Analgesic Efficacy of Nerve Blocks After Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1208-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M Vonu ◽  
Paul Campbell ◽  
Noah Prince ◽  
Bruce A Mast
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Quadratus Lumborum ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background A variety of regional nerve blocks have been utilized in abdominoplasty procedures, including transversus abdominis plane (TAP), intercostal, rectus sheath (RS), pararectus + ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric, quadratus lumborum, and paravertebral blocks. No consensus exists regarding the most effective nerve block modality in optimizing postprocedural comfort levels. Objectives The purpose of this systematic review was to explore the efficacy of the various abdominal nerve blocks employed in abdominoplasty surgery and to draw attention to any modality that may be superior in regards to effectiveness and/or administration. Methods Utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was performed to identify studies that have employed regional nerve blocks in abdominoplasty procedures. Opioid consumption, pain scores, time to ambulation, time in the recovery room, and time to first analgesia request were extracted when available. Results A total of 191 articles were reviewed, of which 8 met inclusion criteria. The nerve blocks represented included TAP, RS, pararectus + ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric, intercostal, and quadratus lumborum. All modalities were effective in reducing opioid consumption except quadratus lumborum. Conclusions TAP, RS, pararectus + ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric, and intercostal regional nerve blocks have been shown to optimize postoperative pain management in abdominoplasty procedures. The existing literature suggests that when studied against one another, TAP is more efficacious than RS and pararectus + ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric. When ultrasound guidance is unavailable, consideration should be given to TAP employing the direct visualization approach. Level of Evidence: 2

Trunk and Spine Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart A. Grant ◽  
David B Auyong
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Clinical Anatomy ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Quadratus Lumborum ◽  
Tools And Techniques

This chapter describes the clinical anatomy and outlines the tools and techniques needed to perform thoracic, abdominal and neuraxial ultrasound-guided procedures. The nerve blocks described here include the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), quadratus lumborum, ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric, rectus sheath, intercostal, PECS, serratus plane, paravertebral, and neuraxial spinal and epidural blocks. For each nerve block, the indications, risks, and benefits of the varying approaches are described in detail. The chapter includes step-by-step instructions with illustrations to allow the operator to perform clinically effective and safe ultrasound-guided thoracic, truncal, and neuraxial procedures. At the conclusion of each block description, a “Pearls” segment highlights important tips gleaned from our clinical experience. This chapter provides the practitioner with thorough instruction and knowledge allowing the optimal delivery of regional anesthesia for any thoracic or abdominal surgery.

scholarly journals Indications and outcomes of enterovesical and colovesical fistulas: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prevalence

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Granieri ◽  
Francesco Sessa ◽  
Alessandro Bonomi ◽  
Sissi Paleino ◽  
Federica Bruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Palliative Surgery ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Colovesical Fistula ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Entero-colovesical fistula is a rare complication of various benign and malignant diseases. The diagnosis is prominently based on clinical symptoms; imaging studies are necessary not only to confirm the presence of the fistula, but more importantly to demonstrate the extent and the nature of the fistula. There is still a lack of consensus regarding the if, when and how to repair the fistula. The aim of the study is to review the different surgical treatment options, focus on surgical indications, and explore cumulative recurrence, morbidity, and mortality rates of entero-vesical and colo-vesical fistula patients. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Random effects meta-analyses of proportions were developed to assess primary and secondary endpoints. I2 statistic and Cochran’s Q test were computed to assess inter-studies’ heterogeneity. Results Twenty-two studies were included in the analysis with a total of 861 patients. Meta-analyses of proportions pointed out 5, 22.2, and 4.9% rates for recurrence, complications, and mortality respectively. A single-stage procedure was performed in 75.5% of the cases, whereas a multi-stage operation in 15.5% of patients. Palliative surgery was performed in 6.2% of the cases. In 2.3% of the cases, the surgical procedure was not specified. Simple and advanced repair of the bladder was performed in 84.3% and 15.6% of the cases respectively. Conclusions Although burdened by a non-negligible rate of complications, surgical repair of entero-colovesical fistula leads to excellent results in terms of primary healing. Our review offers opportunities for significant further research in this field. Level of Evidence Level III according to ELIS (SR/MA with up to two negative criteria).

scholarly journals Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Lodde ◽  
M. J. Raschke ◽  
J. Stolberg-Stolberg ◽  
J. Everding ◽  
S. Rosslenbroich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Periprosthetic Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Distal Femoral Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Double Plating

Abstract Background The optimal treatment strategy for the surgical management of femur fractures and non-unions remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess union rates, complications and outcome after femoral double plating. Treatment of shaft, distal, periprosthetic fractures and pathological proximal femur fractures as well as femoral non-unions with double plating were evaluated. Methods A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was conducted. Published literature reporting on the treatment and clinical outcome of femoral fractures and non-unions with double plating was identified. In total, 24 studies with 436 cases of double plating, 64 cases of single plating, 84 cases of intramedullary nailing (IM), and 1 interfragmentary screw treatment met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The evaluated literature was published between 1991 and 2020. Results Double plating of femoral fractures achieved high healing rates and few complications were reported. It displayed significantly less intraoperative haemorrhage, shorter surgery time reduced risk of malunion in polytraumatised patients when compared to IM. Fracture healing rate of double-plating distal femoral fractures was 88.0%. However, there were no significant differences regarding fracture healing, complication or functional outcome when compared to single plating. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures with double plating displayed high healing rates (88.5%). Double plating of non-unions achieved excellent osseous union rates (98.5%). Conclusions The literature provides evidence for superior outcomes when using double plating in distal femoral fractures, periprosthetic fractures and femoral non-unions. Some evidence suggests that the use of double plating of femoral fractures in polytraumatised patients may be beneficial over other types of fracture fixation. Level of evidence IV.

