scholarly journals Inhibition of Ribosome Recruitment Induces Stress Granule Formation Independently of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2α Phosphorylation

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 4212-4219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachid Mazroui ◽  
Rami Sukarieh ◽  
Marie-Eve Bordeleau ◽  
Randal J. Kaufman ◽  
Peter Northcote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation ◽  
As Stress ◽  
Cell Stress Response

Cytoplasmic aggregates known as stress granules (SGs) arise as a consequence of cellular stress and contain stalled translation preinitiation complexes. These foci are thought to serve as sites of mRNA storage or triage during the cell stress response. SG formation has been shown to require induction of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)2α phosphorylation. Herein, we investigate the potential role of other initiation factors in this process and demonstrate that interfering with eIF4A activity, an RNA helicase required for the ribosome recruitment phase of translation initiation, induces SG formation and that this event is not dependent on eIF2α phosphorylation. We also show that inhibition of eIF4A activity does not impair the ability of eIF2α to be phosphorylated under stress conditions. Furthermore, we observed SG assembly upon inhibition of cap-dependent translation after poliovirus infection. We propose that SG modeling can occur via both eIF2α phosphorylation-dependent and -independent pathways that target translation initiation.

Plant translation initiation factors: it is not easy to be green

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.S. Browning
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Translational Machinery ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors

Plants have significant differences in some of the ‘parts’ of the translational machinery. There are two forms of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F, eIF3 has two novel subunits, eIF4B is poorly conserved, and eIF2 kinases and eIF4E binding proteins (4E-BP) are yet to be discovered. These differences suggest that plants may regulate their translation in unique ways.

scholarly journals Uncoupling Stress Granule Assembly and Translation Initiation Inhibition

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2673-2683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Mokas ◽  
John R. Mills ◽  
Cristina Garreau ◽  
Marie-Josée Fournier ◽  
Francis Robert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Ribosomal Subunits ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation ◽  
Translation Initiation Factors ◽  
Dependent Pathway ◽  
Regulatory Sites

Cytoplasmic stress granules (SGs) are specialized regulatory sites of mRNA translation that form under different stress conditions known to inhibit translation initiation. The formation of SG occurs via two pathways; the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2α phosphorylation-dependent pathway mediated by stress and the eIF2α phosphorylation-independent pathway mediated by inactivation of the translation initiation factors eIF4A and eIF4G. In this study, we investigated the effects of targeting different translation initiation factors and steps in SG formation in HeLa cells. By depleting eIF2α, we demonstrate that reduced levels of the eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNAiMet ternary translation initiation complexes is sufficient to induce SGs. Likewise, reduced levels of eIF4B, eIF4H, or polyA-binding protein, also trigger SG formation. In contrast, depletion of the cap-binding protein eIF4E or preventing its assembly into eIF4F results in modest SG formation. Intriguingly, interfering with the last step of translation initiation by blocking the recruitment of 60S ribosome either with 2-(4-methyl-2,6-dinitroanilino)-N-methylpropionamideis or through depletion of the large ribosomal subunits protein L28 does not induce SG assembly. Our study identifies translation initiation steps and factors involved in SG formation as well as those that can be targeted without induction of SGs.

scholarly journals Defects in Translational Regulation Mediated by the α Subunit of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 Inhibit Antiviral Activity and Facilitate the Malignant Transformation of Human Fibroblasts

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2025-2040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren J. Perkins ◽  
Glen N. Barber
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
T Antigen ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 ◽  
Initiation Factor 2

ABSTRACT Suppression of protein synthesis through phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) is known to occur in response to many forms of cellular stress. To further study this, we have developed novel cell lines that inducibly express FLAG-tagged versions of either the phosphomimetic eIF2α variant, eIF2α-S51D, or the phosphorylation-insensitive eIF2α-S51A. These variants showed authentic subcellular localization, were incorporated into endogenous ternary complexes, and were able to modulate overall rates of protein synthesis as well as influence cell division. However, phosphorylation of eIF2α failed to induce cell death or sensitize cells to killing by proapoptotic stimuli, though it was able to inhibit viral replication, confirming the role of eIF2α in host defense. Further, although the eIF2α-S51A variant has been shown to transform NIH 3T3 cells, it was unable to transform the murine fibroblast 3T3 L1 cell line. To therefore clarify this issue, we explored the role of eIF2α in growth control and demonstrated that the eIF2α-S51A variant is capable of collaborating with hTERT and the simian virus 40 large T antigen in the transformation of primary human kidney cells. Thus, dysregulation of translation initiation is indeed sufficient to cooperate with defined oncogenic elements and participate in the tumorigenesis of human tissue.

scholarly journals Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2α-independent Pathway of Stress Granule Induction by the Natural Product Pateamine A

