scholarly journals Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first-line sorafenib: Patient reported outcome results across two phase III studies (REACH-2 and REACH)

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii208 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.X. Zhu ◽  
R.S. Finn ◽  
P.R. Galle ◽  
J.M. Llovet ◽  
J.F. Blanc ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (S3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Weinmann ◽  
P.R. Galle

 The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib was the only approved systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) for about a decade. In recent years, the number of approved agents has increased significantly as a result of a number of positive phase iii clinical trials. Lenvatinib as a first-line treatment, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab in the second-line setting are now approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (fda) and the European Medicines Agency. In phase ii studies, immunotherapy with nivolumab and monotherapy using pembrolizumab yielded impressive results for overall survival in therapy-naïve and pretreated patients, leading to the accelerated approval by the fda of nivolumab and pembrolizumab for second-line treatment. However, phase iii trials of nivolumab in the first line and pembrolizumab in the second line as single agents failed to reach statistical significance, although clinical benefit for a subset of patients with long durations of response could be demonstrated. Despite that setback, immunotherapy for hcc is a promising therapeutic approach, and the combination of immunotherapy with other treatment modal­ities such as monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or local therapies has the potential to increase the overall response rate and survival. Recently, the results of a phase iii trial of combination atezolizumab–bevacizumab compared with sorafenib showed a highly significant survival benefit and median overall survival that was not reached in the immunotherapy arm, making the combination the preferred standard of care in first-line therapy. Despite the impressive results and generally good toxicity profile of immunotherapy, patients who respond to therapy constitute only a subset of the overall population, and response rates are still limited. This review focuses on the currently reported results and ongoing clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitor–based immunotherapy in hcc.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 320-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
Kenta Motomura ◽  
Izumi Ohno ◽  
Manabu Morimoto ◽  
...  

320 Background: Ramucirumab (RAM), a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, inhibits ligand activation of VEGFR2. REACH and REACH-2 were two global, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled multicenter, phase III studies of RAM versus PBO in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib. REACH-2 confirmed RAM treatment benefit for patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, consistent with results in a prespecified subgroup of patients in REACH with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. Methods: Other than AFP levels, study designs and eligibility for both studies were similar. All patients received RAM (8 mg/kg) I.V. or PBO every 14 days. Pooled analyses were performed to further support the assessments of efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. Results: In total, 101 Japanese patients were pooled from REACH and REACH-2 (n = 61 RAM; n = 40 PBO). Pooled baseline patient characteristics were balanced between arms including baseline AFP and etiology. As in the individual studies, improvement in OS (median OS 10.78 vs 4.47 mo; HR 0.555; 95% CI 0.348, 0.885; p = .0124) was observed. Improvements in PFS (median PFS 3.88 vs 1.41 mo; HR 0.341; 95% CI 0.212, 0.550; p < .0001), ORR (9.8% vs 2.5%, p = .1285), and disease control rate (67.2% vs 35.0%, p = .0035) were also observed. Consistent with individual study results, hypertension was the only grade 3 or higher adverse events of special interest among ≥ 5% patients that was more frequently observed in the RAM arm (13.1%) compared with the PBO arm (5.0%). Conclusions: Pooled analysis of two phase III trials of RAM as second-line treatment in patients with HCC following first-line sorafenib demonstrated a clinically meaningful benefit with a manageable safety profile in Japanese HCC patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. Treatment benefits in OS observed in the Japanese subpopulation were consistent with the entire population (median OS 8.1 vs 5.0 mo; HR 0.694; p = .0002. Zhu AX et al., World GI 2018). Further analysis to characterize the Japanese patients compared to the non-Japanese population is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01140347 (REACH), NCT02435433 (REACH-2).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document