Social Work and the Third Way Tough Love as Social Policy' Bill Jordan with Charlie Jordan, Sage Publications London. 2000. ISBN: 0-7619-6721-4

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-656
Author(s):  
C. Moore
2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 071119202633002-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Lund
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID STOESZ

The triumph of George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election is further evidence of the waning viability of the American welfare state. Since 1980 various strains of conservatism have vied for control of domestic policy through the Republican party, the most recent variant being ‘compassionate conservatism’. Democrats have responded by disavowing their liberal heritage and moving toward the centre. This reflects the replacement of a ‘social model’ with an ‘economic model’ for social policy. The Left can be rejuvenated by adopting three themes for domestic policy: mobility, empowerment and restructuring. These are consistent with the ‘third way’ in social policy, as centrists have advocated in the United States and the United Kingdom.


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-198
Author(s):  
Amir Paz-Fuchs

Somewhere between welfare to work policy and the jurisprudential analysis of rights and duties lies the third way motto of ‘no rights without responsibilities’. This paper shows how this proclamation offers no less than a new construction of one’s rights insofar as theydependon the obligations that he or she owes society. Investigating this new formulation through the established perspectives of the Interest (or Benefit) Theory and the Choice (or Will) theory sheds light on the jurisprudential background of this move, and its possible consequences. The paper then moves to describe the concrete impact that this theoretical reconstruction has on provisions embedded in welfare to work programs, and suggests that this may serve a pilot for a more comprehensive, and thus problematic, social policy. In the final section of the paper, the doctrine of ’unconstitutional conditions’ is revisited and improved in a way that, if accepted, may bar governments from diluting rights of disadvantaged groups and endangering them into becoming ‘illusory’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document