scholarly journals Non-destructive leaf area estimation of Fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Iraqi grown in different root zone spatial limitation and controlled porosity level under greenhouse condition

2021 ◽  
Vol 765 (1) ◽  
pp. 012072
Author(s):  
M M Isa ◽  
K F Kasim ◽  
M F A Muttalib ◽  
M N Jaafar
1991 ◽  
Vol 45 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.V. Potdar ◽  
K.R. Pawar

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
MC. Souza ◽  
CL. Amaral

Leaf area estimation is an important biometrical trait for evaluating leaf development and plant growth in field and pot experiments. We developed a non-destructive model to estimate the leaf area (LA) of Vernonia ferruginea using the length (L) and width (W) leaf dimensions. Different combinations of linear equations were obtained from L, L2, W, W2, LW and L2W2. The linear regressions using the product of LW dimensions were more efficient to estimate the LA of V. ferruginea than models based on a single dimension (L, W, L2 or W2). Therefore, the linear regression “LA=0.463+0.676WL” provided the most accurate estimate of V. ferruginea leaf area. Validation of the selected model showed that the correlation between real measured leaf area and estimated leaf area was very high.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Pandey ◽  
Hema Singh

Easy, accurate, inexpensive, and nondestructive methods to determine individual leaf area of plants are a useful tool in physiological and agronomic studies. This paper introduces a cost-effective alternative (called here millimeter graph paper method) for standard electronic leaf area meter, using a millimeter graph paper. Investigations were carried out during August–October, 2009-2010, on 33 species, in the Botanical garden of the Banaras Hindu University at Varanasi, India. Estimates of leaf area were obtained by the equation, leaf area (cm2) = x/y, where x is the weight (g) of the area covered by the leaf outline on a millimeter graph paper, and y is the weight of one cm2 of the same graph paper. These estimates were then compared with destructive measurements obtained through a leaf area meter; the two sets of estimates were significantly and linearly related with each other, and hence the millimeter graph paper method can be used for estimating leaf area in lieu of leaf area meter. The important characteristics of this cost-efficient technique are its easiness and suitability for precise, non-destructive estimates. This model can estimate accurately the leaf area of plants in many experiments without the use of any expensive instruments.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
M. F. Pommpelli ◽  
J. M. Figueirôa ◽  
F. Lozano-Isla

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 295
Author(s):  
Adriano Bicioni Pacheco ◽  
Jéssica Garcia Nascimento ◽  
Larissa Brêtas Moura ◽  
Tárcio Rocha Lopes ◽  
Sergio Nascimento Duarte ◽  
...  

Leaf area estimation is a very important indicator in studies related to plant anatomy, morphology and physiology, and in many cases, it is a fundamental criterion to understand plant response to input conditions. Although there are leaf area prediction models have been produced for some plant species, a leaf area estimation model has not yet been developed for the zucchini. The objective of this paper was to determine the leaf area based on destructive and non-destructive methods for zucchini. The accuracy of measurement methods was evaluated and compared to determinations of the leaf area by the scanning integration method (LICOR equipment LI 3100C), considered as standard procedure. Non-destructive methods consisted of digital photography and measurement of leaf dimensions (width and length) based on ImageJ software. The destructive methods used were a) leaf area integrator LI-3100C, b) determination of leaf mass and c) weighing of leaf discs punched from the leaves. According to statistical parameters that evaluate the performance of the analyzed methods: determination coefficient (R2), Pearson (r) correlation coefficient, Willmott agreement index (d) and Camargo and Sentelhas performance index (c) the parameters presented values higher than 0.8820, classifying the methods as very good, whereas the modeling efficiency index (NSE) and the percentage of bias (PBIAS) also classified the methods as very good (0.87≤NSE≤0.99; -4.80≤PBIAS≤1.40), except the ImageJ method without correction (NSE=0.77; PBIAS = -22.70).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document