Quality of End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer in an Academic Medical Center

78 Background: Advanced cancers remain a major cause of mortality in Nigeria. Participation in clinical trials (PCTs) and palliative end-of-life care (PEOLC) are two approaches to incurable cancer management in the developed nations but these have been less adopted in Nigeria. This study set out to determine patients’ preferred approach between PCTs and PEOLC for management of advanced cancers in Nigeria. Methods: A survey of 120 advanced cancer patients was conducted using a questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale, variables of interest included demographic information, knowledge and perception about PCTs and PEOLC. Results: Majority of the patients (84%) agree PCTs is an option in management of incurable cancer but just about half accept it is beneficial and will improve their QOL, as against PEOLC, where all the patients considered it an option and deem it beneficial; with 99% and 98% respectively agreeing it will enhance their QOL and that of family members. About 56% believe PCTs carries a risk of burdensome interventions and 52% increased hospital stay at EOL while 47% are of the opinion it will increase cost of care with 45% stating it will lead to increased ICU death. Sixty-nine percent (69%) and 63% respectively agree PCTs increases the suffering of patients and family members while 43% believe it carries a net negative risk-benefit profile, nevertheless, 83% are ready to overlook the risk of PCTs for possible therapeutic benefit while for 87%, the primary motivation for PCTs is personal cure. Majority (58%) believe PCTs does not improve quality of dying/death contrary to PEOLC where 88% believe it would improve the quality of dying/death. Overall, by direct comparison 78%:13% prefer PEOL to PCTs; {X2(p-value), 40.26(0.001)}. Conclusions: Both modalities are acceptable to advanced cancer patients but the study reveals several ethical issues with PCTs including risk of burdensome interventions, suffering of patients, therapeutic misconception and misperception of curability. A major determinant to accepting PEOL is its positive impact on patients’ QOL. Concerted efforts are needed to significantly enhance access of PEOLC to cancer patients.

Download Full-text

ICU utilization among oncology patients at the end of life.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.27_suppl.118 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽

pp. 118-118

Author(s):

Jennifer Hong ◽

Christine Kurian ◽

Jared Minetola ◽

Valerie Pracilio Csik ◽

Adam Binder

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

End Of Life ◽

End Of Life Care ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Life Care ◽

Oncology Patients ◽

Code Status ◽

Care Plans

118 Background: Patients with advanced cancer have high rates of hospitalizations as a result of their oncologic care. Furthermore, these patients receive aggressive end of life care despite evidence that aggressive end of life care does not improves quality of life or outcomes for patients and is associated with worse bereavement adjustment for caregivers. The American Society of Clinical Oncology has endorsed several indicators of aggressive end of life care, but most striking is intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 30 days before death. Methods: Adult oncology patients who died within 30 days of hospitalization and/or admitted to the ICU from 10/2018-3/2019 at an academic medical center were evaluated. The cohort was identified using ICD-10 codes, EMR systems support, and manual chart review. Patient demographic data, cancer type, stage, line of therapy, code status, advanced care plan, prior admissions as well as other clinical characteristics were collected. Results: In total, 180 patients were included for analysis; 106 of which were admitted to the ICU. Of patients admitted to the ICU, 58 patients died (54.7%). Mean ECOG performance status was 1.24. Average number of admissions 3 and 6 months prior to death was 0.71 and 1.26. Thirty six percent of patients were on first or second-line chemotherapy. 41.37% of patients who died in the ICU had prolonged length of stay (>1 week). Only 34.48% were known to palliative care prior to admission and 12.06% of patients had advanced care plans in place at time of hospitalization. Palliative care was consulted on 32.75% of patients who died in the ICU. Ninety Three percent had their code status changed prior to death. Conclusions: Despite established recommendations to support otherwise, at our institution there continues to be high utilization of ICU care near the end of life. Previous admissions and ECOG status are poor predictors of death in this cohort. The majority of patients had relapsed and refractory disease. There was a low rate of advanced care planning or palliative care involvement prior to the patient’s hospitalization. Further interventions are underway to improve end of life planning in order to improve our quality of care.

