A Rare Case of Drug-induced Vasculitis in Out-patient Department

Drug-induced vasculitis can be defined as inflammation of blood vessels triggered by a spectrum of drugs. It presents not only with a localized skin rash but also may involve the internal organ systems, including the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, lungs, central nervous system, and joints. Here, we report the case of a 60-year-old woman who developed purpuric pruritic rashes on bilateral lower limbs and buttocks after the ingestion of sulphasalazine. The patient took the prescribed regimen for 14 days while experiencing an adverse drug reaction. At the follow-up visit, the patient was admitted and treated with methylprednisolone monotherapy with 32 mg/day for the first 3 days and after that, methylprednisolone 16 mg for the next 3 days. The rashes resolved after 6 days. Clinicians should ascertain the patient knowledge of how and when to obtain urgent care as the patient may experience ill effects after taking prescribed treatment. Timely advice may save patients’ costs of admission and treatment to manage adverse events.

Barriers to implementation of pediatric emergency department interventions for parental tobacco use and dependence: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Background Pediatric emergency department (PED) and urgent care (UC) professionals can play a key role in delivering evidence-based guidelines to address parental tobacco use and child tobacco smoke exposure (TSE). Understanding PED/UC professionals’ perceptions regarding these guidelines is the first step in developing and implementing a TSE screening and counseling intervention in these settings. This study aimed to use the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to identify current screening and counseling behaviors of PED/UC professionals related to parental tobacco use and child TSE, and determine barriers and enablers that influence these behaviors. Methods Semi-structured, focused interviews were conducted with 29 actively practicing PED/UC clinical staff who worked at one large, Midwestern children’s hospital. The interview guide was informed by the TDF and included open-ended questions. Content analysis of interview transcripts was guided by the TDF. Nurses, physicians, and healthcare administrators were assessed overall and by group membership to ensure each group was represented based on their varying PED/UC roles. Results Fifty-one percent were nurses, 38% were physicians, and 11% were healthcare administrators. Most PED/UC professionals did not currently follow the guidelines, but perceived addressing parental tobacco use as part of their role. All 14 TDF domains were identified by nurses, physicians, and administrators in relation to counseling for parental tobacco use and child TSE. Domains with the most sub-themes were (1) knowledge: lack of knowledge about tobacco counseling, including implementing counseling, cessation resources/referrals, and thirdhand smoke; (2) beliefs about capabilities: not comfortable counseling parents, easier to discuss with parents who are receptive and to ask and advise when patients have a TSE-related complaint, and more likely to discuss if there were resources/referrals; and (3) environmental context and resources: barriers include lack of time, training, and resources and referral information to give to parents, and an enabler is using TSE-related complaints as a context to offer counseling. Conclusions Study findings provide a strong foundation for developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines regarding parental tobacco use and child TSE in the PED/UC setting. Future intervention development will address all TDF domains and test the implementation of the intervention in the PED/UC setting.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Secondary Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Acute Parkinsonism: A Case Report

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that has certain characteristic features but can also present with misleading signs and symptoms especially when it is of late-onset. Various case reports address its association with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), however, its association with parkinsonism remains unclear. We present the case of a 58-year-old male who reported with acute-onset parkinsonism along with some gastrointestinal symptoms. Detailed laboratory investigations unmasked the underlying SLE with an overlapping picture of TTP. This unusual presentation in a resource-constrained setting created challenges and subsequent delays in the diagnosis and management of the patient. Despite urgent care, the patient’s age, presence of overlapping conditions, and multi-organ involvement were some of the factors due to which the treatment failed and he could not survive. We report the association of SLE with secondary TTP and parkinsonism.

