Without Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Liner

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Karaman ◽  
G Ozgunaltay
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Ionomer Cement

SUMMARY Aim: To evaluate the effects of four different types of composite resins and a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner on the cuspal deflection of large MOD cavities in vitro. Materials & Methods: One hundred twenty-eight extracted human upper premolar teeth were used. After the teeth were divided into eight groups (n=16), standardized large MOD cavities were prepared. The distance between cusp tips was measured before and after the cavity preparations with a digital micrometer. Then the teeth were restored with different resin composites (Filtek Supreme XT, Filtek P60, Filtek Z250, Filtek Silorane - 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) with and without a RMGIC liner (Vitrebond, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Cuspal deflection was measured 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h after the completion of restorations. The data were statistically analyzed with Friedman and Kruskal Wallis tests. Results: A significant reduction in cuspal deflection was observed in Filtek Silorane restorations with and without RMGIC liner (p<0.05). In all restored teeth, the distance between cusps was reduced but they did not return to their original positions during the 48 h period. All teeth showed cuspal deflection, but placement of RMGIC liner reduced it. Conclusion: The use of silorane-based composites and the placement of RMGIC liner under the composite resin restorations resulted in significantly reduced cuspal deflection.

scholarly journals Modified Technique of Porcelain Laminate Veneer in Premolars with Abfraction Lesions: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126
Author(s):  
Larissa Marcia Martins Alves ◽  
Lisseth Patricia Claudio Contreras ◽  
João Paulo Mendes Tribst ◽  
Renata Marques de Melo ◽  
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Fea ◽  
Laminate Veneers ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The incidence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) has increased as populations are aging, and teeth are increasingly retained for life. Several materials are available to treat these lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution of maxillary premolars with NCCLs using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) according to different restorative techniques. A 3D FEA mathematical model simulating a sound premolar was initially modeled and replicated in 6 more models simulating a tooth with abfraction: G.1 tooth with abfraction; G.2 tooth with abfraction + composite resin restoration; G.3 tooth with abfraction + glass-ionomer cement restoration; G.4 tooth with abfraction + resin composite restoration + porcelain laminate veneers; G.5 tooth with abfraction + glass-ionomer cement + porcelain laminate veneers; and G.6 modified porcelain laminate veneers filling the lesion. All materials and structures were considered linear, elastic, homogeneous and isotropic and the results were expressed as maximum principal stress. Lower stress concentration in dentin was calculated when the tooth was restored with composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. Regarding the veneer techniques, no difference was found to dentin stress among the groups, but the modified veneer concentrated less stress in the restoration than other the techniques. The control group had the highest concentration of stress in the lesion. All techniques decreased the stress concentration inside the NCCLs and the indirect veneer filling the lesion presented better biomechanical behavior than the veneer cemented above direct restorations.  Keywords: Finite Element Analysis. Dental Veneers. Ceramics. Bicuspid. Resumo A incidência de lesões cervicais não-cariosas (LCNC) tem aumentado, uma vez que a população tem envelhecido com uma menor perda de elementos dentários. Diferentes materiais estão disponíveis para tratar dessas lesões. Este estudo objetivou avaliar a distribuição de tensão de pré-molares superiores com LCNC por meio da análise tridimensional (3D) de elementos finitos (FEA) de acordo com diferentes técnicas restauradoras. Um modelo matemático 3D FEA simulando um pré-molar íntegro foi modelado e replicado em mais 6 modelos simulando um dente com abfração: G.1 dente com abfração; G.2 dente com abfração + resina composta; G.3 dente com abfração + cimento de ionômero de vidro; G.4 dente com abfração + resina composta + faceta; G.5 dente com abfração + cimento de ionômero de vidro + faceta cerâmica e G.6 com faceta cerâmica modificada, preenchendo a lesão. Todos os materiais e estruturas foram considerados lineares, elásticos, homogêneos e isotrópicos e os resultados foram expressos como máxima tensão principal. Menor concentração de tensão na dentina foi calculada quando o dente foi restaurado com resina composta ou cimento de ionômero de vidro. Dentre os grupos com laminados, não houve diferença para a dentina, entretanto a faceta modificada apresentou menor concentração de tensão na restauração. O grupo controle apresentou a maior concentração de tensão na lesão. Todas as técnicas restauradoras diminuíram a concentração de tensão no interior das LCNCs e dentre as técnicas com laminados a faceta modificada apresentou o melhor comportamento biomecânico. Palavras-chave: Análise de Elementos Finitos. Facetas Dentárias. Cerâmica. Dente Pré-Molar.

scholarly journals Apexogenesis of traumatized maxillary right central incisor: Case report with 4years follow up

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hammo DDS ◽  
Mazen Doumani DDS. MSc. ◽  
Adnan Habib DDS. MSc. PhD
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Vital Pulp Therapy ◽  
Open Apices ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The main goal of vital pulp therapy is to preserve and maintain pulpal health in teeth that have been exposed to caries, trauma, and restorative procedures. This type of endodontic treatment is very important in young permanent teeth that have not reached their complete length and exhibit thin-walled roots and wide open apices. The developments in knowledge of pulpal physiology and immunology, beside to newly introduced dental materials, have changed the treatment approaches for teeth with involved pulps. This report describes a case of a young patient in whom maxillary right central incisor suffered crown fractures because of a traumatic accident. Pulpotomy with MTA were performed in order to achieve apexogenesis and the tooth was restored with a glass ionomer cement and composite resin. The patient was reviewed over 4years. 

A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. E32-E42 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Balkaya ◽  
S Arslan
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Secondary Caries ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Postoperative Sensitivity ◽  
Resin Restorations

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Class II restorations of a high-viscosity glass ionomer material, of a bulk-fill composite resin, and of a microhybrid composite resin. Methods and Materials: One hundred nine Class II restorations were performed in 54 patients using three different restorative materials: Charisma Smart Composite (CSC; a conventional composite resin), Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF; a high-viscosity bulk-fill composite), and Equia Forte Fil (EF; a high-viscosity glass ionomer). Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE, Neuss, Germany) was used for both conventional and bulk-fill composite resin restorations. The restorations were evaluated using modified US Public Health Service criteria in terms of retention, color match, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, contact point, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and surface texture. The data were analyzed using the chi-square, Fisher, and McNemar tests. Results: Eighty-four restorations were evaluated at two-year recalls. There were clinically acceptable changes in composite resin restorations (FBF and CSC). In addition, no statistically significant difference was observed between the clinical performances of these materials in terms of all criteria (p>0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the EF group and the FBF and CSC groups in all parameters except for marginal discoloration, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity (p<0.05). Conclusions: The tested bulk-fill and conventional composite resins showed acceptable clinical performance in Class II cavities. However, if EF is to be used for Class II restoration, its use should be carefully considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document