Effect of point spread function position bias in wavefront coding infrared imaging system

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 025703
Author(s):  
Bin Feng ◽  
Zelin Shi ◽  
Haizheng Liu ◽  
Yaohong Zhao ◽  
Jianlei Zhang
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 0411002
Author(s):  
周红仙 Zhou Hongxian ◽  
周有平 Zhou Youping ◽  
王毅 Wang Yi

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (14) ◽  
pp. 1405003
Author(s):  
卢泉 Lu Quan ◽  
张泽昊 Zhang Zehao ◽  
张卫平 Zhang Weiping ◽  
刘诣荣 Liu Yirong

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 311004
Author(s):  
马庆力 MA Qing-li ◽  
唐世彪 TANG Shi-biao ◽  
吴彦华 WU Yan-hua

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingyu Zhao ◽  
Zi Ye ◽  
Wenzi Zhang ◽  
Yanping Chen ◽  
Feihong Yu

2019 ◽  
Vol 632 ◽  
pp. A85
Author(s):  
M. Zhang ◽  
J. Kainulainen

Context. The Vista Variables in the Vía Láctea (VVV) survey has performed a multi-epoch near-infrared imaging of the inner Galactic plane. High-fidelity photometric catalogs are needed to utilize the data. Aims. We aim at producing a deep, point spread function (PSF) photometric catalog for the VVV survey J-,H-, and Ks-band data. Specifically, we aim to take advantage of multiple epochs of the survey to reach high limiting magnitudes. Methods. We developed an automatic PSF-fitting pipeline based on the DaoPHOT algorithm and performed photometry on the stacked VVV images in J,  H, and Ks bands. Results. We present a PSF photometric catalog in the Vega system that contains about 926 million sources in the J,  H, and Ks filters. About 10% of the sources are flagged as possible spurious detections. The 5σ limiting magnitudes of the sources with high reliability are about 20.8, 19.5, and 18.7 mag in the J,  H, and Ks bands, respectively, depending on the local crowding condition. Our photometric catalog reaches on average about one magnitude deeper than the previously released PSF DoPHOT photometric catalog and includes less spurious detections. There are significant differences in the brightnesses of faint sources between our catalog and the previously released one. The likely origin of these differences is in the different photometric algorithms that are used; it is not straightforward to assess which catalog is more accurate in different situations. Our new catalog is beneficial especially for science goals that require high limiting magnitudes; our catalog reaches such high magnitudes in fields that have a relatively uniform source number density. Overall, the limiting magnitudes and completeness are different in fields with different crowding conditions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kotyński

AbstractMetal-dielectric layered stacks for imaging with sub-wavelength resolution are regarded as linear isoplanatic systems — a concept popular in Fourier optics and in scalar diffraction theory. In this context, a layered flat lens is a one-dimensional spatial filter characterised by the point spread function. However, depending on the model of the source, the definition of the point spread function for multilayers with sub-wavelength resolution may be formulated in several ways. Here, a distinction is made between a soft source and hard electric or magnetic sources. Each of these definitions leads to a different meaning of perfect imaging. It is shown that some simple interpretations of the PSF, such as the relation of its width to the resolution of the imaging system are ambiguous for the multilayers with sub-wavelenth resolution. These differences must be observed in point spread function engineering of layered systems with sub-wavelength sized PSF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document