A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Subsequent Malignant Neoplasm Risk After Radioactive Iodine Treatment of Thyroid Cancer

Thyroid ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1662-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Yun Yu ◽  
Omar Saeed ◽  
Alyse S. Goldberg ◽  
Shafaq Farooq ◽  
Rouhi Fazelzad ◽  
...  
Thyroid ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Sawka ◽  
Lehana Thabane ◽  
Luciana Parlea ◽  
Irada Ibrahim-Zada ◽  
Richard W. Tsang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Bosdou ◽  
P Anagnostis ◽  
P Florou ◽  
I Iakovou ◽  
G Grimbizis ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment in premenopausal women with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) affects ovarian reserve, as evaluated by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)? Summary answer AMH concentrations decreased at three, six and 12 months following RAI treatment in women with DTC, whereas no difference was observed regarding FSH. What is known already Thyroid cancer is the third most common type of female malignancy and DTC is the most common histopathological type. Thyroidectomy constitutes the mainstay of treatment for DTC, followed by administration of RAI, which acts as an adjuvant therapy to destroy residual cancerous thyroid tissue. However, the effect of RAI on ovarian reserve of these women, as assessed by AMH, AFC and FSH, remains controversial. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to identify studies evaluating the effect of RAI treatment on ovarian reserve in women with DTC. For this purpose, a literature search in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL was carried out until 06/12/2020. The primary outcome measure was the effect of RAI on ovarian reserve, as evaluated by AMH, AFC and FSH. Participants/materials, setting, methods Studies were eligible if they included premenopausal women with DTC, treated with a single RAI dose and assessed for at least one marker of ovarian reserve repeatedly within 12 months post-RAI.Meta-analysis of weighted data was performed using random effects model. Results were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Main results and the role of chance Four prospective eligible studies, published between 2005 and 2020, were eligible for the meta-analysis, evaluating a total of 154 women. The number of participants ranged from 24 to 50. The single dose of RAI used to treat DTC ranged from 50 to 150 mCi. AMH concentrations decreased at three (WMD -1.66 ng/ml, 95% CI -2.42 to -0.91, p < 0.0001; I2 0%), six (WMD -1.58 ng/ml, 95% CI -2.63 to -0.52, p = 0.003; I2 54.7%) and 12 months (WMD -1.62 ng/ml, 95% CI -2.02 to -1.22, p < 0.0001; I2 15.5%) following a single RAI dose compared with baseline (three studies; n = 104). With respect to FSH concentrations, no difference was observed at six (WMD +3.29 IU/l, 95% CI -1.12 to + 7.70, p = 0.14; I2 96.8%) and 12 months (WMD +0.13 IU/l, 95% CI -1.06 to + 1.32, p = 0.83; I2 55.2%) post-RAI compared with baseline (two studies; n = 83). No data on AFC was available. Limitations, reasons for caution The small number of studies and patients included, as well as the lack of data on AFC may have compromised the validity of the conclusions drawn. Moreover, subgroup analysis according to female age was not feasible, due to the lack of relevant data. Wider implications of the findings The negative effect of RAI on ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with DTC, as indicated by the decreased AMH, should be confirmed by data on AFC, which are currently not available. These findings necessitate close monitoring of ovarian reserve in such women, counselling them regarding the need for fertility preservation. Trial registration number N/A


Thyroid ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marceline W. Piek ◽  
Emily L. Postma ◽  
Rachel van Leeuwaarde ◽  
Jan Paul de Boer ◽  
Annelies M.E. Bos ◽  
...  

Thyroid ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1129-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Sawka ◽  
Irada Ibrahim-Zada ◽  
Philip Galacgac ◽  
Richard W. Tsang ◽  
James D. Brierley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A857-A858
Author(s):  
Ce Cheng ◽  
Chenyu Sun ◽  
He Zhou ◽  
Iloabueke Chineke ◽  
Ali McBride ◽  
...  

Abstract The association between radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy and reduced fertility has remained controversial, in part because no large-scale randomized clinical trials or prospective studies have been done in this regard. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to investigate the association between radioactive iodine therapy and birth rates in female patients in their reproductive years diagnosed with well- differentiated thyroid cancer. Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed Central and PubMed according to the established inclusion criteria, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Each article was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The overall relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the association between radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy and birth rates. Random effect or fixed-effect model was used to calculate the pooled OR, based on heterogeneity significance. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on different age groups (<25 years old vs. 25-34 years old vs. >35 years old). Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were also performed. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software (version 5.3; Cochrane library) and STATA 12.0 software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX), and all P values were two-tailed, the test level was 0.05. 105 articles were obtained from the database search, and 6 articles were obtained from other sources. Three articles involving 32237 participants were included. All studies were considered moderate to high quality. Overall, no statistically significant association was observed (RR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.71,1.48, p=0.91, I2=96%). In subgroup analysis, groups with age <24 y/o (RR 0.87; 95% CI:0.76,0.99,p= 0.04, I2=0%), and age >35 y/o (RR 0.71; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.85, p=0.0002, I2=0%), there was an associated reduction in birth rates in patients who received radioactive iodine treatment. In contrast, in the group between 25 and 34 years of age, no statistically significant observation was made (RR 0.99; 95% CI:0.79,1.22, p= 0.89, I2=82%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the result. Egger’s test, and Begg’s test found no publication bias of analysis (p= 0.824; p=0.602). This meta-analysis demonstrated that overall, no statistically significant association between RAI treatment and birth rates in female patients within their reproductive ages diagnosed with well- differentiated thyroid cancer. However, in the subgroup analysis, an association was found between RAI treatment and reduced birth rates in females <25 years old and those >35 years old. In contrast, no association of RAI treatment with birth rates in females 25-34 years old was found. More highly powered prospective studies of this topic are needed in the future to further elucidate the impact of RAI treatment on birth rates and fertility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document