scholarly journals Safety and clinical activity of MEDI0562, a humanized OX40 agonist monoclonal antibody, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii410 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Glisson ◽  
R. Leidner ◽  
R.L. Ferris ◽  
J. Powderly ◽  
N.A. Rizvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

scholarly journals Safety and Clinical Activity of MEDI0562, a Humanized OX40 Agonist Monoclonal Antibody, in Adult Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (20) ◽  
pp. 5358-5367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie S. Glisson ◽  
Rom S. Leidner ◽  
Robert L. Ferris ◽  
John Powderly ◽  
Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

scholarly journals Phase 1 study of MEDI0562, a humanized OX40 agonist monoclonal antibody (mAb), in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi361 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.S. Glisson ◽  
R. Leidner ◽  
R.L. Ferris ◽  
J. Powderly ◽  
N. Rizvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 Study

A phase I study of lirilumab (BMS-986015), an anti-KIR monoclonal antibody, administered in combination with ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody, in patients (Pts) with select advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3106-TPS3106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Geoffrey Thomas Gibney ◽  
Erin Marie Bertino ◽  
Sarah A. Cooley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Adaptive Immunity ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Innate And Adaptive Immunity

TPS3106 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade represents a novel form of cancer immunotherapy. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) are immune receptors that down-regulate NK and T cell activity, respectively. The anti-KIR antibody, lirilumab (BMSE986015), potentiates innate immunity by blocking signaling through inhibitory KIRs and has demonstrated modest side effects in a Phase I trial. The anti-CTLA-4 antibody, ipilimumab, potentiates adaptive immunity and has demonstrated improved overall survival in pts with advanced melanoma and preliminary evidence of clinical activity in Phase I and II trials. We hypothesized that coordinate modulation of innate and adaptive immunity by combining anti-KIR and anti-CTLA4 antibodies could achieve enhanced biologic and clinical activity compared to either agent alone. Here, we describe a Phase I study of lirilumab plus ipilimumab in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: This study will be performed in two parts and enroll approximately 150 pts. During dose escalation, pts with advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and castrate resistant prostate cancer, will be enrolled. During cohort expansion, 20 pts with each tumor type will be enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), or the maximum administered dose, if no MTD is defined. The primary study objectives are to delineate the safety and tolerability, dose limiting toxicities, and MTD of this combination. Secondary objectives are to assess preliminary anti-tumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of this combination in all pts, and the pharmacodynamic effects on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in a cohort of melanoma pts. Exploratory objectives include a thorough assessment of the modulation of innate and adaptive immunity by this combination in peripheral blood and/or tumor specimens, and preliminary evaluation of the association of these changes with clinical outcome. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01750580 Clinical trial information: NCT01750580.

287 Safety and antitumor activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) inhibitor KHK2455 in combination with anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A313-A314
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Timothy Yap ◽  
David Hong ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dependent

BackgroundIDO-1 inhibitors have shown antitumor activity in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in multiple cancers. KHK2455 is a novel and selective oral IDO-1 inhibitor. KHK2455 inhibits IDO-1 apo-enzyme, with long-lasting and potent activity. Mogamulizumab is an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody that has shown synergy with KHK2455 in preclinical models. Mogamulizumab is approved in the US and EU for treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.MethodsIn this first-in-human study, patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating oral doses of KHK2455 alone (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg once daily) for 4 weeks (Cycle 0), followed by combination with 1 mg/kg weekly of IV mogamulizumab for 4 weeks (Cycle 1), and then on Days 1 and 15 (from Cycle 2 onward) in a standard 3+3 Phase I design. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and IDO activity (kynurenine [Kyn] and tryptophan [Trp] levels and ex vivo Kyn production) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled across all cohorts. One patient with lower esophageal cancer in the 100 mg cohort exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 gastrointestinal necrosis). The most frequent (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented in table 1. Overall numbers of TEAEs, ≥Grade 3 TEAEs, and serious TEAEs related to KHK2455 and mogamulizumab are presented in table 2. Serious KHK2455-related TEAEs included gastrointestinal necrosis (KHK2455 monotherapy), and nausea and drug eruption (combination therapy). In addition, five drug-related TEAEs in combination therapy led to discontinuation; there were no fatal outcomes related to either study drug. Plasma KHK2455 concentrations reached steady state by Day 8 (Cycle 0) and increased dose-dependently. Potent dose-dependent inhibition of IDO activity was demonstrated by plasma Kyn concentration and Kyn/Trp ratio (median inhibition 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively, at 100 mg dose on Day 15, compared to baseline) and ex vivo Kyn production (>95% inhibition at ≥10 mg KHK2455), confirming target modulation. Six of 26 evaluable patients from all dosing groups achieved durable disease stabilization (≥6 months, RECIST 1.1), and one patient with bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma demonstrated confirmed partial response (43.5% tumor reduction over a 2-year observation period). Median overall survival was 13.4 months, with 30% of subjects surviving for 2 years or longer (figure 1).Abstract 287 Table 1Study 2455-001: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (≥10% by Preferred Term)Abstract 287 Table 2Abstract 287 Figure 1Study 2455-001: Overall SurvivalConclusionsKHK2455 in combination with mogamulizumab was well-tolerated and manageable at all doses tested, suppressed Kyn production in a dose-dependent and sustained manner, and demonstrated signals of antitumor activity. These data support the continued development of this combination.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Susan E. Johnson, PhD, S.E. Johnson Consulting, LLC, New Hope, PA, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT02867007 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Ethics Committees at all participating study institutions.