Practical Risk Scoring System for Predicting Severity of COVID-19 Disease

Objectives: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19 disease, has become an international pandemic with numerous casualties. It had been noted that the severity of the COVID-19 disease course depends on several clinical, laboratory, and radiological factors. This has led to risk scoring systems in various populations such as in China, but similar risk scoring systems based on the American veteran population are sparse, particularly with the vulnerable Veteran population. As a simple risk scoring system would be very useful, we propose a simple Jhala Risk Scoring System (JRSS) to assess the severity of disease risk. Methods: A retrospective review of all SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests collected and performed at the regional Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC) serving the Philadelphia and surrounding areas from March 17th, 2020 to May 20th, 2020. Data was collected and analyzed in the same year. These tests were reviewed within the computerized medical record system for demographic, medical history, laboratory test history, and clinical course. Information from the medical records were then scored based on the criteria of the Jhala Risk Scoring System (JRSS). Results: The JRSS, based on age, ethnicity, presence of any lung disease, presence of cardiovascular disease, smoking history, and diabetes history with laboratory parameters correlated and predicted (with statistical significance) which patients would be hospitalized. Conclusion: The JRSS may play a role in informing which COVID-19 positive patients in the emergency room/urgent care for risk stratification.

Introducing antimicrobial stewardship to the outpatient clinics of a suburban academic health system

Objective: To establish an antimicrobial stewardship program in the outpatient setting. Design: Prescribers of antimicrobials were asked to complete a survey regarding antimicrobial stewardship. We also monitored their compliance with appropriate prescribing practices, which were shared in monthly quality improvement reports. Setting: The study was performed at Loyola University Health System, an academic teaching healthcare system in a metropolitan suburban environment. Participants: Prescribers of antimicrobials across 19 primary care and 3 immediate- and urgent-care clinics. Methods: The voluntary survey was developed using SurveyMonkeyand was distributed via e-mail. Data were collected anonymously. Rates of compliance with appropriate prescribing practices were abstracted from electronic health records and assessed by 3 metrics: (1) avoidance of antibiotics in adult acute bronchitis and appropriate antibiotic treatment in (2) patients tested for pharyngitis and (3) children with upper respiratory tract infections. Results: Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing; verified compliance rates were highly concordant with self-reported rates. Nearly all prescribers were concerned about resistance, but fewer than half believed antibiotics were overprescribed in their office. Among respondents, 74% reported intense pressure from patients to prescribe antimicrobials inappropriately. Immediate- and urgent-care prescribers had higher rates of compliance than primary-care prescribers, and the latter group responded well to monthly reports and online educational resources. Conclusions: Intense pressure from patients to prescribe antimicrobials when they are not indicated leads to overprescribing, an effect compounded by the importance of patient satisfaction scores. Compliance reporting improved the number of appropriate antibiotics prescribed in the primary care setting.

Service use, clinical outcomes and user experience associated with urgent care services that use telephone-based digital triage: a systematic review

ObjectiveTo evaluate service use, clinical outcomes and user experience related to telephone-based digital triage in urgent care.DesignSystematic review and narrative synthesis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for literature published between 1 March 2000 and 1 April 2020.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies of any design investigating patterns of triage advice, wider service use, clinical outcomes and user experience relating to telephone based digital triage in urgent care.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers extracted data and conducted quality assessments using the mixed methods appraisal tool. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse findings.ResultsThirty-one studies were included, with the majority being UK based; most investigated nurse-led digital triage (n=26). Eight evaluated the impact on wider healthcare service use following digital triage implementation, typically reporting reduction or no change in service use. Six investigated patient level service use, showing mixed findings relating to patients’ adherence with triage advice. Evaluation of clinical outcomes was limited. Four studies reported on hospitalisation rates of digitally triaged patients and highlighted potential triage errors where patients appeared to have not been given sufficiently high urgency advice. Overall, service users reported high levels of satisfaction, in studies of both clinician and non-clinician led digital triage, but with some dissatisfaction over the relevance and number of triage questions.ConclusionsFurther research is needed into patient level service use, including patients’ adherence with triage advice and how this influences subsequent use of services. Further evaluation of clinical outcomes using larger datasets and comparison of different digital triage systems is needed to explore consistency and safety. The safety and effectiveness of non-clinician led digital triage also needs evaluation. Such evidence should contribute to improvement of digital triage tools and service delivery.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020178500.

