Rheumatologic disorders in patients undergoing esophageal manometry: prevalence, symptom characteristics, and manometric findings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anam Qureshi ◽  
Asad Jehangir ◽  
Zubair Malik ◽  
Henry P Parkman
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Esophageal Motility ◽  
Esophageal Manometry ◽  
Upper Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Motility Disorders ◽  
Ineffective Esophageal Motility ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Esophageal Contractility

Summary Rheumatologic disorders (RDs) can have gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients often have upper GI symptoms from absent esophageal contractility (AC). Upper GI symptom characteristics and high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HREMI) findings of other RDs have not been well studied. We aimed to: (i) determine the prevalence of RD in patients undergoing HREMI and (ii) assess the symptom characteristics and manometric findings of these patients. Patients undergoing HREMI (July 2018 to March 2020) rated their GI symptoms’ severity. Healthy volunteers (HVs) also underwent HREMI. Of the 1,003 patients, 90 (9%) had RD (mean age: 55.3 ± 1.4 years, 73.3% females), most commonly SSc (n = 27), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n = 20), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n = 11). The most severe upper GI symptoms in patients with RD were heartburn, regurgitation, nausea, and dysphagia, with no significant differences in their severities between SSc, RA, and SLE. RD patients had higher upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures, lower distal contractile integral (DCI), lower bolus clearance, and more frequent hiatal hernia (HH) on HREMI (all P < 0.05) than HVs. Over half (61.1%) of patients with RD had esophageal motility disorders, most commonly AC (n = 25), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM; n = 18), and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstructive disorders (n = 11). Among patients undergoing HREMI, 9% had RD. Upper GI symptom severities did not distinguish different RDs. Patients with RD had higher UES pressures, weaker DCI, lower bolus clearance, and more frequent HH than HVs. Although AC and IEM were most common motility disorders, a considerable minority (12.2%) of our RD patients had EGJ obstructive disorders.

scholarly journals Esophageal motility abnormalities in Egyptian patients using high resolution esophageal manometry: a descriptive study

2022 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Gamal Naguib ◽  
Mohamed Hassan ◽  
Ahmed I. Elshafie ◽  
M. G. Naguib
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Esophageal Motility ◽  
Esophageal Manometry ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Dominant Type ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Prominent Symptom ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Egyptian Patients

Abstract Background and aim For many years, esophageal manometry has been used for assessment of upper gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms. Chicago classification is the key for diagnosis and managing motility disorders as it is considered as a standardized approach for categorization of esophageal abnormalities. The aim of this study is to analyze types of esophageal motility findings in Egyptian cases who were suffering from upper GI complaints. Methods: This descriptive study included 378 subjects who were suffering from upper GI complaints as dysphagia, vomiting, chest pain and regurgitation in the period between 10/2015–7/2020. Esophageal HRM study was performed for all patients (MMS Laborie device). The catheter was positioned and confirmed passing across the EGJ (esophago-gastric junction) using landmarks. Swallows and resting status were recorded. Anatomical landmarks were placed. Results Most of the patients were complaining of upper GI symptoms. Males were 49.2% of cases. Mean age was 41.3. Dysphagia was the prominent symptom while chest pain was the least symptom. Many manometry findings were observed including ineffective motility, achalasia, absent contractility, EGJ outflow obstruction, jackhammer esophagus and normal findings. Type II achalasia was the dominant type in achalasia patients while Type III was the least. LES was normotensive in most of the cases. Hiatus hernia (HH) was detected in 40.2% of the cases. Conclusion This is considered the first Egyptian descriptive study to determine the prevalence of esophageal motility abnormalities in Egyptian patients complaining of upper GI symptoms. HRM is very important for patients complaining of upper GI symptoms.

Esophageal manometry in the opossum.

1977 ◽  
Vol 233 (3) ◽  
pp. E152
Author(s):  
K Schulze ◽  
W J Dodds ◽  
J Christensen ◽  
J D Wood
Keyword(s):  
Animal Model ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Esophageal Manometry ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Upper Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Coronal Section ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Human Esophagus

The opossum esophagus is commonly used as an animal model of the human esophagus. We used esophageal manometry in normal animals to provide basal data about normal esophageal motor functions in vivo in this species. At rest, separate and distinct high pressure zones can be recorded at the level of the lower esophageal sphincter, diaphragmatic hiatus, aortic arch, and upper esophageal sphincter. Each zone demonstrates a characteristic pattern of pressures in the radii of the coronal section and a characteristic response to swallowing. The hiatal and aortic zones can be mistaken for the esophageal sphincters. Pressures in the sphincters fall with swallowing. Peristalsis is not bolus-dependent and occurs with 98% of swallows. Pressures generated by peristalsis are greater in the middle of the esophagus than at the ends. Values for resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure and the characteristics of peristalsis were reproducible between different studies in the same animals.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Pharyngeal and Esophageal Manometry in Healthy or Dysphagic Older Persons (>60 years)

Geriatrics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Cock ◽  
Taher Omari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Esophageal Manometry ◽  
Flow Resistance ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Upper Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Noncardiac Chest Pain ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Show Evidence ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter

We undertook a systematic review of swallowing biomechanics, as assessed using pharyngeal and esophageal manometry in healthy or dysphagic older individuals aged over 60 years of age, comparing findings to studies of younger participants. PRISMA-P methodology was used to identify, select, and evaluate eligible studies. Across studies, older participants had lower upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressures and evidence of decreased UES relaxation when compared to younger groups. Intrabolus pressures (IBP) above the UES were increased, demonstrating flow resistance at the UES. Pharyngeal contractility was increased and prolonged in some studies, which may be considered as an attempt to compensate for UES flow resistance. Esophageal studies show evidence of reduced contractile amplitudes in the distal esophagus, and an increased frequency of failed peristaltic events, in concert with reduced lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, in the oldest subjects. Major motility disorders occurred in similar proportions in older and young patients in most clinical studies, but some studies show increases in achalasia or spastic motility in older dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain patients. Overall, study qualities were moderate with a low likelihood of bias. There were few clinical studies specifically focused on swallowing outcomes in older patient groups and more such studies are needed.

Effect of prostaglandin E2 on esophageal motility in man

1975 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mukhopadhyay ◽  
S. Rattan ◽  
R. K. Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Prostaglandin E2 ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Esophageal Motility ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Upper Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
The Body ◽  
Inhibitory Influence ◽  
Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Peristaltic Contractions

Studies were performed to investigate the effect of prostaglandin E2 on esophageal motility in 12 healthy volunteers. PGE2 infusion caused a dose-dependent reduction in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. The threshold dose was less than 0.05 mug-kg-1-min-1 and maximal reduction of pressure (60%) occurred with a dose of 0.4 mug-kg-1-min-1. In contrast to its effect on the lower esophageal sphincter, PGE2 did not alter the pressure in the upper esophageal sphincter. PGE2 did not influence resting esophageal pressures; the amplitude of peristaltic contractions was reduced in the lower but not in the upper part of the body of the esophagus. These studies show that in man PGE2 exerts selective inhibitory influence on the activity of the lower part of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter which are composed of smooth muscle fibers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document