Life course approaches to the genetic epidemiology of mental illness

Author(s):  
Elise B. Robinson ◽  
Lauren M. McGrath ◽  
Susan L. Santangelo
2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah K. Padgett ◽  
Bikki Tran Smith ◽  
Benjamin F. Henwood ◽  
Emmy Tiderington

Author(s):  
Karestan C. Koenen ◽  
Sasha Rudenstine ◽  
Ezra Susser ◽  
Sandro Galea
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaylin Ratner ◽  
Jane Mendle ◽  
Anthony L. Burrow ◽  
Felix Thoemmes

We investigated reciprocity between depressive symptoms and a novel construct called derailment, which indexes perceived changes in identity and self-direction. People who are “derailed” have trouble reconciling how their life course has unfolded over time and, as a result, do not easily identify with their former self. College students ( N = 939) participated in a preregistered, four-wave longitudinal study over one academic year. Depression positively predicted subsequent derailment across all components of the model, suggesting that perceived disruptions in life course may occur in response to elevated depressive symptoms. Contrary to predictions, derailment negatively predicted later depression across most waves, indicating that felt changes in identity and self-direction could buffer against downstream mood deteriorations. Although our findings did not support reciprocity, prospective evidence that perceived instability of identity and self-direction relate to an increase in depressive symptoms positions derailment as a new and potentially important facet of the depressive phenotype.


2020 ◽  
pp. 195-224
Author(s):  
Phillip Shon

Despite the nominative classification of parricides based on the victim–offender relationship, parricide bears the offense characteristics of many crimes. In prior works, the killing of parents has been framed as a violent reaction of severely abused children against their tormentors, or as the identity demarcating actions of adult sons suffering from mental illness. Aside from these two primary discourses, the reasons parents and their offspring become mired in conflicts across various life stages of both participants have been neglected from the literature. A more recent theoretical framework examines parricides and their sources of conflict across the life course of the victims and offenders. This paper synthesizes the sources of conflict in parricides in nineteen-century America and twentiethcentury South Korea by comparing the similarities and differences in offense characteristics. I argue that parricides in the two countries can be differentiated based on the differences in history and culture.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 905-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Lounds Taylor ◽  
Jan S. Greenberg ◽  
Marsha Mailick Seltzer ◽  
Frank J. Floyd

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Mosing ◽  
Bronwyn Brew ◽  
Alison Gibberd ◽  
Malin Ericsson ◽  
Kelli Lehto ◽  
...  

Abstract Focus and outcomes for participants Long periods between exposures and outcomes pose a number of challenges for life course epidemiological research, including unmeasured confounding factors (e.g.; familial factors) and mediation by other covariates, which make it difficult to unequivocally establish associations let alone causality. In this symposium we will present a number of different studies based on big data utilizing a variety of methods to overcome some of the issues encountered in research across long time frames or generations. Our focus will be on the different methods, the solutions they provide as well as their limitations. The methods presented were applied in the context of life course epidemiology and include: mediation analyses; genetic epidemiology; well-established and novel family designs including twins, siblings and cousins, and a method comparable to Mendelian randomization - ICE FALCON (Inference on Causation from Examination of Familial Confounding) which is part of a more general approach called ICE CRiSTAL (Inference on Causation from Examining Changes in Regression coefficients in STatistical AnaLsyes). The intended outcomes for the audience are to increase awareness of the challenges imposed by the data frequently used in this field of research and present possible solutions to (at least partly) address those. It is our intention to generate discussion and encourage other researchers to share their experiences and solutions to increase knowledge collectively. Rationale for the symposium, including for its inclusion in the Congress The main theme of the conference is ‘Methodological Innovations in Epidemiology’. Our symposium includes six different methods to strengthen causal inferences in epidemiology. While some of the presented methods are well established in classic epidemiology research (i.e. mediation analyses), others are more commonly found in different disciplines such as the expanding genetic epidemiology field (e.g. alternative twin designs and measured genetic risk approaches). In addition, we are presenting a new method for making inference about causation developed by Prof. John Hopper and Dr Shuai Li and co-workers called ICE FALCON, which applies to twin and family data and is part of a more general approach called ICE CRiSTAL. These methods use observational data to infer or rebut causality between measured variables, similar to Mendelian randomization (without relying on genetic information or strong assumptions). All the work presented is either nearing publication or has been published in the last two years and each presenter is intimately involved with the analysis and methods they will be presenting. Beyond a range of methods and study designs we have also a diversity of researchers and research questions in our symposium by including: researchers at different stages in their career and from around the world (ranging from early Postdoctoral Fellows over Senior Research Fellows/Assistant professors to Professors); a variety of research questions and diseases; and a range of population context including Indigenous Australians, babies, children, and adults, in order to appeal to a wider audience. Presentation program 6 talks of 8 minutes each with 2 minutes for questions followed by a general discussion facilitated by the chair. Names of presenters Dr Miriam A Mosing1,2


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document