EP.FRI.557 A systematic review on the use of prophylactic Proton Pump Inhibitors in patients with a hip fracture and their effect on developing acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage and mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Finian Doyle

Abstract Hip fractures represent a significant burden to every Orthopaedic department. Acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage (AGIH) /stress ulceration is a postoperative complication associated with increased mortality. Stress ulcer prophylaxis such as the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is an important measure to decrease this perioperative complication.   Aims This systematic review will aim to determine whether there is any benefit for patients with hip fractures being treated with prophylactic PPI medication to prevent AGIH and whether they reduce mortality.   Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were identified according to the selection criteria and analysed using statistical software. Results A total of 3 observational studies with 3413 participants met the criteria for inclusion. Patients taking PPIs had a reduced risk of an AGIH hip fracture than those without PPI therapy (RR 0.15 (95% CI 0.04–0.57, p < 0.0001).The use of PPIs in hip fracture patients shows a reduced mortality risk (RR 0.12 (95% CI 0.01–1.06, p < 0.0001). Conclusion These results suggest that prophylactic PPI use in hip fracture patients is associated with a reduced risk of AGIH and also a reduced rate of mortality in this patient group. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the risk of AGIH as a complication in hip fracture patients, knowledgeable to the factors which increase risk in their patient population and be cognisant that the prophylactic use of PPI medication is of benefit in reducing the complication of AGIH and correlates with a decreased mortality rate. 

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1999-2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salman Hussain ◽  
Ali Nasir Siddiqui ◽  
Anwar Habib ◽  
Md. Sarfaraj Hussain ◽  
Abul Kalam Najmi

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110590
Author(s):  
Na He ◽  
Yingying Yan ◽  
Shan Su ◽  
Qinggang Ge ◽  
Suodi Zhai

Background: Histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) have been largely replaced by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) despite the inconclusive evidence concerning comparative effectiveness. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of PPIs and H2RAs on SUP in real-world setting. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to September 19, 2021. We included cohort studies comparing PPIs with H2RAs in critically ill adult patients and explicitly reporting the outcome of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or mortality. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess potential risk of bias. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis and only the studies with adjusted effect estimates were pooled. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to assess the overall quality of the evidence. Results: Thirteen cohort studies (N = 145 149) were eligible and 11 of them available for full texts were of low to moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis of adjusted effect estimates indicated that PPIs were associated with a significantly higher risk of GI bleeding, compared with H2RAs (8 studies, odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-3.01, low certainty). Post hoc pooling analysis also suggested that PPIs were associated with a slightly higher risk of mortality in comparison with H2RAs (7 studies, OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.13-1.42, low certainty). Conclusion and Relevance: The systematic review of cohort studies showed that PPIs were associated with higher risks of GI bleeding and mortality, although the certainty of evidence was low. Overall, we suggest not excluding H2RAs for SUP, while further studies are essential for elucidating the risk stratification, optimal regimen, and specific duration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document