scholarly journals EVALUATION OF THURICIDE/CORN OIL APPLICATIONS FOR CORN EARWORM MANAGEMENT ON SWEET CORN, 2007

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul McLeod
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Oil ◽  
Corn Earworm

scholarly journals Phytotoxicity and Pollination Disorders in Sweet Corn Due to Direct-silk Applications of Materials Used for Alternative Corn Earworm Control

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tori Lee Jackson ◽  
Mark G. Hutton ◽  
David T. Handley
Keyword(s):  
New England ◽  
Helicoverpa Zea ◽  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Oil ◽  
Corn Earworm ◽  
Soy Oil ◽  
Conventional Management ◽  
Repeated Applications ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Significant Injury

Corn earworm [CEW (Helicoverpa zea)] is one of the most important pests of sweet corn (Zea mays) in New England. Conventional management of this pest is achieved through repeated applications of chemical insecticides through the silking period. Organic growers, however, have few alternatives to prevent CEW infestation. Technology first developed in the 1930s and 1940s, using applications of mineral oil directly into the silk channel with an eyedropper, has been further researched in recent years using vegetable oils with and without pesticides, but pollination problems associated with these treatments have been observed. Several materials were evaluated for efficacy in controlling CEW populations and for phytotoxicity to the developing ear. Materials evaluated were corn oil, soy oil, carrageenan, corn oil mixed with Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki (Bt), soy oil mixed with Bt, and carrageenan mixed with Bt. All treatments were compared with an untreated control. Treatments provided a range of 33% to 50% control of CEW infestation. The oil and Bt combinations provided some reduction in infestation compared with the untreated controls (33% vs. 100% infestation), but this level of control was inadequate for all wholesale markets and most direct markets. Additionally, oil-based treatments also caused significant injury to developing ears by reducing pollination quality, impacting the development of the kernels at the ear tip. This condition referred to as “cone-tip” is of concern since it may decrease marketability. The percent unmarketable ears due to cone-tips ranged from 0% to 13% for the untreated and carrageenan-based treatments. From 12% to 42% of ears were unmarketable due to the soy oil treatments. Corn oil treatments caused 10% to 50% cone-tips.

scholarly journals Direct Silk Applications of Corn Oil and Bacillus thuringiensis as a Barrier to Corn Earworm Larvae in Sweet Corn

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Cook ◽  
Anne Carter ◽  
Pam Westgate ◽  
Ruth Hazzard
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Thuringiensis ◽  
Helicoverpa Zea ◽  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Oil ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Corn Earworm ◽  
Untreated Plot ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
First Instar ◽  
Almost All

Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 to rate the efficacy and longevity of four pesticide treatments against corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) larvae (CEW) in sweet corn (Zea mays). The four treatments used were 1) corn oil, 2) Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki (Bt), 3) oil + Bt, and 4) an untreated plot. All treatments were applied on silk day 5. Silk day 1 was the first day that more than 50% of the ears had 2.5 cm (1 inch) or more silks emerging from the husk using a hand-held pump applicator. Two first-instar CEW larvae were placed directly into silk channel of selected ears on 6 different days (days 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 after first silk). The same six ears were then harvested 4 days later. Untreated ears had more live CEW and higher levels of feeding damage than the other three treatments ears for all harvest days in both years. The number of CEW found per ear was lower when Bt was included in the treatment. The use of corn oil gave the lowest damage ratings on almost all harvest days in both years. Treatments which contained oil had the highest number of marketable ears in both years, but also the highest percentage of underdeveloped kernels at the tip of the ear (6% to 9%). The oil and Bt treatments appeared to control CEW for at least 17 days, from silking through maturity. This treatment regime appears to be a promising alternative for growers to conventional pest management methods.

scholarly journals Optimum Timing of an Application of Corn Oil and Bacillus thuringiensis to Control Lepidopteran Pests in Sweet Corn

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Cook ◽  
Anne Carter ◽  
Pamela Westgate ◽  
Ruth Hazzard
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Thuringiensis ◽  
Helicoverpa Zea ◽  
European Corn Borer ◽  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Oil ◽  
Corn Earworm ◽  
Larval Feeding ◽  
Corn Borer ◽  
Late Planting ◽  
All Treatment

