scholarly journals O33 Outcomes of patients undergoing emergency surgery during the first phase of national lockdown in the United Kingdom due to COVID-19 pandemic: experience at a district general hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Luo ◽  
R Limb ◽  
A Aslam ◽  
R Kattimani ◽  
D Karthikappallil ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency operations during the first phase of lockdown in the United Kingdom, compared to the equivalent population in the same calendar period in 2019. Method We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgery in emergency theatres at our district general hospital between March 23rd and May 11th in 2019 and 2020. Data collected included demographics, National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) category and procedure. The primary outcome was 90-day post-operative mortality; secondary outcomes included time to intervention and length of inpatient stay. Result 132 patients (2020) versus 141 (2019) patients were included with no significant difference in age (P = 0.676), sex (P = 0.230), or overall 90-day postoperative mortality (P = 0.196). Notably, time to intervention was faster for NCEPOD code 3 patients in 2020 than 2019 (P = 0.027). Time to intervention in 2020 was longer for those dying within 90 days post-operatively compared to survivors (P = 0.02). There was no difference in length of stay between years, both overall and when comparing subgroups by NCEPOD category or procedures (fractured neck of femur (P = 0.776), laparoscopies (P = 0.866), laparotomies (P = 0.252)), except for upper limb trauma (P = 0.007). Conclusion This study is amongst the first describing the general case mix in emergency theatres in the UK. Patient pre-operative characteristics and demographics did not change. Our data confirms patient prioritisation according to NCEPOD recommendations and streamlining of surgical services, with no difference in overall mortality, time to intervention or length of stay compared to 2019. Take-home Message At this district general hospital, patients were appropriately prioritised, and our results show adaptation of hospital practice to emerging national guidelines during the first phase of lockdown. A national validation audit assessing morbidity and mortality outcomes for all NCEPOD patients may be facilitate further understanding of risks posed to patients requiring urgent surgery during these unprecedented times.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Luo ◽  
R Limb ◽  
A Aslam ◽  
R Kattimani ◽  
D Karthikappallil ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim This study aimed to investigate the patient population requiring emergency surgery during the first phase of lockdown due to COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and compare it to the equivalent population in the same calendar period for 2019. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on emergency operations. Method We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgery in emergency theatres at our district general hospital between March 23rd and May 11th in 2019 and 2020. Data collected included demographics (age/gender), National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) category and operation. The primary outcome was 90-day post-operative mortality; secondary outcomes included time to intervention and length of inpatient stay. Results 132 (2020) versus 141 (2019) patients were included with no significant difference in age (p = 0.676) nor sex (p = 0.230). There was no difference in overall 90-day postoperative mortality (p = 0.196). Notably, time to intervention was faster for NCEPOD code 3 patients in 2020 than in 2019 (p = 0.027). Time to intervention in 2020 was longer for those dying within 90 days post-operatively compared to survivors (p = 0.02). There was no difference in length of stay between the years, both overall and when conducting subgroup analyses by NCEPOD category or procedures (fractured neck of femur (p = 0.776), laparoscopies (p = 0.866), laparotomies (p = 0.252)), except for upper limb trauma (p = 0.007). Conclusions Patients were appropriately prioritised with no overall change in mortality or length of stay. A national validation audit assessing outcomes of emergency operations during these challenging times would further elucidate risks posed to surgical patients requiring urgent care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Sonia Ike ◽  
Chijioke Ikechi ◽  
Jaideep Rait ◽  
Ankur Shah

The Coronavirus pandemic has caused major change across the world and in the National Health Service. In order to cope and help limit contagion, numerous institutions recognised the need to adjust clinical practice quickly yet safely. In this paper, we aim to describe the changes implemented in a general surgery department at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. Across the surgical specialties, frameworks, protocols and guidelines have been established locally and nationally. The aerosol generating procedures involved in general surgery required us to alter our daily activities. Modifications to patient management were necessary to try and reduce viral spread. Staff wellbeing was heavily promoted in order to help maintain the frontline workforce. A holistic approach was required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document