Validation of an Unlabeled Probe Melting Analysis Assay Combined with High-Throughput Extractions for Genotyping of the Most Common Variants inHFE-Associated Hereditary Hemochromatosis, C282Y, H63D, and S65C

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 656-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelli Sumner ◽  
Lindsey Hubley ◽  
Genevieve Pont-Kingdon ◽  
Sheri Mitchell ◽  
Tyler Wayman ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 1191-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua G Vandersteen ◽  
Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir ◽  
Robert A Palais ◽  
Carl T Wittwer

Abstract Background: Heteroduplex scanning techniques usually detect all heterozygotes, including common variants not of clinical interest. Methods: We conducted high-resolution melting analysis on the 24 exons of the ACVRL1 and ENG genes implicated in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). DNA in samples from 13 controls and 19 patients was PCR amplified in the presence of LCGreen® I, and all 768 exons melted in an HR-1® instrument. We used 10 wild-type controls to identify common variants, and the remaining samples were blinded, amplified, and analyzed by melting curve normalization and overlay. Unlabeled probes characterized the sequence of common variants. Results: Eleven common variants were associated with 8 of the 24 HHT exons, and 96% of normal samples contained at least 1 variant. As a result, the positive predictive value (PPV) of a heterozygous exon was low (31%), even in a population of predominantly HHT patients. However, all common variants produced unique amplicon melting curves that, when considered and eliminated, resulted in a PPV of 100%. In our blinded study, 3 of 19 heterozygous disease-causing variants were missed; however, 2 were clerical errors, and the remaining false negative would have been identified by difference analysis. Conclusions: High-resolution melting analysis is a highly accurate heteroduplex scanning technique. With many exons, however, use of single-sample instruments may lead to clerical errors, and routine use of difference analysis is recommended. Common variants can be identified by their melting curve profiles and genotyped with unlabeled probes, greatly reducing the false-positive results common with scanning techniques.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. E1286-E1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf H.A.M. Vossen ◽  
Martine van Duijn ◽  
Mohamed R. Daha ◽  
Johan T. den Dunnen ◽  
Anja Roos

Author(s):  
Roberta V. Marotta ◽  
Olivia Turri ◽  
Antonella Morandi ◽  
Manuela Murano ◽  
Gianlodovico Melzi d'Eril ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1328-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luming Zhou ◽  
Alexander N Myers ◽  
Joshua G Vandersteen ◽  
Lesi Wang ◽  
Carl T Wittwer

Abstract Background: Homogeneous PCR methods for genotyping usually require fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. Amplicon melting with the DNA dye LCGreen™ I was recently introduced as a closed-tube method of genotyping that does not require probes or real-time PCR. However, some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could not be completely genotyped without addition of a known genotype, and high-resolution melting techniques were necessary. Methods: A 3′-blocked, unlabeled oligonucleotide probe and the saturating dye, LCGreen I, were added to standard PCR reagents before amplification. After PCR, the samples were melted at 0.1–0.3 °C/s in high-resolution (HR-1™), high-throughput (LightTyper™), and rapid-cycle, real-time (LightCycler®) instruments, and fluorescence melting curves were recorded. Results: Derivative melting curves of the probe–target duplexes were characteristic of the genotype under the probe. With synthetic plasmid templates, all SNP base combinations could be genotyped. For human genomic DNA, the technique was demonstrated with mutations associated with cystic fibrosis, including SNPs (G542X, I506V, and F508C) and 3-bp deletions (F508del and I507del). Conclusions: Genotyping of SNPs and small deletions by melting analysis of an unlabeled probe in the presence of LCGreen I is simple and rapid. Only three unlabeled oligonucleotides (two primers and one probe), a saturating DNA dye, PCR, and a melting instrument are required. The method is closed-tube, does not require fluorescently labeled probes or real-time PCR, and can be completed in <10 min on any instrument capable of monitoring melting curves by fluorescence.


2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 1847-1854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shale Dames ◽  
David C Pattison ◽  
L Kathryn Bromley ◽  
Carl T Wittwer ◽  
Karl V Voelkerding

Abstract Background: Unlabeled probe detection with a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) binding dye is one method to detect and confirm target amplification after PCR. Unlabeled probes and amplicon melting have been used to detect small deletions and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in assays where template is in abundance. Unlabeled probes have not been applied to low-level target detection, however. Methods: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) was chosen as a model to compare the unlabeled probe method to an in-house reference assay using dual-labeled, minor groove binding probes. A saturating dsDNA dye (LCGreen® Plus) was used for real-time PCR. HSV-1, HSV-2, and an internal control were differentiated by PCR amplicon and unlabeled probe melting analysis after PCR. Results: The unlabeled probe technique displayed 98% concordance with the reference assay for the detection of HSV from a variety of archived clinical samples (n = 182). HSV typing using unlabeled probes was 99% concordant (n = 104) to sequenced clinical samples and allowed for the detection of sequence polymorphisms in the amplicon and under the probe. Conclusions: Unlabeled probes and amplicon melting can be used to detect and genotype as few as 10 copies of target per reaction, restricted only by stochastic limitations. The use of unlabeled probes provides an attractive alternative to conventional fluorescence-labeled, probe-based assays for genotyping and detection of HSV and might be useful for other low-copy targets where typing is informative.


Author(s):  
Xiaofei Liu ◽  
Songyin Qiu ◽  
Lin Mei ◽  
Hongli Jing ◽  
Xiangmei Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The zinc finger BED-type containing 6 knockout (ZBED6-KO) pigs were created to improve economic traits by increasing the expression of insulin-like growth factor 2. They were generated by CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology and a single-base deletion of ZBED6 was found. An efficient and rapid method was needed to detect this type of pig. Objective This study aimed to develop a high-resolution melting (HRM) method to detect ZBED6-KO pigs. Methods An unlabeled probe and two primers were designed to develop HRM method. The limit of detection, specificity and accuracy of established method were tested by the constructed plasmid and DNA extracts of tissue specimens. Results The limit of detection by established method was 102 copies/µL. The HRM method with an unlabeled probe showed good specificity and high accuracy. Conclusions The established HRM analysis with an unlabeled probe showed it to be a highly effective, rapid and reliable to distinguish ZBED6-KO pigs with wild-type pigs. Highlights It is the first time that HRM analysis with an unlabeled probe has been used in the detection of genome editing pigs by the CRISPR/Cas9 technology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document