scholarly journals Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Siu ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Shilpa Gupta ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundMEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsEligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.ResultsFrom November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.ConclusionIT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02556463.

scholarly journals 412 First-in-human phase I/IIa trial to evaluate the safety and initial clinical activity of DuoBody®-PD-L1×4–1BB (GEN1046) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A437-A437
Author(s):  
Elena Garralda ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Eytan Ben-Ami ◽  
Corinne Maurice-Dror ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Dose Levels

BackgroundAgonistic 4-1BB monoclonal antibodies were preclinically validated as promising cancer immunotherapies, both as monotherapy and as potentiators of the activity of PD-(L)1–blocking agents. However, toxicity and a narrow therapeutic window have hampered their clinical development. DuoBody-PD­-L1×4-1BB, a first-in-class, bispecific, next-generation checkpoint immunotherapy, was designed to overcome these limitations by activating T cells through conditional 4-1BB costimulation, while simultaneously blocking the PD-L1 axis. We present preliminary data from the ongoing, first-in-human, open-label, phase I/IIa trial of DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB in advanced solid tumors (NCT03917381).MethodsDuring dose escalation, patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors not eligible for standard therapy received flat-dose DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB (25–1200 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters and antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1). Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and antitumor activity (iRECIST) were assessed as exploratory endpoints.ResultsAs of June 22, 2020, 61 patients were enrolled (median age: 59 years). The most common cancer types were colorectal (19.7%), ovarian (14.8%), pancreatic (9.8%), and NSCLC (9.8%). Patients had previously received a median (range) of 3 (1–11) treatments; 44.2% had prior anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. Patients received a median (range) of 4 (1–15) treatment cycles; Cmax was observed shortly after the end of infusion (mean T½: 2.3–10.3 days). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 6 patients experienced DLTs. The most common (=10%) treatment-related AEs (all grades; grades 3–4) were transaminase elevation (24.6%; 9.8%), hypothyroidism (16.4%; 1.6%), and fatigue (13.1%; 1.6%). Treatment-related grade-3 transaminase elevations decreased upon corticosteroid administration; no treatment-related bilirubin increases or grade-4 transaminase elevations occurred. Disease control, including stable disease at first assessment and partial responses in triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–pretreated NSCLC, occurred in 40/61 patients (65.6%). Pharmacologic activity, as measured by modulation of adaptive immunity mediators, was observed across a broad range of dose levels. Peripheral proliferating (Ki67+) CD8+ effector memory T cells and serum interferon-gamma levels showed maximum induction relative to baseline (p=0.01) 8 days following treatment.ConclusionsDuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB demonstrated biologic activity and a manageable safety profile. Encouraging early clinical activity across different dose levels was observed in a heavily pretreated population with advanced solid tumors, including those resistant to prior immunotherapy or typically less sensitive to ICIs. Expansion cohorts of patients for whom DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB treatment could be relevant and biologically sound have started enrollment. Updated data will be presented.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Manish Gupta, Lei Pang, and Thomas Breuer at Genmab A/S; Alice Bexon, Alexander Muik, and Friederike Gieseke at BioNTech SE; and Zuzana Jirakova (formerly at BioNTech SE) for their valuable contributions. This trial was funded by Genmab A/S and BioNTech SE.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov; trial number: NCT03917381Ethics ApprovalThis trial is undertaken following full approval of the final protocol, amendments, informed consent form, applicable recruiting materials, and subject compensation programs by the Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board.ConsentWritten informed consent, in accordance with principles that originated in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, current ICH guidelines including ICH-GCP E6(R2), applicable regulatory requirements, and sponsor policy, was provided by the patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document