scholarly journals Phase III trial of CHOP-21 versus CHOP-14 for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study, JCOG 9809

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ohmachi ◽  
K. Tobinai ◽  
Y. Kobayashi ◽  
K. Itoh ◽  
M. Nakata ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 3135-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Davis ◽  
Antonio J. Grillo-López ◽  
Christine A. White ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Myron S. Czuczman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of re-treatment with rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who relapsed after a response to rituximab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled onto this study, and two were re-treated within the study. Patients received an intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m2 of rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. All patients had at least two prior therapies and had received at least one prior course of rituximab, with a median interval of 14.5 months between rituximab courses. RESULTS: Most adverse experiences (AEs) were transient grade 1 or 2 events occurring during the treatment period. Clinically significant myelosuppression was not observed; hematologic toxicity was generally mild and reversible. No patient developed human antichimeric antibodies after treatment. The type, frequency, and severity of AEs in this study were not apparently different from those reported in the phase III trial of rituximab. The overall response rate in 57 assessable patients was 40% (11% complete response and 30% partial responses). Median time to progression (TTP) in responders and median duration of response (DR) have not been reached, but Kaplan-Meier estimated medians are 17.8 months (range, 5.4+ to 26.6 months) and 16.3 months (range, 3.7+ to 25.1 months), respectively. These estimated medians are longer than the medians achieved in the patients’ prior course of rituximab (TTP and DR of 12.4 and 9.8 months, respectively, P > .1) and in a previously reported phase III trial (TTP in responders and DR of 13.2 and 11.6 months, respectively). Responses are ongoing in seven of 23 responders. CONCLUSION: In this re-treatment population, safety and efficacy were not apparently different from those after initial rituximab exposure.


2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2140-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Papaxoinis ◽  
Sotirios Papageorgiou ◽  
Dimitra Rontogianni ◽  
Vassiliki Kaloutsi ◽  
George Fountzilas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document