scholarly journals Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author(s):  
Miquel Pujol ◽  
José-María Miró ◽  
Evelyn Shaw ◽  
Jose-María Aguado ◽  
Rafael San-Juan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis. Methods A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy. Results Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93–1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018). Conclusions Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01898338.

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Fabre ◽  
Marcela Ferrada ◽  
Whitney R. Buckel ◽  
Edina Avdic ◽  
Sara E. Cosgrove

Abstract No clinical trials have investigated the use of ceftaroline fosamil for salvage therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. We report data on 29 patients who received ceftaroline ± another antimicrobial for this indication. Ninety percent of patients had microbiologic cure and 31% had treatment success with a median follow-up of 6 months.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca B. Regen ◽  
Sarah S. Schuman ◽  
Rebecca F. Chhim ◽  
Sandra R. Arnold ◽  
Kelley R. Lee

OBJECTIVES Limited data exist regarding clinical outcomes of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in children treated with vancomycin. Treatment success in adults correlates best with an area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24/MIC) ratio ≥400. It is unknown if this relationship is useful in children. METHODS Charts of children who received vancomycin ≥5 days for MRSA bacteremia with a steady state trough were reviewed. AUC24/MIC ratios were estimated using 2 different vancomycin clearance equations. Vancomycin treatment failure was defined as persistent bacteremia ≥7 days, recurrent bacteremia within 30 days, or 30-day mortality. RESULTS There were 67 bacteremia episodes in 65 patients. Nine (13.4%) met failure criteria: persistent bacteremia (n = 6), recurrent bacteremia (n = 2), 30-day mortality (n = 1). There were no differences between patients receiving <60 mg/kg/day and ≥60 mg/kg/day of vancomycin in median trough (11.9 versus 12.3 mg/L, p = 0.1). Troughs did not correlate well with AUC24/MIC ratios (R2 = 0.32 and 0.22). Patients receiving ≥60 mg/kg/day had greater probability of achieving ratios ≥400. There were no significant differences in median dose (p = 0.8), trough (p = 0.24), or AUC24/MIC ratios (p = 0.07 and p = 0.6) between patients with treatment success and failure. CONCLUSIONS Treatment failure was lower than previously reported in children. AUC24/MIC ratios ≥400 were frequently achieved but were not associated with treatment success, dose, or troughs. Prospective studies using standard definitions of vancomycin treatment failure are needed to understand treatment failure in children with MRSA bacteremia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S760-S760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miquel Pujol ◽  
Jose-Maria Miro ◽  
Evelyn Shaw ◽  
Jose Maria Aguado ◽  
Rafael San-Juan Garrido ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Daptomycin plus fosfomycin combination has demonstrated synergistic and bactericidal effect in animal models of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB), but there is lack of data in humans. Method A randomized (1:1), open-label, clinical trial involving adults with MRSAB was conducted at 18 medical centers in Spain. Patients were assigned to receive daptomycin, 10 mg/kg IV daily plus fosfomycin, 2 g IV/6 hour (combination therapy) or to receive daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h IV (monotherapy) during 10 up to 14 days for uncomplicated bacteremia and 28 up to 42 days for complicated bacteremia. The primary efficacy endpoints were: (a) treatment success at Test-of-Cure visit (ToC: 6 weeks after end of therapy) and (b) treatment success at 7 days (defined as alive at day 7 and clearance of bacteremia without relapse from 8 to 90 days after randomization), according with the proposed primary endpoints for use in clinical trials in bloodstream infections in adults. Result Between December 2013 and November 2017, 674 patients with MRSAB were evaluated and 155 patients were randomized: 74 received combination therapy and 81 monotherapy. In intention-to-treat analysis, (a) at ToC visit successful outcome was achieved in 40 of 74 patients (54,1%) who received combination therapy as compared with 34 of 81 patients (42%) who were given monotherapy (54.1% vs. 42.0%; absolute difference, 12.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-27.0%); (b) at 7 days after starting the therapy: a successful outcome was achieved in 69 of 74 patients who received combination therapy as compared with 62 out of 81 patients who received monotherapy (93.2% vs. 76.5%; absolute difference, 16.7%; 95% confidence interval, 5.4%–27.7%). Combination therapy was associated with lower rates of microbiologic failure than monotherapy at ToC visit (0 vs. 9 patients, P = 0.009). Combination therapy, as compared with daptomycin monotherapy, was associated with a nonsignificantly higher rate of adverse events due to study medication leading to treatment failure and discontinuation of therapy: 6/74 (8.1%) vs. 3/81 (3.7%) (P = 0.31). Conclusion The combination of daptomycin plus fosfomycin was more effective than daptomycin alone for treating MRSAB (NCT01898338). Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document