scholarly journals 1382 Retrospective Audit to Assess Compliance to National Guidance for The Follow-Up of Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis and Adenoma Detection Rate at University Hospital Bristol

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Newton ◽  
L Huppler ◽  
T McCabe ◽  
L Gourbault ◽  
Y Embury-Young ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Diverticulitis is a common cause for acute surgical admissions. UK guidance recommends uncomplicated diverticulitis is managed with antibiotics, and follow-up outpatient lower gastrointestinal (LGI) endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) arranged 6-8 weeks after discharge. This audit aimed to assess compliance to national guidance and assess adenoma detection rate. Method Retrospective analysis of discharge summaries coded ‘diverticulitis’ from January 2017 – April 2020 at University Hospital Bristol(UHB). Results 426 patients presented with uncomplicated diverticulitis, mean age 60.5 years (22-92 years). 42% (179/426) of patients underwent LGI endoscopy as an inpatient or on discharge. Median time to outpatient endoscopy was 70 days (6-287 days). 23% (99/426) had LGI endoscopy within the 8-week target. Histology showed: 21% (37/179) polyp; 5% (9/179) tubular adenoma; and one patient had high grade dysplasia. The histology for the remaining 28 patients with polyps showed: hyperplasia; granulation tissue; inflammation; or samples were not sent for histology. No cases of malignancy were detected. Conclusions 58% of patients admitted with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis did not have a follow-up LGI endoscopy and only 23% had LGI endoscopy within the 8-week target. 21% had a polyp with a 5% rate of tubular adenoma and no cases of malignancy. UHB needs to improve compliance with national guidance for the arrangement of follow-up LGI endoscopy, however the absence of detection of malignancy raises the question of whether we need to re-consider its necessity for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. E197-E202
Author(s):  
Sohaib Ouazzani ◽  
Arnaud Lemmers ◽  
Federico Martinez ◽  
Raphael Kindt ◽  
Olivier Le Moine ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Quality in colonoscopy has been promoted in last decade with definition of different quality indicators (QI) as benchmarks. Currently, automatized monitoring systems are lacking, especially for merging pathologic and endoscopic data, which limits quality monitoring implementation in daily practice. We describe an adapted endoscopy reporting system that allows continuous QI recording, with automatic pathological data inclusion. Material and methods We locally adapted a reporting system for colonoscopy by adding and structuring in a dedicated tab selected key QI. Endoscopic data from a reporting system and pathological results were extracted and merged in a separate database. During the initial period of use, performing physicians were encouraged to complete the dedicated tab on a voluntary basis. In a second stage, completing of the tab was made mandatory. The completeness of QI recording was evaluated across both periods. Performance measures for all endoscopists were compared to global results for the department and published targets. Results During the second semester of 2017, a total of 1827 colonoscopies were performed with a QI tab completed in 100 % of cases. Among key QI, the cecal intubation rate was 93.8 %, the rate of colonoscopies with adequate preparation was 90.7 %, and the adenoma detection rate was 29.8 % considering all colonoscopies, irrespective of indication; 28.8 % considering screening procedures; and 36.6 % in colonoscopies performed in people older than age 50 years. Conclusion This study shows that quality monitoring for colonoscopy can be easily implemented with limited human resources by adapting a reporting system and linking it to a pathology database.





Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid-Reza Moein ◽  
Eskara Pervez ◽  
Salina Faidhalla ◽  
Heba Habbal ◽  
Hajra Khan ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S136
Author(s):  
Rahul Sao ◽  
Bhoomika Bhatia ◽  
Eesha R Sachdeva ◽  
Angelie R Saini ◽  
Neeraj Sachdeva ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Nekhaykova ◽  
S Kashin ◽  
T Kryukova ◽  
A Belova ◽  
E Krainova


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Michopoulos ◽  
G Axiaris ◽  
P Baxevanis ◽  
M Stoupaki ◽  
V Gagari ◽  
...  




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document