Download Full-text

In-advance end-of-life discussions and the quality of inpatient end-of-life care: a pilot study in bereaved primary caregivers of advanced cancer patients

Supportive Care in Cancer ◽

10.1007/s00520-012-1581-x ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 21 (2) ◽

pp. 629-636 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Masanori Mori ◽

Donna Ellison ◽

Takamaru Ashikaga ◽

Ursula McVeigh ◽

Allan Ramsay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pilot Study ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

End Of Life Care ◽

Primary Caregivers ◽

Life Care ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients

Download Full-text

Quality of Death of Patients With Advanced Cancers in India

Journal of Global Oncology ◽

10.1200/jgo.18.44200 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽

pp. 98s-98s

Author(s):

S. Revathy ◽

V. Surendran ◽

G. Prasanth ◽

B. Kalpana

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Physical Health ◽

End Of Life ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Thematic Analysis ◽

End Of Life Care ◽

Descriptive Statistics ◽

Life Care ◽

Quality Of Death

Background: Death with dignity is a basic right of all patients with advanced cancer, whereas in India, the healthcare providers have not closely examined whether the end-of-life care promotes the quality of death. The quality of death analysis can give us an insight on the impact of the disease and palliative treatment on end-of-life care. Aim: This study aims to explore the quality of death of patients with advanced cancers. Methods: A mixed method study where the caregivers (n=108) of advanced cancer patients, who expired either during hospitalization or at home, were chosen through purposive sampling and interviewed to assess the quality of death, using validated caregiver ratings of patients' physical and mental distress on a scale of 0-10, along with an open ended question. The data thus obtained was analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test and χ2 test. The transcripts and scores were analyzed through thematic analysis and descriptive statistics respectively. Results: The mean quality of life during the final week of the patients who had expired is 4.17 (SD=2.44), while the psychological and physical health are 5.27 (SD= 2.49) and 3.75 (SD= 2.30), respectively. Almost 60% of the patients were reported to have average to good quality of life during their final week, whereas 73.1% and 52.7% of the patients had average to good psychological and physical health respectively. The physical health was found to be significantly higher among men ( P = 0.000) and among those who were aware of their prognosis ( P = 0.000). Also, patients who had expired at the hospital were found to have significantly better physical health during their end-of-life, than those who had expired at home ( P = 0.006 ), whereas, the psychological health and overall quality of life of the patients did not differ significantly between the place of death. The most commonly reported reason by the caregivers for the patients' distress was physical suffering. Pain, lack of appetite, difficulty in breathing and compromised mobility, irrespective of the site, was reported by 41.6%, 38.8%, 25.9% and 27.7% respectively. Majority of the patients (65.7%) were not aware of their prognosis, thus leading to psychological distress pertaining to anticipation about survival and worsening of physical symptoms. Despite the high distress, 60% reportedly had moderate to high quality of life in their last week of life. The thematic analysis of the transcripts resulted in seven subthemes, which were categorized under four major themes namely 'bodily discomfort', 'psychological experiences' with the subthemes moral emotions and emotional disturbances, 'awareness of prognosis' with the subthemes aware, unaware and conjecture and 'carers coping' with the subthemes perceived strain and contentment. Conclusion: Although the quality of life of patients under end of life care was perceived to be good, they suffered physically and psychologically, as reported by the caregivers.

Download Full-text

Race/Ethnicity as a Predictor for Location of Death in Patients With Acute Neurovascular Events

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® ◽

10.1177/1049909116687258 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (1) ◽

pp. 100-103 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Say Salomon ◽

Elizabeth Chuang ◽

Deepa Bhupali ◽

Daniel Labovitz

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

End Of Life ◽

Low Income ◽

End Of Life Care ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Ethnic Disparities ◽

Life Care ◽

Location Of Death ◽

Important Quality

Background: Site of death is an important quality indicator for patients with terminal illness. Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the quality of end-of-life care. This study explores the site of death of patients admitted for and dying of complications of acute neurovascular events in a hospital network in an urban, low-income, predominantly minority community. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to 1 of 3 general hospitals that are part of an academic medical center in Bronx, New York, with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage who died during the index admission or were discharged with hospice services. The main outcome was location of death (palliative care inpatient unit [IPU] at the medical center or hospice services at discharge vs death on any other IPU). Results: A total of 655 patients admitted with acute neurovascular events from January 1, 2009, to March 1, 2015, died or were discharged with hospice services and were included in the analysis. Of those patients, 238 (36.3%) were black, 233 (35.5%) were Hispanic, and 184 (28.1%) were white. A total of 178 (24.4%) died on the palliative care unit or were discharged with hospice services, including 55 black patients (23.1%), 52 (28.3%) white patients, and 53 (22.7%) Hispanic patients. These differences were not statistically significant, even when controlling for confounders. Conclusion: This study did not show a difference in site of death in our institution by race or ethnicity, which is considered an important quality end-of-life care metric.

Download Full-text