scholarly journals Wind Tunnel Tests of Wind Turbine Airfoils at High Reynolds Numbers

2014 ◽  
Vol 524 ◽  
pp. 012012 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Llorente ◽  
A Gorostidi ◽  
M Jacobs ◽  
W A Timmer ◽  
X Munduate ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Passaggia ◽  
Guillermo Lopez Quesada ◽  
Stéphane Loyer ◽  
Lucien Baldas ◽  
Jean-Christophe Robinet ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
J L Stollery ◽  
A V Murthy

SummaryThe paper suggests a simple method of generating intermittent reservoir conditions for an intermittent, cryogenic wind tunnel. Approximate performance estimates are given and it is recommended that further studies be made because this type of tunnel could be valuable in increasing the opportunities for research at high Reynolds numbers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Su Jung ◽  
Ganesh Vijayakumar ◽  
Shreyas Ananthan ◽  
James Baeder

Abstract. Modern wind-turbine airfoil design requires robust performance predictions for varying thicknesses, shapes, and appropriate Reynolds numbers. The airfoils of current large offshore wind turbines operate with chord-based Reynolds numbers in the range of 3–15 million. Turbulence transition in the airfoil boundary layer is known to play an important role in the aerodynamics of these airfoils near the design operating point. While the lack of prediction of lift stall through Reynold-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is well-known, airfoil design using CFD requires the accurate prediction of the glide ratio (L / D) in the linear portion of the lift polar. The prediction of the drag bucket and the glide ratio is greatly affected by the choice of the transition model in RANS-CFD of airfoils. We present the performance of two existing local correlation-based transition models – one-equation (γ) and two-equation model coupled with the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) RANS turbulence model – for offshore wind-turbine airfoils operating at a high Reynolds number. We compare the predictions of the two transition models with available experimental and CFD data in the literature in the Reynolds number range of 3–15 million including the AVATAR project measurements of the DU00-W-212 airfoil. Both transition models predict a larger L / D compared to fully turbulent results at all Reynolds numbers. The two models exhibit similar behavior at Reynolds numbers around 3 million. However, at higher Reynolds numbers, the one-equation model fails to predict the natural transition behavior due to early transition onset. The two-equation transition model predicts the aerodynamic coefficients for airfoils of various thickness at higher Reynolds numbers up to 15 million more accurately compared to the one-equation model. The two-equation model also predicts the correct trends with the variation of Reynolds number comparable to the eN transition model. However, a limitation of this model is observed at very high Reynolds numbers of around 12–15 million where the predictions are very sensitive to the inflow turbulent intensity. The combination of the transition model coupled with the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) RANS turbulence model is a robust method for performance prediction of modern wind-turbine airfoils using CFD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 02111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Václav Uruba ◽  
Zdeněk Pátek ◽  
Pavel Procházka ◽  
Vladislav Skála ◽  
David Zacho ◽  
...  

The stereo PIV measurement were performed behind a wing in the plane perpendicular to the flow to study the vortical structures oriented in the streamwise direction, which take place both in suction and pressure sides of the wing. The Reynolds numbers during the experiments in the 3 m wind tunnel range from 0.5 million up to 1.5 million.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document