scholarly journals Predictors of Intensive End-of-Life and Hospice Care in Latino and White Advanced Cancer Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1249-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth T. Loggers ◽  
Paul K. Maciejewski ◽  
Rachel Jimenez ◽  
Matthew Nilsson ◽  
Elizabeth Paulk ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8572-8572
Author(s):  
L. Dias ◽  
E. Lamont

8572 Background: Despite the fact that cancer is the second leading cause of death in the US and represents the most frequent diagnosis among hospice patients, little is known about the factors that influence oncologists in their decision making around end of life care. Methods: We surveyed all clinically active medical oncology attending and fellow physicians at two affiliated academic medical centers eliciting oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding care of cancer patients at the end of life. Included in the survey were a series of randomized vignettes describing patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncologists were asked to describe their next treatment recommendations. Results: Of the 181 oncologists contacted for survey participation, 116 (64%) returned completed questionnaires. Sixty six percent (77/116) of respondents were attending physicians and 34% (39/116) were fellows. Sixty-five percent favored concurrent treatment with third-line chemotherapy and hospice if insurance would allow. Eighty percent (93/116) agreed that patients with advanced cancer should be able to receive hospice care even if they are receiving anti-tumor therapies. Results of randomized scenarios suggest that advanced patient age was positively associated with earlier referral to hospice care and that prior treatment on a clinical trial, although not statistically significant, was modestly associated with delayed referral to hospice (1.49, 95% CI 0.71–3.11). Conclusions: Among oncologists at two academic centers, chemotherapy is an important modality for management of advanced cancer patients at the end of life. Therefore, insurance policies that prohibit chemotherapy for hospice patients may constrain oncologists in their management of such patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Johannes Schilderman ◽  
Constans A. H. H. V. M. Verhagen ◽  
Judith B. Prins

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sommer ◽  
Christopher Chung ◽  
Dagmar M. Haller ◽  
Sophie Pautex

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Fliedner ◽  
Sofia Zambrano ◽  
Jos MGA Schols ◽  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Christa Lohrmann ◽  
...  

Background: Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients’ perspectives. However, little is known about how patients’ experience such interventions. Aim: To explore advanced cancer patients’ experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients’ life including influencing factors. Design: Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support,” a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. Results: Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel “confronting” but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients’ personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. Conclusion: Early palliative care interventions like “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support” may provoke emotions and feel “confrontational” often because this is the first time when issues about one’s end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.


Author(s):  
William Breitbart ◽  
Wendy G. Lichtenthal ◽  
Allison J. Applebaum ◽  
Melissa Masterson

Among the advanced cancer population, existential concerns are major issues that promote significant distress. For patients who are facing death, meaning and the preservation of meaning are not only clinically and existentially important but also central concepts to a therapeutic intervention. Based on Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy and the principles of existential psychology and philosophy, “meaning-centered psychotherapy” was developed to help patients with advanced cancer sustain or enhance a sense of meaning, peace, and purpose in their lives. This chapter provides an overview of work developing and testing individual meaning-centered psychotherapy (IMCP). It provides an overview of the session content in the IMCP intervention. It also presents findings from clinical trials, which support the efficacy of IMCP as an intervention to increase a sense of meaning, spiritual well-being, and hope while decreasing end-of-life despair. Furthermore, it presents difficult scenarios that may arise when delivering IMCP for clinicians interested in this work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document