scholarly journals P062 IMPLEMENTATION OF ETEP (EXTENDED TOTALLY EXTRAPERITONEAL REPAIR) AS A NEW METHOD OF INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Nowakowski ◽  
Ayman Waly Elkalash ◽  
thomas lahaye
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
New Method ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal ◽  
Artery Embolism ◽  
Sublay Technique ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal Repair

Abstract Aim To assess the outcomes of implementation of extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) for incisional hernia in our clinic. Material and Methods In our clinic abdominal wall hernias are predominantly repaired in eMILOS (endoscopic Mini or Less Open Sublay)-technique. However, we hoped for advantages in repairing incisional hernias in eTEP-technique. From 19.09.2019 till 28.04.2021 there were 13 patients with incisional hernias included to be operated in eTEP-technique. Results Among 13 patients, mean age was 64,6 years (range 47 – 78 years), 7 females (54%) and 6 males (46%). Average diameter of the hernia was 6,46 cm (range 2 – 14 cm). The mean Body Mass Index of the patients was 29,41 kg/m² (range 18,4 – 48,76 kg/m²). The mean duration of the operation was 162,38 minutes (range 106 – 237 minutes). The mean surface of the mesh was 612 cm² (range 225 – 1200 cm²). Hospital stay lasted mean of 5,8 days (range 2 – 28 days). We observed one postoperative complication as a lung artery embolism occurred in one patient with preperitoneal heamatoma due to needed anticoagulation. Till today we have not observed any recurrence. Conclusions Our study shows that a new method of incisional hernia repair with mesh placement can be a safely implemented and may have advantages compering with other laparoscopic methods. It has low complication rate, shows good cosmetic results and is cost effective.

scholarly journals Initial Experience Of Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

1970 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
SK Biswas ◽  
MM Arefin ◽  
JC Saha ◽  
T Ahmed ◽  
MM Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Mesh Repair ◽  
The Mean ◽  
A Prospective Study

The laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a safe alternative to open mesh repair. The procedure has the advantages of minimal access surgery and lower recurrence rate. A prospective study of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair of our first 11 patients was performed from July 2008 to December 2009. No serious intraoperative or postoperative morbidity was encountered, only two patients developed seroma. The mean operating time was 90 minutes (60 to 180 minutes). The mean day of discharge after surgery was 3 days (2-7 days). No patient developed a recurrence during mean follow up period of 10 months. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia has been shown to be feasible, safe and effective. However, careful patient selection and acquiring the necessary advanced laparoscopic surgical skills coupled with the proper use of equipment are mandatory before embarking on this procedure.Key Words: Incisional hernia; Laparoscopic repair; Mesh; Polypropylene DOI: 10.3329/fmcj.v5i2.6819Faridpur Med. Coll. J. 2010;5(2):41-45

scholarly journals P053 COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN INTRAPERITONEAL ONLAY MESH REPAIR (IPOM PLUS) AND ENHANCED-VIEW TOTALLY EXTRAPERITONEAL REPAIR (ETEP) FOR VENTRAL HERNIAS

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Hirukawa
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal Repair ◽  
Hernia Size ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Aim We have been performing intraperitoneal on lay mesh repair (IPOM plus) as the standard laparoscopic procedure for ventral hernia in our department. We introduced enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP) for ventral hernia repair in 2018, and have performed 31 cases so far. We compared the outcomes of IPOM Plus and eTEP at our institution. Material and Methods Ventral hernia cases who underwent surgery at our department between 2018 and 2020 were included in the study. The postoperative outcomes and complications of the IPOM Plus and eTEP groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results There were 12 cases of IPOM plus, and all were incisional hernias. There were 31 cases of eTEP, including 7 cases of primary hernias and 24 cases of incisional hernias. Transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) was added in 24 cases. The mean hernia size was 6.6 x 7.9 cm with IPOM Plus and 8.0 x 10.1 cm with eTEP, and the average meshes size was 15.5 x 22.0 cm and 20.3 x 23.6 cm, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.8 days and 5 days. Postoperative complications included 1 case of mesh bulging and 1 case of recurrence in the IPOM Plus group, 1 case of seroma and 1 case of intestinal obstruction in the eTEP. Conclusions The surgical outcomes for ventral hernias up to 8 cm wide were similar for IPOM Plus and eTEP. The eTEP can insert a larger mesh and may be useful for wider hernias (>8cm).

scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: comparative non-randomized study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 2216
Author(s):  
Wael Barakaat Ahmed Mohamed ◽  
Magdy Khalil Abdelmgeed
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Repair Group

Background: One of the most common complications of laparotomy is Incisional hernia, with an estimated incidence of 3-20%. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of patients after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair.Methods: This was a prospective observational comparative study, in Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt. All adult patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria underwent laparoscopic or open incisional hernia repair from September 2013 to September 2016 were included in the study. Primary outcome measure of this study was recurrence rate, wound infection. And secondary outcome measure of this study was operative time, postoperative complications and hospital stay.Results: Between September 2013 and September 2016, 60 patients with incisional hernia had fulfilled our inclusion criteria were operated at the general surgery department at Sohag university hospitals, Sohag, Egypt. 31 patients had open incisional hernia repair and 29 had laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. The mean age for laparoscopic repair group was 45.69±7.66 years and for open repair group was46.94±8.08 years p value 0.543. In laparoscopic group male to female ratio 20/9 was while in open group it was16/15 p value 0.197.the mean body mass index for laparoscopic group was29.83±3.56kg/m2 and for open group30.00±3.32kg/m2 p value= 0.873. the most significant finding was hospital stay which was significantly shorter in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair group p value was 0.000 as well as wound infections were significantly lower in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair group p value was 0.05. there was no significant difference between both groups as regard operative time, bowel injury intraoperative complication postoperative complications as well as recurrence rate. The mean follows uptime was 27.24±3.04 months for laparoscopic incisional hernia group and 27.12±3.06 months for open group.Conclusions: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a safe alternative to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with a shorter hospital stay and a lower wound complication.

scholarly journals P018 COLLABORATIVE APPROACH FOR SIMULTANEOUS REPAIR OF COMPLEX INCISIONAL HERNIA AND STOMA REVERSAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carles Olona ◽  
Aleidis Caro ◽  
Raquel Casanova ◽  
Beatriz Espina ◽  
Jordi Vadillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Intestinal Transit ◽  
Simultaneous Treatment ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Aim The simultaneous repair of incisional hernias (IH) and the reconstruction of the intestinal transit may pose a challenge for many surgeons. Collaboration between units specialized in abdominal wall and colorectal surgery can favor simultaneous treatment. We present our experience in the collaboration between specialized units for the simultaneous treatment of complex incisional hernias and ostomy closure. Material and Methods Descriptive study of patients undergoing simultaneous surgery of complex IH repair and intestinal transit reconstruction in the period 2018.2021. All interventions were performed electively and with the collaboration of surgeons experts in abdominal wall and colorectal surgery. Demographic variables, hernias characteristics, surgical techniques, postoperative evolution, morbidity and mortality are recorded Results 16 patients are included. 8 with ileostomy, 3 lateral colostomies and 5 end colostomies . All the patients presented IH of the middle laparotomy and 12 had stomal hernias associated. The mean diameters of the IH were 16.2cm longitudinal and 11cm transverse. Intestinal transit was reconstructed in 15 cases (94%) and incisional hernia repair in 100%. Component separation was required in 75% of cases (8 posterior and 4 anterior). Morbidity in the first postoperative month was 18%, requiring 2 reoperations (12%). At the end of the mean follow-up of 10.8 months, 81% of the cases did not present complications. Conclusions The collaboration between specialist allows the use of advanced techniques in the simultaneous reconstruction of the abdominal wall and intestinal transit, with good clinical results and patient quality of life.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. van Veenendaal ◽  
M. M. Poelman ◽  
B. van den Heuvel ◽  
B. J. Dwars ◽  
W. H. Schreurs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Hernia Surgery ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Postoperative Symptoms

