scholarly journals Real-Time Intraoperative Consultation Reporting in the Electronic Health Record

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-393
Author(s):  
Molly E Klein ◽  
Joseph W Rudolf ◽  
Maryna Tarbunova ◽  
Tanya Jorden ◽  
Susanna R Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives We sought to make pathologists’ intraoperative consultation (IOC) results immediately available to the surgical team, other clinicians, and laboratory medicine colleagues to improve communication and decrease postanalytic errors. Methods We created an IOC report in our stand-alone laboratory information system that could be signed out prior to, and independent of, the final report, and transfer immediately to the electronic health record (EHR) as a preliminary diagnosis. We evaluated two metrics: preliminary (IOC) result review in the EHR by clinicians and postanalytic errors. Results We assessed 2,886 IOC orders from the first 22 months after implementation. Clinicians reviewed 1,956 (68%) of the IOC results while in preliminary status, including 1,399 (48%) within the first 24 hours. We evaluated 150 cases preimplementation and 300 cases postimplementation for discrepancies between the pathologist’s IOC result and the IOC result recorded by the surgeon in the operative note. Discrepancies dropped from 12 of 150 preimplementation to 6 of 150 and 7 of 150 in postimplementation years 1 and 2. One of the 25 discrepancies had a major clinical impact. Conclusions Real-time reporting of IOC results to the EHR reliably transmits results immediately to clinical teams. This strategy reduces but does not eliminate postanalytic interpretive errors by clinical teams.

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 519-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Kurant ◽  
Jason Baron ◽  
Genti Strazimiri ◽  
Kent Lewandrowski ◽  
Joseph Rudolf ◽  
...  

Objectives Laboratory-based utilization management programs typically rely primarily on data derived from the laboratory information system to analyze testing volumes for trends and utilization concerns. We wished to examine the ability of an electronic health record (EHR) laboratory orders database to improve a laboratory utilization program. Methods We obtained a daily file from our EHR containing data related to laboratory test ordering. We then used an automated process to import this file into a database to facilitate self-service queries and analysis. Results The EHR laboratory orders database has proven to be an important addition to our utilization management program. We provide three representative examples of how the EHR laboratory orders database has been used to address common utilization issues. We demonstrate that analysis of EHR laboratory orders data has been able to provide unique insights that cannot be obtained by review of laboratory information system data alone. Further, we provide recommendations on key EHR data fields of importance to laboratory utilization efforts. Conclusion We demonstrate that an EHR laboratory orders database may be a useful tool in the monitoring and optimization of laboratory testing. We recommend that health care systems develop and maintain a database of EHR laboratory orders data and integrate this data with their laboratory utilization programs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athena K. Petrides ◽  
Ida Bixho ◽  
Ellen M. Goonan ◽  
David W. Bates ◽  
Shimon Shaykevich ◽  
...  

Context.— A recent government regulation incentivizes implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) with computerized order entry and structured results display. Many institutions have also chosen to interface their EHR with their laboratory information system (LIS). Objective.— To determine the impact of an interfaced EHR-LIS on laboratory processes. Design.— We analyzed several different processes before and after implementation of an interfaced EHR-LIS: the turnaround time, the number of stat specimens received, venipunctures per patient per day, preanalytic errors in phlebotomy, the number of add-on tests using a new electronic process, and the number of wrong test codes ordered. Data were gathered through the LIS and/or EHR. Results.— The turnaround time for potassium and hematocrit decreased significantly (P = .047 and P = .004, respectively). The number of stat orders also decreased significantly, from 40% to 7% for potassium and hematocrit, respectively (P < .001 for both). Even though the average number of inpatient venipunctures per day increased from 1.38 to 1.62 (P < .001), the average number of preanalytic errors per month decreased from 2.24 to 0.16 per 1000 specimens (P < .001). Overall there was a 16% increase in add-on tests. The number of wrong test codes ordered was high and it was challenging for providers to correctly order some common tests. Conclusions.— An interfaced EHR-LIS significantly improved within-laboratory turnaround time and decreased stat requests and preanalytic phlebotomy errors. Despite increasing the number of add-on requests, an electronic add-on process increased efficiency and improved provider satisfaction. Laboratories implementing an interfaced EHR-LIS should be cautious of its effects on test ordering and patient venipunctures per day.


2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Calderwood ◽  
Richard Platt ◽  
Xuanlin Hou ◽  
Jessica Malenfant ◽  
Gillian Haney ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice J. Watson ◽  
Julia O'Rourke ◽  
Kamal Jethwani ◽  
Aurel Cami ◽  
Theodore A. Stern ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. e49
Author(s):  
Jason C. Fisher ◽  
Sabrina Lee ◽  
Vikashini Savadamuthu ◽  
Julio Garcia ◽  
Vivian Stellakis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document