Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block Versus Diclofenac Suppository and Local Anesthetic Infiltration Following Pediatric Laparoscopy

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoti Borkar ◽  
Nandini Dave
1981 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 779???782 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Gehrig ◽  
Yoko H. Colpitts ◽  
C. Richard Chapman

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 148 (8) ◽  
pp. 707 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Scott Dingeman ◽  
Lindsay M. Barus ◽  
Hyun Kee Chung ◽  
David J. Clendenin ◽  
Christopher S. Lee ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Yoshida ◽  
Eri Tanaka ◽  
Hiroyoshi Kawaai ◽  
Shinya Yamazaki

To obtain effective infiltration anesthesia in the jawbone, high concentrations of local anesthetic are needed. However, to reduce pain experienced by patients during local anesthetic administration, low-pressure injection is recommended for subperiosteal infiltration anesthesia. Currently, there are no studies regarding the effect of injection pressure on infiltration anesthesia, and a standard injection pressure has not been clearly determined. Hence, the effect of injection pressure of subperiosteal infiltration anesthesia on local anesthetic infiltration to the jawbone was considered by directly measuring lidocaine concentration in the jawbone. Japanese white male rabbits were used as test animals. After inducing general anesthesia with oxygen and sevoflurane, cannulation to the femoral artery was performed and arterial pressure was continuously recorded. Subperiosteal infiltration anesthesia was performed by injecting 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine containing 1/80,000 adrenaline, and injection pressure was monitored by a pressure transducer for 40 seconds. After specified time intervals (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes), jawbone and blood samples were collected, and the concentration of lidocaine at each time interval was measured. The mean injection pressure was divided into 4 groups (100 ± 50 mm Hg, 200 ± 50 mm Hg, 300 ± 50 mm Hg, and 400 ± 50 mm Hg), and comparison statistical analysis between these 4 groups was performed. No significant change in blood pressure during infiltration anesthesia was observed in any of the 4 groups. Lidocaine concentration in the blood and jawbone were highest 10 minutes after the infiltration anesthesia in all 4 groups and decreased thereafter. Lidocaine concentration in the jawbone increased as injection pressure increased, while serum lidocaine concentration was significantly lower. This suggests that when injection pressure of subperiosteal infiltration anesthesia is low, infiltration of local anesthetic to the jawbone may be reduced, while transfer to oral mucosa and blood may be increased.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shangyingying Li ◽  
Yanzhe Tan ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Lifei Liu ◽  
Shengfen Tu

Abstract Background Caudal block is widely used in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Many angles for needle insertion were compared to find a optimal angle during caudal block with high successful caudal injection and minimal risk of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectivity of a new method of needle insertion at an angel of 90°to the apex of the sacral hiatus for caudal block in newborns. Methods Sixty patients were included in our study, aged 0 to 28 days, posted for inguinal hernia surgery, randomly divided into two groups: a conventional method (CM) group and a new method (NM) group. In both groups, 1 ml∙kg-1 0.5% lignocaine at a rate of approximately 0.5 ml∙s-1 was given for caudal blocks after anaesthesia, and ultrasonographic observation of local anesthetic in the epidural space. Failure rate at the first attempt, puncture frequency, complications, and durations of block were recorded. Results The failure rate at the first attempt of caudal block were 16.7% in the conventional method group and 3.3% in the new method group (p<0.05). The mean time required (standard deviation) to perform needle insertion in the conventional method group was 2.6±0.5 minutes and in new method group 1.6±0.5 minutes (p<0.05). There were three cases aspirating the needle to find blood and one case to find cerebrospinal fluid in the conventional method group. The majority level which the local anesthetic reached are L1 by ultrasound imaging, 86.7% in the conventional method group and 83.3% in the new method group. Conclusion The study found that using the new method, the chance of performing a successful caudal injection can be increased, the time and the risk can be minimized compared to conventional technique. It is a safe and effective method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document