Abstract Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are pivotal to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management. Debate persists on the optimal surgical technique to repair incisional hernias. Assessment of PROs can guide the selection of the best management of patients with incisional hernias. The objective of this cohort study was to present the PROs after incisional hernia repair at long term follow-up. Methods Patients with a history of incisional hernia repair were seen at the out-patient clinic to collect PROs. Patients were asked about the preoperative indication for repair and postoperative symptoms, such as pain, feelings of discomfort, and bulging of the abdominal wall. Additionally, degree of satisfaction was asked and Carolina Comfort Scales were completed. Results Two hundred and ten patients after incisional hernia repair were included with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. The main indication for incisional hernia repair was the presence of a bulge (60%). Other main reasons for repair were pain (19%) or discomfort (5%). One hundred and thirty-two patients (63%) reported that the overall status of their abdominal wall had improved after the operation. Postoperative symptoms were reported by 133 patients (63%), such as feelings of discomfort, pain and bulging. Twenty percent of patients reported that the overall status of their abdominal wall was the same, and 17% reported a worse status, compared to before the operation. Ten percent of the patients would not opt for operation in hindsight. Conclusion This study showed that a majority of the patients after incisional hernia repair still report pain or symptoms such as feelings of discomfort, pain, and bulging of the abdominal wall 3 years after surgery. Embedding patients’ expectations and PROs in the preoperative counseling discussion is needed to improve decision-making in incisional hernia surgery.

Incisional Hernia Repair of Medium- and Large-Sized Defects: Laparoscopic IPOM Versus Open SUBLAY Technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-235
Author(s):  
Patrick Hamid Alizai ◽  
Eric Lelaona ◽  
Anne Andert ◽  
Ulf Peter Neumann ◽  
Christian Daniel Klink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Sublay Technique

scholarly journals Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ali ◽  
G. Sandblom ◽  
A. Wikner ◽  
G. Wallin
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair ◽  
Defect Closure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ventral And Incisional Hernia

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel IPOM procedure with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, and to compare the outcomes of this procedure with IPOM with- (IPOM-plus) and IPOM without (sIPOM) defect closure. Method A single-centre retrospective study comparing a novel IPOM technique with peritoneal bridging (IPOM-pb) with the two commonly used IPOM techniques, IPOM with defect closure (IPOM-plus) and without defect closure (sIPOM). The intraoperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM ventral hernia repair were reviewed. Preoperative data, recurrence, and postoperative seroma, surgical site infection, and pain, were compared. Results From January 2017 to June 2020, a total of 213 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with IPOM technique. The mean length and width of the ventral hernia was 4.4 ± 1.8 cm and 3.6 ± 1.4 cm, respectively, and the mean BMI was 30.1 ± 5.2 kg/m2. The mean operating time was 67 ± 28 min and was longer for IPOM-pb (71 ± 27 min), less for IPOM-plus (63 ± 28 min), and least for sIPOM (61 ± 26 min). The incidence of early postoperative seroma was least in IPOM-pb (1/98, 1%), and similar in the IPOM-plus (4/94, 4%) and sIPOM (1/21, 5%) group. Late postoperative seroma was found only in IPOM-plus (2, 2%). The incidence of early and late postoperative pain was relatively higher in sIPOM (3, 14%; 1, 5%, respectively) compared to IPOM-pb and IPOM-plus in the early (5, 5% and 6, 6%) and late (2, 2% and 1, 1%) postoperative period, respectively. Surgical site infection was higher in sIPOM group (3, 14%), compared to IPOM-pb (1, 1%), and IPOM-plus (3, 3%). Recurrence rates were similar in IPOM-pb group (3/98, 3%) and IPOM-plus (3/94, 3%), and none in sIPOM (0/21). Conclusion IPOM with peritoneal bridging is as feasible and safe as conventional IPOM with defect closure and simple non-defect closure. However, a large randomised controlled trial is required to confirm this finding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document