Factors associated with neck pain in fighter aircrew: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. oemed-2020-107103
Author(s):  
James B Wallace ◽  
Phil M Newman ◽  
Aoife McGarvey ◽  
Peter G Osmotherly ◽  
Wayne Spratford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Computer Work ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Operational Capability ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Common Complaint ◽  
Meta Analyses

Neck pain is a common complaint among fighter aircrew, impacting workforce health and operational capability. This systematic review aimed to identify, evaluate and synthesise the current evidence for factors associated with the occurrence of neck pain among fighter aircrew. Six electronic databases were searched in June 2019 and updated in June 2020 utilising the maximum date ranges. Included studies were appraised for methodological quality, ranked according to level of evidence and relevant data extracted. Where methods were homogeneous and data availability allowed, meta-analyses were performed. A total of 20 studies (16 cross sectional, one case–control, one retrospective cohort and two prospective cohort) were eligible for inclusion. Of the 44 factors investigated, consistent evidence was reported for greater occurrence of neck pain among aircrew operating more advanced aircraft and those exposed to more desk/computer work, while another 12 factors reported consistent evidence for no association. Of the 20 factors where meta-analyses could be performed, greater occurrence of neck pain was indicated for aircrew: flying more advanced aircraft, undertaking warm-up stretching and not placing their head against the seat under greater +Gz. Despite many studies investigating factors associated with neck pain among fighter aircrew, methodological limitations limited the ability to identify those factors that are most important to future preventive programmes. High-quality prospective studies with consistent use of definitions are required before we can implement efficient and effective programmes to reduce the prevalence and impact of neck pain in fighter aircrew. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019128952.Neck pain is a common complaint among fighter aircrew, impacting workforce health and operational capability. This systematic review aimed to identify, evaluate and synthesise the current evidence for factors associated with the occurrence of neck pain among fighter aircrew.

Transversus Abdominis Plane and Rectus Sheath Blocks

2021 ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Natalea Johnson ◽  
Jorge A. Pineda
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Rectus Sheath Block ◽  
Intercostal Nerves

Chapter 9 discusses truncal peripheral nerve blocks, which are utilized for supplemental analgesia for abdominal surgeries by providing local anesthesia to the anterior abdominal wall. These blocks are adjuvants because they will not block visceral pain. Unilateral analgesia to the skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum of the abdominal wall is achieved. The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) reliably provides analgesia to the lower abdominal wall in the T10–L1 distribution. Rectus sheath blocks anesthetize the terminal branches of the lower thoracic intercostal nerves and provide midline analgesia from the xiphoid process to the umbilicus. Surgical indications for TAP blocks include laparotomies, laparoscopies, inguinal hernia repairs, and appendectomies. Rectus sheath block indications include midline surgeries such as single-port appendectomies and umbilical hernia repairs.

scholarly journals The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Li ◽  
Zhen-Zhen Xu ◽  
Xue-Ying Li ◽  
Ting-Ting Jiang ◽  
Zeng-Mao Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Renal Surgery

Abstract Background Ultrasound-guided lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can provide definite analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall. However, whether this method is useful in renal surgery through the lateral abdominal wall pathway remains unknown. The study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of lateral TAP block for retroperitoneoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy. Method In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible patients were randomized into two groups. After anaesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided lateral TAP block was performed with either 30 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine (Group T) or an equivalent volume of normal saline (Group C). The primary outcomes were opioid consumption during surgery and in the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postsurgical pain intensity immediately awakening from anaesthesia and at 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, as well as recovery variables including the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sleep quality, time to first ambulation, drainage and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 104 patients were enrolled and randomized (53 in Group T and 51 in Group C). Laparoscopic surgery was converted to open surgery in one patient of Group T; this patient was excluded from the outcome analysis. The opioid consumption during surgery (intravenous morphine equivalent dose: median 35.0 mg [interquartile range 18.0, 49.6] in Group C vs. 40.3 mg [20.9, 59.0] in Group T, P = 0.281) and in the first 24 h after surgery (10.8 mg [7.8, 21.7] in Group C vs. 13.2 mg [8.0, 26.6] in Group T, P = 0.311) did not differ significantly between groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the pain intensity at all time points after surgery and the recovery variables (all P > 0.05). Conclusions Our results showed that, in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery, preoperative lateral TAP did not decrease intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, nor did it relieve pain intensity or promote postoperative recovery in the first 24 h after surgery. However, the trial might be underpowered. Trial registration This study was registered on November 4, 2017, in the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry with the identification number ChiCTR-INR-17013244.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document