Critical Media Literacy in Teacher Education, Theory, and Practice

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Share ◽  
Tatevik Mamikonyan ◽  
Eduardo Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Media Literacy ◽  
Social Transformation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Media Education ◽  
Critical Education ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
K 12 ◽  
Media And Technology

Democracy in the digital networked age of “fake news” and “alternative facts” requires new literacy skills and critical awareness to read, write, and use media and technology to empower civic participation and social transformation. Unfortunately, not many educators have been prepared to teach students how to think critically with and about the media and technology that engulf us. Across the globe there is a growing movement to develop media and information literacy curriculum (UNESCO) and train teachers in media education (e-Media Education Lab), but these attempts are limited and in danger of co-optation by the faster growing, better financed, and less critical education and information technology corporations. It is essential to develop a critical response to the new information communication technologies that are embedded in all aspects of society. The possibilities and limitations are vast for teaching educators to enter K-12 classrooms and teach their students to use various media, critically question all types of texts, challenge problematic representations, and create alternative messages. Through applying a critical media literacy framework that has evolved from cultural studies and critical pedagogy, students at all grade levels can learn to critically analyze the messages and create their own alternative media. The voices of teachers engaging in this work can provide pragmatic insight into the potential and challenges of putting the theory into practice in K-12 public schools.

Critical Media Literacy as Transformative Pedagogy

2016 ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Funk ◽  
Douglas Kellner ◽  
Jeff Share
Keyword(s):  
Information And Communication Technologies ◽  
Media Literacy ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Critical Approach ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Multiple Identity ◽  
Dominant Ideologies ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
Historical Trajectory ◽  
K 12

This chapter provides a theoretical framework of critical media literacy (CML) pedagogy and examples of practical implementation in K-12 and teacher education. It begins with a brief discussion of literature indicating the need for educators to use a critical approach to media. The historical trajectory of CML and key concepts are then reviewed. Following this, the myths of “neutrality” and “normalcy” in education and media are challenged. The chapter takes a critical look at information and communication technologies and popular culture, reviewing how they often reinforce and occasionally challenge dominant ideologies. Next, this critical perspective is used to explore how CML interrogates the ways media tend to position viewers, users, and audiences to read and negotiate meanings about race, class, gender, and the multiple identity markers that privilege dominant groups. The subjective and ubiquitous nature of media is highlighted to underscore the transformative potential of CML to use media tools for promoting critical thinking and social justice in the classroom.

scholarly journals Critical Media Literacy after the Media

Comunicar ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (38) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Kendall ◽  
Julian McDougall
Keyword(s):  
Media Literacy ◽  
Social Practice ◽  
Media Education ◽  
Reading Practices ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Temporal Shift ◽  
Cultura Popular ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
The Media ◽  
Wrong Place

This article questions the relationships between literacy, media literacy and media education. In the process, we connect the findings from a range of our ethnographic research and use these to propose new forms of practice for critical media literacy. By ‘after the media’, we do not posit a temporal shift (that ‘the media’ has ceased to be). Instead, we conceive of this as akin to the postmodern – a way of thinking (and teaching) that resists recourse to the idea of ‘the media’ as external to media literate agents in social practice. The preservation of an unhelpful set of precepts for media education hinder the project of media literacy in the same way as the idea of ‘literature’ imposes alienating reading practices in school. Just as the formal teaching of English has obstructed the development of critical, powerful readers by imposing an alienating and exclusive model of what it means to be a reader, so has Media Studies obscured media literacy. Despite ourselves, we have undermined the legitimation of studying popular culture as an area by starting out from the wrong place. This incomplete project requires the removal of ‘the media’ from its gaze. The outcomes of our research thus lead us to propose a ‘pedagogy of the inexpert’ as a strategy for critical media literacy. En este trabajo se reflexiona sobre las relaciones entre alfabetización, alfabetización mediática y educación para los medios, relacionándolas con los hallazgos de diferentes investigaciones etnográficas, a fin de proponer nuevas formas de práctica para la alfabetización crítica en los medios. Vivimos en la postmodernidad, en la era «después de los medios» –y no es que ya no existan los medios–, sino que, por el contrario, surge una forma de pensar –y enseñar– que se resiste a la idea de considerar los medios como algo ajeno a la ciudadanía en la vida cotidiana. Para el autor, la permanencia de preceptos y prácticas anquilosadas sobre educación en los medios dificulta la puesta en marcha de proyectos de alfabetización mediática, al igual que una visión tradicionalista de la literatura genera prácticas viciadas de lectura en el aula. La enseñanza formal de la lengua ha obstaculizado el desarrollo de lectores críticos y competentes, imponiendo un modelo de lector unidimensional. Igualmente, los estudios mediáticos han ensombrecido la alfabetización en los medios, subestimando la legitimidad del estudio de la cultura popular en sí misma desde un punto de partida erróneo. La educación en medios es aun una asignatura pendiente y requiere un cambio de perspectiva. En este artículo, fruto de investigaciones, se propone una «pedagogía del inexperto» como estrategia para la alfabetización crítica en los medios.