Corn oil and Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. kurstaki (Bt) applied directly into the silk channel of a corn ear has been shown to be an effective pesticide against corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (CEW), and european corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (ECB). Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 to determine the influence of application timing on ear quality at harvest. Two blocks of corn were planted during each year to observe treatment effects under varying populations of the two insect species. The treatment consisted of 0.5 mL (0.017 floz) of food grade corn oil containing a suspension of Bt at 0.08 g (0.003 oz) a.i. per ear applied directly into the silk channel at the husk opening. One treatment application was made on each silk day 3 through 11 from first silk; silk day 1 was the first day that 50% or more of ears had 2.5 cm (1 inch) of silk protruding from the husk. One treatment did not receive the oil + Bt suspension. All ears were harvested at milk stage, on silk day 25. The number of CEW larvae in treated ears increased with later application days in 2000, but not in 2001. Damage from larval feeding was mainly found near the tip of the ear, and damage ratings were lower compared to untreated ears for all treatment days for both plantings in 2000, and through application day 8 in the late planting of 2001. ECB larvae were reduced for all treatment days in both plantings in 2000 and the late planting of 2001. The percentage of ears rated as marketable (i.e., free of feeding damage) ranged from 71% to 100% in treated plots compared to 30% to 77% in the untreated plots. There was a linear decrease in marketability with later application days in two of the four plantings. The greatest decrease in marketability was after application day 7. Because the oil application affects kernel development at the tip, the length of ear with under-developed kernels, or cone tip, was measured. The number of ears with cone tip decreased linearly with the later application days in all plantings. There was 10% conetip or less after day 7 in 2000 and day 6 in 2001. The best combination of effective insect control resulting in the highest rates of marketable ears with the least degree of cone tip was achieved in this experiment by application of oil + Bt suspension on day 7. Year to year variation in the environment would suggest a range from day 6 to 8.

scholarly journals Insecticide Efficacy Against Corn Earworm in Sweet Corn, 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Owens ◽  
Joseph Deidesheimer ◽  
Cody Stubbs
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Earworm ◽  
Insecticide Efficacy

scholarly journals CONTROL OF CORN EARWORM AND EUROPEAN CORN BORER ON SWEET CORN, 1998

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. O'Rourke ◽  
E. C. Burkness ◽  
W. D. Hutchison
Keyword(s):  
European Corn Borer ◽  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Earworm ◽  
Corn Borer

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF VOLIAM XPRESS FOR CONTROLLING CORN EARWORM ON SWEET CORN, 2009

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh T. Copes ◽  
F. Huang ◽  
J. W. Sharp ◽  
J. Temple ◽  
B.R. Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Earworm

scholarly journals Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Corn Earworm on Sweet Corn, 1997

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
Paul McLeod ◽  
R. W. Katayama
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Earworm

scholarly journals Foliar Insecticide Evaluation for Control of Corn Earworm on Sweet Corn, 1993

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
G. W. Zehnder ◽  
M. H. Hollingsworth ◽  
D. Hagemore
Keyword(s):  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Earworm

scholarly journals Evaluation of Efficacy of Selected Conventional and Experimental Insecticides and Bt Hybrids for Control of Corn Earworm and European Corn Borer on Sweet Corn, 1997

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-100
Author(s):  
J. T. Shaw ◽  
R. Weinzierl ◽  
J. W. Finger
Keyword(s):  
European Corn Borer ◽  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Corn Earworm ◽  
Compressed Air ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Corn Hybrids ◽  
Corn Borer ◽  
Chemical Treatments ◽  
Untreated Check ◽  
High Clearance

Abstract The tests were arranged in a RCB design with four replications. Each plot consisted of four rows, each being 30 inches wide and 50 ft long. Thirty-foot-wide alleys were established between the four replications. Insecticides were applied to the middle two rows of each plot, leaving two untreated rows between adjoining plots. Twelve insecticide treatments were compared with two Br-sweet corn hybrids (Heritage Bt and Bonus Bt) and their non-Bt isolines to two untreated controls. The 12 chemical treatments and the two untreated checks were planted with the Silver King variety sweet corn. Two untreated check plots were included in each replication and were averaged for the ANOVA. Treatments were applied very four to five days beginning on 8 Aug at 8% silk. All insecticide treatments were applied with a modified John Deere 6000 high-clearance vehicle (HCV) with a rear-mounted boom. Six Conejet (TX VS-8) hollow-cone nozzles (three per row) were calibrated to deliver 30.1 gpa at 40 psi and a speed of 2.5 mph, utilizing a compressed air system. Four nozzles (two per row) were attached to drops and directed the spray towards the ear zone area, a third nozzle (one per row) was mounted directly over the row with the spray being directed into the whorl (tassel) area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document