Metrical Consonance and Dissonance: Definitions and Taxonomy

1999 ◽  
pp. 22-62
Author(s):  
Harald Krebs
1918 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine Frithiof Malmberg

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imre Lahdelma ◽  
Tuomas Eerola

The contrast between consonance and dissonance is a vital factor in making music emotionally meaningful. Consonance typically denotes perceived agreeableness and stability, while dissonance in turn disagreeableness and a need of resolution. The current research addresses the perception of consonance/dissonance in intervals and chords isolated from musical context. Experiment 1 explored the correlations between the seven most used concepts denoting consonance/dissonance across all the available (60) empirical studies published since 1883. The stimuli consisted of a representative continuum of consonance/dissonance. The results show that the concepts exhibit high correlations, albeit these are somewhat lower for non-musicians compared to musicians. In Experiment 2 the stimuli's cultural familiarity was divided into three levels, and the correlations between the pivotal concepts of Consonance, Tension, Harmoniousness, Pleasantness, and Preference were further examined. Familiarity affected the correlations drastically across both musicians and non-musicians, but in different ways. Tension maintained relatively high correlations with Consonance across musical expertise and familiarity levels. On the basis of the results a rigorous control for familiarity and musical expertise is recommended for all studies investigating the perception of consonance/dissonance. The findings help pinpoint how familiarity affects the perception of consonance/dissonance and demonstrates the pronounced effect of musical expertise on this.


2018 ◽  
pp. 158-185
Author(s):  
Richard K. Thomas

1981 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
Stephen Metz ◽  
Anne D. Pick ◽  
Marsha G. Unze

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lluis L. Trulla ◽  
Nicola Di Stefano ◽  
Alessandro Giuliani

1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Erling Wold ◽  
James Tenney

2004 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Cohn

Early twentieth-century psychological theorists (Ernst Jentsch, Sigmund Freud) associated the uncanny with the occlusion of the boundary between real and imaginary, and with the defamiliarization of the familiar. Their music-theoretic contemporaries (Heinrich Schenker, Ernst Kurth, Alfred Lorenz) associated reality with consonance, imagination with dissonance. Late Romantic composers frequently depicted uncanny phenomena (in opera, song, and programmatic instrumental music) through hexatonic poles, a triadic juxtaposition that inherently undermines the consonant status of one or both constituents. Quintessentially familiar harmonies become defamiliarized liminal phenomena that hover between consonance and dissonance, thereby embodying the characteristics they are called upon by composers to depict. Examples of uncanny triadic juxtapositions are drawn from music of Gesualdo, Monteverdi, Haydn, Wagner, Mahler, Grieg, Richard Strauss, Sibelius, Puccini, Ravel, and Schoenberg.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document