Evidence-Based Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Koo ◽  
Jared S. Winoker ◽  
Hiten Patel ◽  
Farzana Faisal ◽  
Natasha Gupta ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 203 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Koo ◽  
Farzana Faisal ◽  
Natasha Gupta ◽  
Alexa R. Meyer ◽  
Hiten D. Patel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Koo* ◽  
Farzana Faisal ◽  
Natasha Gupta ◽  
Alexa Meyer ◽  
Hiten Patel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 2030-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle T. Friedman ◽  
Saber Ghiassi ◽  
Matthew O. Hubbard ◽  
Andrew J. Duffy

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Micali ◽  
Giovannalberto Pini ◽  
Dogu Teber ◽  
Maria Chiara Sighinolfi ◽  
Stefano De Stefani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Carpinito ◽  
Shanta Shepherd ◽  
David S. Wang ◽  
Mark H. Katz ◽  
Shaun E. L. Wason

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S105-S106
Author(s):  
P. Doran ◽  
G. Sheppard ◽  
B. Metcalfe

Introduction: Canadians are the second largest consumers of prescription opioids per capita in the world. Emergency physicians tend to prescribe stronger and larger quantities of opioids, while family physicians write the most opioid prescriptions overall. These practices have been shown to precipitate future dependence, toxicity and the need for hospitalization. Despite this emerging evidence, there is a paucity of research on emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices in Canada. The objectives of this study were to describe our local emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing patterns both in the emergency department and upon discharge, and to explore factors that impact their prescribing decisions. Methods: Emergency physicians from two urban, adult emergency departments in St. John's, Newfoundland were anonymously surveyed using a web-based survey tool. All 42 physicians were invited to participate via email during the six-week study period and reminders were sent at weeks two and four. Results: A total of 21 participants responded to the survey. Over half of respondents (57.14%) reported that they “often” prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department, and an equal number of respondents reported doing so “sometimes” at discharge. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported most commonly prescribing intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department, and over thirty-five percent reported most commonly prescribing oral morphine upon discharge. Patient age and risk of misuse were the most frequently cited factors that influenced respondents’ prescribing decisions. Only 4 of the 22 respondents reported using evidence-based guidelines to tailor their opioid prescribing practices, while an overwhelming majority (80.95%) believe there is a need for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for the treatment of acute pain. Sixty percent of respondents completed additional training in safe opioid prescribing, yet less than half of respondents (42.86%) felt they could help to mitigate the opioid crisis by prescribing fewer opioids in the emergency department. Conclusion: Emergency physicians frequently prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain and new evidence suggests that this practice can lead to significant morbidity. While further research is needed to better understand emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices, our findings support the need for evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute pain to ensure patient safety.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 1602-1606
Author(s):  
Diana E. Peterman ◽  
Bryan P. Knoedler ◽  
Joseph A. Ewing ◽  
Alfredo M. Carbonell ◽  
William S. Cobb ◽  
...  

Background Increased recognition of the dangers of opioid analgesia has led to significant focus on strategies for reducing use through multimodal analgesia, enhanced recovery protocols, and standardized guidelines for prescribing. Our institution implemented a standard protocol for prescribing analgesics at discharge after ventral hernia repair (VHR). We hypothesize that this strategy significantly reduces opioid use. Methods A standardized protocol for discharge prescribing was implemented in March 2018. Patients were prescribed ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and opioids based on milligram morphine equivalent (MME) use the 24 hours prior to discharge. We retrospectively reviewed prescriptions of opioids for two 6-month periods—July-December 2017 (PRE) and July-December 2018 (POST)—for comparison using EPIC report and the South Carolina Prescription Monitoring Program. Analysis performed included Mann-Kendall linear trend test and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. Results VHR was performed in 105 patients in the PRE and 75 patients in the POST group. Total MME prescribed decreased significantly from mean 322.7 + 261.3/median 225 (IQR 150-400) MME to 141.6 + 150.4/median 100 (50-184) MME ( P < .001). This represents a 57% reduction in mean opioid MME prescriptions. Acetaminophen prescribing increased from 10% to 65%, and ibuprofen from 7.6% to 61.3%. Refills were prescribed in 21 patients (20%) during the PRE period, which decreased to 10.7% during the POST group ( P = .141). Implementation of an evidence-based protocol significantly reduces opioid prescribing after VHR. Discussion A multimodal approach to postoperative pain management decreases the need for opioids. The additional implementation of an evidence-based prescribing protocol results in significant reduction of opioid use following VHR.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 840-847
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Pickens ◽  
Jesse K. Sulzer ◽  
Allyson Cochran ◽  
Dionisios Vrochides ◽  
John B. Martinie ◽  
...  

The role of surgical intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis has evolved; however, no widely accepted algorithm has been established to guide timing and optimal modality in the minimally invasive era. This study aimed to retrospectively validate an established institutional timing- and physiologic-based algorithm constructed from evidence-based guidelines in a high-volume hepatopancreatobiliary center. Patients with necrotizing pancreatitis requiring early (≤six weeks from symptom onset) or delayed (>six weeks) surgical intervention were reviewed over a four-year period (n = 100). Early intervention was provided through laparoscopic drain-guided retroperitoneal debridement (n = 15) after failed percutaneous drainage unless they required an emergent laparotomy (due to abdominal compartment syndrome, bowel necrosis/perforation, or hemorrhage) after which conservative, sequential open necrosectomy was performed (n = 47). Robot-assisted (n = 16) versus laparoscopic (n = 22) transgastric cystgastrostomy for the delayed management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis was compared, including patient factors, operative characteristics, and 90-day clinical outcomes. Major complications after early debridement were similarly high (open 25% and drain-guided 27%), yet 90-day mortality was low (open 8.5% and drain-guided 7.1%). Patient and operative characteristics and 90-day outcomes were statistically similar for robotic versus laparoscopic transgastric cystogastrostomy. Our evidence-based algorithm provides a stepwise approach for the management of necrotizing pancreatitis, emphasizing minimally invasive early and late interventions when feasible with low morbidity and mortality. Robot-assisted transgastric cystogastrostomy is an acceptable alternative to a laparoscopic approach for the delayed treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Bissolati ◽  
Elena Orsenigo ◽  
Carlo Staudacher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document