Critical Media Literacy as Transformative Pedagogy

2019 ◽  
pp. 318-348
Author(s):  
Steven Funk ◽  
Douglas Kellner ◽  
Jeff Share
Keyword(s):  
Information And Communication Technologies ◽  
Media Literacy ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Critical Approach ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Multiple Identity ◽  
Dominant Ideologies ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
Historical Trajectory ◽  
K 12

This chapter provides a theoretical framework of critical media literacy (CML) pedagogy and examples of practical implementation in K-12 and teacher education. It begins with a brief discussion of literature indicating the need for educators to use a critical approach to media. The historical trajectory of CML and key concepts are then reviewed. Following this, the myths of “neutrality” and “normalcy” in education and media are challenged. The chapter takes a critical look at information and communication technologies and popular culture, reviewing how they often reinforce and occasionally challenge dominant ideologies. Next, this critical perspective is used to explore how CML interrogates the ways media tend to position viewers, users, and audiences to read and negotiate meanings about race, class, gender, and the multiple identity markers that privilege dominant groups. The subjective and ubiquitous nature of media is highlighted to underscore the transformative potential of CML to use media tools for promoting critical thinking and social justice in the classroom.

Building a “Bridge” Between Theory and Practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 653-666
Author(s):  
Loren Saxton Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Media Literacy ◽  
Participatory Democracy ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Pedagogical Tool ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
Media Texts ◽  
Literacy Pedagogy

This chapter explores critical media literacy pedagogy. Using case study method, the author argues that The Washington Informer's, “Bridge” publication can be used as a practical pedagogical tool to teach students how to analyze and deconstruct media texts, and simultaneously inform students on how to produce alternative, counter-hegemonic media texts. This approach is consistent with literature on critical media literacy that calls for engaged and empowering pedagogy to encourage students to think critically about their roles in creating and maintaining a radical and participatory democracy.

Building a “Bridge” Between Theory and Practice

2018 ◽  
pp. 222-235
Author(s):  
Loren Saxton Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Media Literacy ◽  
Participatory Democracy ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Pedagogical Tool ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
Media Texts ◽  
Literacy Pedagogy

This chapter explores critical media literacy pedagogy. Using case study method, the author argues that The Washington Informer's, “Bridge” publication can be used as a practical pedagogical tool to teach students how to analyze and deconstruct media texts, and simultaneously inform students on how to produce alternative, counter-hegemonic media texts. This approach is consistent with literature on critical media literacy that calls for engaged and empowering pedagogy to encourage students to think critically about their roles in creating and maintaining a radical and participatory democracy.

scholarly journals A “Strong” Approach to Sustainability Literacy: Embodied Ecology and Media

Philosophies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Cary Campbell ◽  
Nataša Lacković ◽  
Alin Olteanu
Keyword(s):  
Media Literacy ◽  
Meaning Making ◽  
Environmental Literacy ◽  
Literacy Studies ◽  
Critical Media Literacy ◽  
Semiotic Approach ◽  
Sustainability Literacy ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Integrated Sustainability

This article outlines a “strong” theoretical approach to sustainability literacy, building on an earlier definition of strong and weak environmental literacy (Stables and Bishop 2001). The argument builds upon a specific semiotic approach to educational philosophy (sometimes called edusemiotics), to which these authors have been contributing. Here, we highlight how a view of learning that centers on embodied and multimodal communication invites bridging biosemiotics with critical media literacy, in pursuit of a strong, integrated sustainability literacy. The need for such a construal of literacy can be observed in recent scholarship on embodied cognition, education, media and bio/eco-semiotics. By (1) construing the environment as semiosic (Umwelt), and (2) replacing the notion of text with model, we develop a theory of literacy that understands learning as embodied/environmental in/across any mediality. As such, digital and multimedia learning are deemed to rest on environmental and embodied affordances. The notions of semiotic resources and affordances are also defined from these perspectives. We propose that a biosemiotics-informed approach to literacy, connecting both eco- and critical-media literacy, accompanies a much broader scope of meaning-making than has been the case in literacy studies so far.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document