Fentanyl buccal tablet for the relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Simpson ◽  
John Messina ◽  
Fang Xie ◽  
Martin Hale
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9057-9057
Author(s):  
N. Slatkin ◽  
F. Xie ◽  
T. Segal ◽  
J. Messina

9057 Background: Episodes of cancer-related breakthrough pain (BTP) often peak in intensity in minutes. Pain relief with traditional, short-acting oral opioids is often not achieved for =30 min. Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) has a rapid onset of analgesia. This double- blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FBT in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer and BTP. Methods: After open-label titration to establish a successful dose of FBT, patients were randomized to prespecified, double-blinded sequences of 10 tablets (7 FBT, 3 placebo). Pain intensity (PI) was assessed from 5 to 120 min post dose. The primary efficacy measure was the sum of PI differences (PIDs) for the first 60 min (SPID60); secondary measures included PIDs, =33% and =50% improvements in PI, and global medication performance (GMP). Use of supplemental BTP medication and adverse events (AEs) were reported. Results: 129 patients were enrolled; 87/125 treated (70%) identified an effective FBT dose and entered the double-blind phase. SPID60 significantly favored FBT vs placebo (mean±SEM, 9.7±0.63 vs 4.9±0.50; p<0.0001). PID differed significantly vs placebo at 10 min (mean±SEM, 0.9±0.09 vs 0.5±0.09; p<0.0001) and at all time points through 2 hr (p<0.0001). Improvements in PI of =33% and =50% from baseline occurred in a larger proportion of episodes following FBT vs placebo from 10 min (16% vs 10% and 7% vs 4%, respectively; p<0.05) through 2 hr (74% vs 38% and 66% vs 28%; p<0.0001). Ratings of GMP were superior for FBT vs placebo at 60 and 120 min (p<0.0001). Supplemental opioids were required for approximately 3 times more BTP episodes following placebo compared with FBT. AEs were typical for opioids, e.g. nausea (13%), dizziness (11%), fatigue (8%), and constipation (6%). Application site-related AEs occurred in 12 patients (10%). A total of 11/125 (9%) patients had =1 serious AE; these were considered not/unlikely to be related to study drug. Conclusions: FBT was effective and well tolerated in the management of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related pain, with an early onset of analgesia and a sustained duration of effect. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M Rosenow ◽  
Christopher Gilmore ◽  
Brian M Ilfeld ◽  
Sean Li ◽  
Mehul J Desai ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Over 85% of patients experience residual limb (RLP) and/or phantom limb (PLP) pain following amputation. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a non-opioid approach to relieve postamputation neuropathic pain. A recent multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a novel percutaneous PNS system demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in pain and pain interference with PNS compared to placebo (Gilmore et al, 2019). This work presents prospective 1-yr follow-up to assess durability of pain relief and functional improvements. METHODS Over 85% of patients experience residual limb (RLP) and/or phantom limb (PLP) pain following amputation. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a non-opioid approach to relieve post-amputation neuropathic pain. A recent multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a novel percutaneous PNS system demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in pain and pain interference with PNS compared to placebo (Gilmore et al, 2019). This work presents prospective one-year follow-up to assess durability of pain relief and functional improvements. RESULTS A significantly greater proportion of subjects who completed the 12-mo visit reported = 50% pain relief on the BPI-SF (5/8, 63%; average pain relief = 73% among responders) compared to the placebo group at the time of crossover (0/14, 0%, P = .003; average pain relief = 23%). A majority of subjects also reported = 50% reductions in pain interference at 12 mo (5/8, 63%). Two of 13 (15%) subjects in the placebo group reported sustained improvements in pain interference (P = .06). Average reduction in pain interference among responders in the PNS group was 87%. CONCLUSION This work suggests that PNS delivered over 60 d may provide clinically significant and enduring pain relief, enabling improved function and potentially reducing the need for a permanently implanted system.


2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 826-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheena K. Aurora ◽  
Todd D. Rozen ◽  
Shashidhar H. Kori ◽  
Stephen B. Shrewsbury

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document