2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (43) ◽  
pp. 32870-32878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjun Dang ◽  
Nancy Kedersha ◽  
Woon-Kai Low ◽  
Daniel Romo ◽  
Myriam Gorospe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Stress Granules ◽  
Stress Granule ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Induced Stress ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation ◽  
Pateamine A

Stress granules are aggregates of small ribosomal subunits, mRNA, and numerous associated RNA-binding proteins that include several translation initiation factors. Stress granule assembly occurs in the cytoplasm of higher eukaryotic cells under a wide variety of stress conditions, including heat shock, UV irradiation, hypoxia, and exposure to arsenite. Thus far, a unifying principle of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α phosphorylation prior to stress granule formation has been observed from the majority of experimental evidence. Pateamine A, a natural product isolated from marine sponge, was recently reported to inhibit eukaryotic translation initiation and induce the formation of stress granules. In this report, the protein composition and fundamental progression of stress granule formation and disassembly induced by pateamine A was found to be similar to that for arsenite. However, pateamine A-induced stress granules were more stable and less prone to disassembly than those formed in the presence of arsenite. Most significantly, pateamine A induced stress granules independent of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α phosphorylation, suggesting an alternative mechanism of formation from that previously described for other cellular stresses. Taking into account the known inhibitory effect of pateamine A on eukaryotic translation initiation, a model is proposed to account for the induction of stress granules by pateamine A as well as other stress conditions through perturbation of any steps prior to the rejoining of the 60S ribosomal subunit during the entire translation initiation process.

scholarly journals Control of Cell Survival and Proliferation by Mammalian Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4B

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1478-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Shahbazian ◽  
Armen Parsyan ◽  
Emmanuel Petroulakis ◽  
Ivan Topisirovic ◽  
Yvan Martineau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Selective Reduction ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor

ABSTRACT Translation initiation plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The translation initiation factor eIF4B (eukaryotic initiation factor 4B) stimulates the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A in unwinding secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA in vitro. Here, we studied the effects of eIF4B depletion in cells using RNA interference (RNAi). In agreement with the role of eIF4B in translation initiation, its depletion resulted in inhibition of this step. Selective reduction of translation was observed for mRNAs harboring strong to moderate secondary structures in their 5′UTRs. These mRNAs encode proteins, which function in cell proliferation (Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC [ornithine decarboxylase]) and survival (Bcl-2 and XIAP [X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis]). Furthermore, eIF4B silencing led to decreased proliferation rates, promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis, and further sensitized cells to camptothecin-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival by regulating the translation of proliferative and prosurvival mRNAs.

scholarly journals The Leader Protein of Theiler's Virus Prevents the Activation of PKR

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Borghese ◽  
Frédéric Sorgeloos ◽  
Teresa Cesaro ◽  
Thomas Michiels
Keyword(s):  
Stress Granule ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Wild Type Virus ◽  
Granule Formation ◽  
Double Stranded Rna ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation ◽  
Leader Protein ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
L Proteins

ABSTRACT Leader (L) proteins encoded by cardioviruses are multifunctional proteins that contribute to innate immunity evasion. L proteins of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV), Saffold virus (SAFV), and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) were reported to inhibit stress granule assembly in infected cells. Here, we show that TMEV L can act at two levels in the stress granule formation pathway: on the one hand, it can inhibit sodium arsenite-induced stress granule assembly without preventing eIF2α phosphorylation and, thus, acts downstream of eIF2α; on the other hand, it can inhibit eucaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 2 (PKR) activation and the consequent PKR-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation. Interestingly, coimmunostaining experiments revealed that PKR colocalizes with viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells infected with L-mutant viruses but not in cells infected with the wild-type virus. Furthermore, PKR coprecipitated with dsRNA from cells infected with L-mutant viruses significantly more than from cells infected with the wild-type virus. These data strongly suggest that L blocks PKR activation by preventing the interaction between PKR and viral dsRNA. In infected cells, L also rendered PKR refractory to subsequent activation by poly(I·C). However, no interaction was observed between L and either dsRNA or PKR. Taken together, our results suggest that, unlike other viral proteins, L indirectly acts on PKR to negatively regulate its responsiveness to dsRNA. IMPORTANCE The leader (L) protein encoded by cardioviruses is a very short multifunctional protein that contributes to evasion of the host innate immune response. This protein notably prevents the formation of stress granules in infected cells. Using Theiler’s virus as a model, we show that L proteins can act at two levels in the stress response pathway leading to stress granule formation, the most striking one being the inhibition of eucaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 2 (PKR) activation. Interestingly, the leader protein appears to inhibit PKR via a novel mechanism by rendering this kinase unable to detect double-stranded RNA, its typical activator. Unlike other viral proteins, such as influenza virus NS1, the leader protein appears to interact with neither PKR nor double-stranded RNA, suggesting that it acts indirectly to trigger the inhibition of the kinase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document