scholarly journals Informed Consent in Clinical Trials of in Vitro Diagnostic Devices: Perspectives from the FDA and Manufacturers

2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1753-1757
Author(s):  
Marva M Moxey-Mims ◽  
Marian J Serge ◽  
Marsha N Melvin
2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Tait Lathrop ◽  
Douglas A Jeffery ◽  
Yvonne R Shea ◽  
Peter F Scholl ◽  
Maria M Chan

Abstract Mass spectrometry–based in vitro diagnostic devices that measure proteins and peptides are underutilized in clinical practice, and none has been cleared or approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for marketing or for use in clinical trials. One way to increase their utilization is through enhanced interactions between the FDA and the clinical mass spectrometry community to improve the validation and regulatory review of these devices. As a reference point from which to develop these interactions, this article surveys the FDA's regulation of mass spectrometry–based devices, explains how the FDA uses guidance documents and standards in the review process, and describes the FDA's previous outreach to stakeholders. Here we also discuss how further communication and collaboration with the clinical mass spectrometry communities can identify opportunities for the FDA to provide help in the development of mass spectrometry–based devices and enhance their entry into the clinic.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11001-11001
Author(s):  
N. S. Markovic ◽  
O. Markovic ◽  
E. S. Henderson

11001 Background: At ASCO 2001, the Cervical Acid Phosphatase - Papanicolaou Test (CPT) was introduced as a biomarker-based technology as a potential in vitro diagnostic device. At ASCO 2004 and 2005, we reported results from clinical trials on 2,000 subject/specimens. In a setting of standard cervical cancer screening, the safety and effectiveness of CPT (MarkPap® Test) was compared with control Pap smear and LBP. The favorable results motivated us to expand this translational research in areas where this biomarker is crucial: self-sampling and digital evaluation. We report a pilot study designed to assess whether upgrading CPT with digital image processing (IT technology) could create a new device for an effective telecytopathology. Methods: Material: Cervical specimens self-obtained by volunteers, specimens collected in prior clinical trials (Library of MarkPap slides), and control slides. Instruments and methods: We have assembled a set of instruments and procedures to create images from microscopic slides, to convert analog into digital images, to capture and store digital images and clinical data in computer files, to transfer image files via Internet to a central server for evaluation by cytotechnologist/pathologists, and to return the reports within hours. At the end, the results of reading digital and direct images were available for comparison. Results: Since each instrument was “fit-for-use”, we have tested different “conditions-for-use” for providing digital images comparable to direct images. Images of self-sampled specimens, controls and existing slides were processed through a new setup of five modules: image acquisition, image and data transferring, image evaluation, results reporting and quality control. It was made possible by upgrading software. There was no difference between results obtained after evaluation of digital or direct images. Conclusion: Using CPT and available instruments and software, we have developed a prototype in vitro diagnostic medical device, which could permit expert evaluation of cervical specimens to be performed rapidly and at affordable cost for developing countries. This device should be able to use self-obtained specimens, field laboratory personnel and equipment, but to provide high-qualified evaluation within hours for an easy affordable cost. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document