scholarly journals Fentanyl buccal soluble film (FBSF) for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1308-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Rauck ◽  
J. North ◽  
L.N. Gever ◽  
I. Tagarro ◽  
A.L. Finn
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9057-9057
Author(s):  
N. Slatkin ◽  
F. Xie ◽  
T. Segal ◽  
J. Messina

9057 Background: Episodes of cancer-related breakthrough pain (BTP) often peak in intensity in minutes. Pain relief with traditional, short-acting oral opioids is often not achieved for =30 min. Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) has a rapid onset of analgesia. This double- blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FBT in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer and BTP. Methods: After open-label titration to establish a successful dose of FBT, patients were randomized to prespecified, double-blinded sequences of 10 tablets (7 FBT, 3 placebo). Pain intensity (PI) was assessed from 5 to 120 min post dose. The primary efficacy measure was the sum of PI differences (PIDs) for the first 60 min (SPID60); secondary measures included PIDs, =33% and =50% improvements in PI, and global medication performance (GMP). Use of supplemental BTP medication and adverse events (AEs) were reported. Results: 129 patients were enrolled; 87/125 treated (70%) identified an effective FBT dose and entered the double-blind phase. SPID60 significantly favored FBT vs placebo (mean±SEM, 9.7±0.63 vs 4.9±0.50; p<0.0001). PID differed significantly vs placebo at 10 min (mean±SEM, 0.9±0.09 vs 0.5±0.09; p<0.0001) and at all time points through 2 hr (p<0.0001). Improvements in PI of =33% and =50% from baseline occurred in a larger proportion of episodes following FBT vs placebo from 10 min (16% vs 10% and 7% vs 4%, respectively; p<0.05) through 2 hr (74% vs 38% and 66% vs 28%; p<0.0001). Ratings of GMP were superior for FBT vs placebo at 60 and 120 min (p<0.0001). Supplemental opioids were required for approximately 3 times more BTP episodes following placebo compared with FBT. AEs were typical for opioids, e.g. nausea (13%), dizziness (11%), fatigue (8%), and constipation (6%). Application site-related AEs occurred in 12 patients (10%). A total of 11/125 (9%) patients had =1 serious AE; these were considered not/unlikely to be related to study drug. Conclusions: FBT was effective and well tolerated in the management of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related pain, with an early onset of analgesia and a sustained duration of effect. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 234-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harin Padma-Nathan ◽  
Jae Seung Pacik ◽  
Byoung Ok Ahn ◽  
Kyung Koo Kang ◽  
Mi Young Bahng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document