Telemedicine for veterans in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from a virtual urgent care center

Introduction Although telemedicine was predominantly adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, its impact on healthcare outcomes in the veteran population in achieving first contact resolution, or the ability to safely manage patient care at home from an urgent care perspective, is yet to be determined. Methods This study included 13,090 veteran patient episodes who presented to the Department of Veteran's Affairs Veterans Integrated Services Network 8's Clinical Contact Center, a virtual urgent care organization covering South Georgia, Florida, and U.S. Virgin Islands in providing episodic care, between March 2020 and February 2021. Multivariate logistic regression estimated the probability that veterans with COVID-19-related symptoms stayed at home compared to presenting to the emergency department (ED) or their primary care provider. Results Patients with COVID-related symptoms were 33% less likely to present to the ED compared to patients who presented with non-COVID-related symptoms. Discussion The virtual urgent care center enabled veterans to receive timely care and avoid public places that could potentially lead to a COVID-19 infection or infecting others.

Long-haul COVID: Healthcare Utilization and Medical Expenditures 6 Months Post-diagnosis

Background Despite evidence that long-term COVID-19 symptoms may persist for up to a year, their implications for healthcare utilization and costs 6 months post-diagnosis remain unexplored. Methods Our objective is to determine for how many months post-diagnosis healthcare utilization and costs of COVID-19 patients persist above pre-diagnosis levels and explore response heterogeneity across age groups. This population-based retrospective cohort study followed COVID-19 patients’ healthcare utilization and costs from January 2019 through March 2021 using claims data provided by the COVID-19 Research Database. The patient population includes 328,777 individuals infected with COVID-19 during March-September 2020 and whose last recorded claim was not hospitalization with severe symptoms. We measure the monthly number and costs of total visits and by telemedicine, preventive, urgent care, emergency, immunization, cardiology, inpatient or surgical services and established patient or new patient visits. Results The mean (SD) total number of monthly visits and costs pre-diagnosis were .4805 (4.2035) and 130.67 (1,216.66) dollars compared with 1.1998 (8.5184) visits and 341.7576 (2,439.5581) dollars post-diagnosis. COVID-19 diagnosis associated with .7338 (95% CI, 0.7175 to 0.7500 visits; P < .001) more total healthcare visits and an additional $215.40 (95% CI, 210.76 to 220.00; P<.001) in monthly costs. Excess monthly utilization and costs for individuals under 19 years old subside after 5 months to .021 visits and $3.7, persist at substantial levels for all other groups and most pronounced among individuals 50-59 (.236 visits and $78.60) and 60-69 (.196 visits and $73.10) years old. Conclusions This study found that COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs 6 months post-diagnosis. These findings imply a prolonged burden to the US healthcare system from medical encounters of COVID-19 patients and increased spending.

The Healthcare Journey of Women With Advanced Gynecological Cancer From Diagnosis Through Terminal Illness: Qualitative Analysis of Progress Note Data

Objective To examine women’s journeys with gynecologic cancer from before diagnosis through death and identify elements of their healthcare experience that warrant improvement. Methods This exploratory study used longitudinal progress notes data from a multispecialty practice in Northern California. The sample included women with stage IV gynecological cancer diagnosed after 2011 and who died before 2018. Available progress notes from prior to diagnosis to death were qualitatively analyzed. Results We identified 32 women, (median age 61 years) with mostly uterine (n=17) and ovarian (n=9) cancers and median survival of 9.2 months (min:2.9 and max:47.5). Sixteen (50%) received outpatient palliative care and 18 (56%) received hospice care. The analysis found wide variation in documentation about communication about diagnosis, prognosis, goals of care, stopping treatment, and starting hospice care. Challenges included escalating/severe symptoms, repeated urgent care/emergency department/hospital encounters, and lack of or late access to palliative and hospice care. Notes also illustrated how patient background and goals influenced care trajectory and communication. Documentation styles varied substantially, with palliative care notes more consistently documenting conversations about goals of care and psychosocial needs. Conclusion This analysis of longitudinal illness experience of women with advanced gynecological cancer suggests that clinicians may want to (1) prioritize earlier discussion about goals of care; (2) provide supplemental support to patients with higher needs, possibly through palliative care or navigation; and (3) write notes to enhance patient understanding now that patients may access all notes.