Suppression of Serum Prolactin Levels after Sports Concussion with Prompt Resolution Upon Independent Clinical Assessment To Permit Return-to-Play

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 904-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. La Fountaine ◽  
Michita Toda ◽  
Anthony Testa ◽  
William A. Bauman
Author(s):  
Steven R. Dayton ◽  
Hayden P. Baker ◽  
Ujash Sheth ◽  
Michael A. Terry ◽  
Vehniah K. Tjong

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i28-i31 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Putukian ◽  
M Aubry ◽  
P McCrory

2021 ◽  
pp. 105984052110322
Author(s):  
Jonathan Howland ◽  
Julia Campbell ◽  
Rebekah Thomas ◽  
Steven Smyth ◽  
Aynsley Chaneco ◽  
...  

Although all states have legislation pertaining to youth sports concussion, most of these laws focus on return-to-play procedures; only a few address return-to-learn (RTL) accommodations for students who have experienced a concussion. To address this gap in the legislation, some states and nongovernmental organizations have developed RTL guidelines to advise school personnel, parents, and health care providers on best practices for accommodating students' postconcussion reintegration into academic activity. In 2018, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) developed RTL guidelines which were disseminated to school nurses (SNs) at all public and nonpublic middle and high schools in the state. In 2020, the MDPH engaged the Injury Prevention Center at Boston Medical Center to survey Massachusetts SNs to assess the usefulness of the guidelines. The response rate was 63%; 92% found the booklet extremely useful or moderately useful; and 70% endorsed that the booklet fostered collaboration among stakeholders.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Jennylee S. Swallow ◽  
Jacob R. Joseph ◽  
Kylene Willsey ◽  
Andrea A. Almeida ◽  
Matthew T. Lorincz ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe authors of recent concussion guidelines have sought to form a consensus on injury management, but it is unclear if they have been effective in conveying this information to the public. Many parents and athletes obtain medical recommendations via the Internet. This review is aimed at evaluating consistency between online resources and published guideline statements in postconcussion return-to-play (RTP) decisions.METHODSFive websites were selected through a Google search for RTP after concussion, including a federal government institution (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) website, a national high school association (National Federation of State High School Associations) website, a popular nationally recognized medical website for patients (WebMD), a popular parent-driven website for parents of children who participate in sports (MomsTeam), and the website of a private concussion clinic (Sports Concussion Institute), along with a university hospital website (University of Michigan Medicine). Eight specific items from the Zurich Sport Concussion Consensus Statement 2012 were used as the gold standard for RTP recommendations. Three independent reviewers graded each website for each of the 8 recommendations (A = states guideline recommendations appropriately; B = mentions guideline recommendation; C = does not mention guideline recommendation; F = makes inappropriate recommendation).RESULTSA grade of A was assigned for 45.8% of the recommendations, B for 25.0%, C for 25.0%, and F for 4.2%. All the websites were assigned an A grade for the recommendation of no RTP on the day of injury. Only 1 website (WebMD) mentioned medication usage in conjunction with the Zurich statement, and only 2 websites (Sports Concussion Institute and University of Michigan Medicine) mentioned appropriate management of persistent symptoms. None of these websites commented correctly on all 8 guideline recommendations.CONCLUSIONSOnline resources are inconsistent in relaying guideline recommendations for RTP and provide a potential source of confusion in the management of concussion for athletes and their parents, which can result in inappropriate RTP decisions.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 279-279
Author(s):  
Jennylee S Swallow ◽  
Jacob R Joseph ◽  
Kylene Willsey ◽  
Paul Park ◽  
Nicholas J Szerlip ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION While recent guidelines have hoped to form consensus regarding management of concussion, it is unclear if they have been effective in conveying this information to the public. Many parents and athletes obtain medical recommendations via the internet. This study aims to evaluate consistency between online resources and guideline statements in post-concussion return to play (RTP) decisions. METHODS Five websites were selected through a Google search for return to play after concussion. These websites represented a federal government institution (Centers for Disease Control, CDC); a national high school association website (National Federation of State High School Associations, NFHS); a popular nationally-recognized medical website for patients (WebMD); a University hospital (University of Michigan, UM); a popular parent-driven website for sports parents (MomsTeam, MT); as well as a website for a private concussion clinic (Sports Concussion Institute, SCI). The Zurich Sport Concussion Consensus Statement was used as the gold standard for RTP recommendations, and eight specific items identified. Three independent reviewers graded each website for each of the eight recommendations (A = states guideline recommendations appropriately; B = mentions guideline recommendation; C = does not mention guideline recommendation; F = inappropriate recommendation made). RESULTS >A grade of A was assigned for 45.8% of recommendations, B for 25.0%, C for 25.0%, and F for 4.2%. All websites were assigned grade A for recommendation of no return to play on the day of injury. Only 1 website (WebMD) commented on medication usage in conjunction with the Zurich Statement, and only 2 websites (SCI, UM) commented on management of persistent symptoms. No website correctly commented on all eight guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION Online resources are inconsistent in relaying guideline recommendations for RTP. This is a potential source of confusion in management of concussion for athletes and their parents which may result in inappropriate RTP.


Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (14 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S8.3-S9
Author(s):  
Joseph Clark ◽  
Jon Divine ◽  
Robert Mangine ◽  
Kimberly Hasselfeld ◽  
Aaron Keuhn-Himmler ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe object of this presentation is to supply the athletic trainer with data concerning a methodology that can be used to aid in designing a cardio conditioning regimen postconcussion as well as an exercise or lifting program postconcussion. This objective measure does not rely on subjective patient reports of symptoms and utilizes a reflex based assessment method.BackgroundSports concussion is a substantial concern for athletic trainers and there is a critical need to objectively and safely allow an athlete to return to play as soon as safely possible. Being able to make cogent recommendations as opposed to empirically trying something that has an intrinsic risk of eliciting symptoms or causing setbacks is urgently needed.Design/MethodsWe present data concerning 65 athletes (mean age 20.8 years) who were assessed. This was done while on an exercise bike going through a progression of exertion levels. The TERC Murmur was listened for every 2 minutes at the traditional carotid artery position.ResultsResults for cardio assessment. 73% of the cardio assessment subjects had a TERC Murmur at a heart rate of 127.2 bpm (± 16 SD). The transient exertion related carotid (TERC) murmur is a murmur that is heard at the carotid arteries during exercise. It normally is heard at around a heart rate of 150, but is heard a lower heart rates in concussion patients.ConclusionsThe clinical advantages of the use of the TERC murmur is that it can be applied by an athletic trainer with the training to listen for a blood pressure. It provides objective information concerning safe heart rates and target heart rate. Being able to safely recommend a means by which an athlete can condition (cardio and or lifting) will accelerate return to play as well as aid in keeping the athlete happy, healthy and engaged.


2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 1254-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Scherer ◽  
Margaret M. Weightman ◽  
Mary V. Radomski ◽  
Leslie F. Davidson ◽  
Karen L. McCulloch

Within the last decade, more than 220,000 service members have sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI) in support of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mild TBI may result in subtle cognitive and sensorimotor deficits that adversely affect warfighter performance, creating significant challenges for service members, commanders, and clinicians. In recent conflicts, physical therapists and occupational therapists have played an important role in evaluating service member readiness to return to duty (RTD), incorporating research and best practices from the sports concussion literature. Because premorbid (baseline) performance metrics are not typically available for deployed service members as for athletes, clinicians commonly determine duty readiness based upon the absence of postconcussive symptoms and return to “normal” performance on clinical assessments not yet validated in the military population. Although practices described in the sports concussion literature guide “return-to-play” determinations, resolution of symptoms or improvement of isolated impairments may be inadequate to predict readiness in a military operational environment. Existing clinical metrics informing RTD decision making are limited because they fail to emphasize functional, warrior task demands and they lack versatility to assess the effects of comorbid deficits. Recently, a number of complex task-oriented RTD approaches have emerged from Department of Defense laboratory and clinical settings to address this gap. Immersive virtual reality environments, field-based scenario-driven assessment programs, and militarized dual-task and multitask-based approaches have all been proposed for the evaluation of sensorimotor and cognitive function following TBI. There remains a need for clinically feasible assessment methods that can be used to verify functional performance and operational competence in a variety of practice settings. Complex and ecologically valid assessment techniques incorporating dual-task and multitask methods may prove useful in validating return-to-activity requirements in civilian and military populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document