DOZ047.64: Sham feeding promotes oral feeding success in long-gap esophageal atresia, even with traction sutures in situ

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A D Hawley ◽  
R K Armstrong ◽  
J-A E Brooks ◽  
A Pellicano ◽  
M G Nightingale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Sham Feeding ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Definitive Repair ◽  
Traction Suture ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Suture Placement ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction Sham feeding (SF) and staged repair using traction suture techniques (TST) were both introduced to the management of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGOA) at The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne (RCH) in January 2012. Previous studies report SF to reduce time to full oral feeding (FOF) postdefinitive repair. In our practice, SF is individually tailored, supervised, and involves offering 2–4 feeds daily. This single-center experience describes SF in newborns with LGOA, including those with staged TST prior to definitive repair, and the impact of SF on time to FOF. Methods Patients admitted 2000–2018 with LGOA were identified from the Nate Myers Oesophageal Atresia Database, RCH. Those with incomplete data or complications preventing oral feeds were excluded. Patients were grouped into two epochs: Group 1 (2000–2011, no SF, no TST) and Group 2 (2012–2018, all offered SF, some TST). Demographics and time to FOF were compared between groups. Parametric data (mean, SD) were analyzed with two sample t-test, and nonparametric data (median, IQR) with Mann–Whitney test; P < 0.05 significant. Ethics approval was obtained (HREC#QA/51247/RCHM-2019). Results Of 37 LGOA patients, six met exclusion criteria leaving 31 for analysis; Group 1, n = 13; Group 2, n = 18. Groups did not differ in gestation (P = 0.63), birth weight (P = 0.91) or time to definitive repair (P = 0.85). In Group 2, 12/18 had successful SF, including 9 who underwent TST. Three additional patients with TST were unsuccessful with SF. Compared with Group 1, FOF was significantly reduced in those 12 patients with successful SF (median FOF 730 days, IQR 125–1100 vs. median FOF 75 days IQR 56–227; P = 0.03). Small sample size precluded meaningful subgroup analyses of successful versus unsuccessful SF patients. Importantly, no patient aspirated during SF, though one developed oral aversion post-TST and one ceased SF at parental request. Conclusions In LGOA, successful SF improves time to FOF postdefinitive repair, and was not associated with aspiration in our experience. Further, we report success with SF in patients undergoing staged repair with TST, including following traction suture placement. To our knowledge, this is the first report of SF in LGOA patients during the period between traction suture placement and definitive repair.

P-21: Feasibility and Safety of Sham Feeding in Long Gap Esophageal Atresia

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-294
Author(s):  
C. Lemoine ◽  
C. Faure ◽  
A. Villeneuve ◽  
K. Barrington ◽  
C. Desrosiers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Sham Feeding ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia

scholarly journals What is the Best Choice for Esophageal Replacement in Children?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ashjaei Bahar ◽  
Ashjaei Bahar ◽  
Movahedi Jadid Merisa ◽  
Parvizi Azita ◽  
Talebi Ali
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Esophageal Stricture ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Esophageal Replacement ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia

Esophageal replacement surgery is performed in children with either congenital long gap esophageal atresia or acquired esophageal damages such as caustic injury of the esophagus. although the left colon because of less variation in blood supply and suitable diameter in comparison with right colon is the better choice. A secured pedicled colon is mandatory for reducing the sever complications, such as leak and necrosis. Ileocolic conduit is an alternative method of colon interposition which has anti reflux effect and therefore with less complications related to gastroesophageal reflux. When we have a short segment esophageal stricture due to corrosive esophagitis or other causes of esophageal strictures which is refractory to repeated dilatations, it is advisable to perform colon patch esophagoplasty. Gastric transposition can produce a good way for gastrointestinal continuity with a perfect weight gain and oral feeding, therefor it can be a safe choice for esophageal replacement in children. Partial gastric pull-up is an alternative operation for esophageal replacement in children and infants with long gap esophageal atresia. Gastric conduit replacement is another alternative technique for esophageal replacement, in which a gastric tube is created in the abdomen and it is pulled to via thoracic cavity to the neck and is committed by cervical anastomosis. Antral patch esophagoplasty is used for benign and limited esophageal stricture due to gastroesophageal reflux. Usefulness of pedicled jejunum was under optimal results because of technical problems and high rate of necrosis and mortality for decades. Sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous esophagoplasty is a scarce method which is reported by some surgeons for limited cervical esophageal stricture repair. Free microvascular transfer of the reverse ileo-colon flap with ileocaecal valve valvuloplasty is used for reconstruction of a pharyngoesophageal defect, and Patch esophagoplasty by using of degradable bioscaffolds of extracellular matrix have shown good results in preclinical and clinical outcomes to prevent stenosis after endoscopic mucosectomy. We will explain the advantages and disadvantages of these different surgical methods in this review article.

DOZ047.93: Thoracoscopic multistage repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction suture technique—evolution of the method

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Patkowski ◽  
S Gerus ◽  
M Rasiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Traction Force ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Thoracoscopic Approach ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Thoracoscopic Repair ◽  
Esophageal Anastomosis ◽  
Traction Suture ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Two Stages

Abstract Treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia poses a great challenge for a surgeon. A new multistage thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction technique was developed that evolved with time and growing experience. The goal of this study is to present the changes in the strategy and important technical aspects of the operative method based on a retrospective analysis of performed surgeries. Methods and Materials Thirty-five cases of newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia (type A-26 cases and B-9 cases exclusively) were operated thoracoscopically between 2008 and 2019 using internal traction technique in different pediatric surgery centers (Poland–28, Czech–1, Ukraine–1, Switzerland–2, Egypt–2, Russia–1). The idea of the internal traction technique was to place the suture between thoracoscopically mobilized esophageal pouches and keep a static tension between them for a period of time. Patients were operated on as early as it was possible after birth. Results Of the 35 newborns operated on using internal traction 2 patients died before the final stage from not surgically-related causes. Two patients had complications that required neck fistula and had later Collis–Nissen and colon interposition, respectively. One case is awaiting the final procedure. For 31 cases the final esophageal anastomosis was completed in two stages–16 cases, three stages–9, four stages–2, five stages–2, and six stages–1. At the beginning the time between stages was planned for 4 weeks (for some cases it was even longer) and it was shortened for the last three cases to 5 days. It allowed avoiding gastrostomy in two cases. The internal traction was modified from using two traction loops to one traction loop with two slipping knots on each branch of the loop. The clips were applied transversely through the tip of each pouch and part of the traction loop to prevent disruption and pouch perforation. It also allowed increasing of the created static traction force. Conclusion Results of the study may indicate that in a majority of long-gap esophageal atresia it is possible to preserve the native esophagus by a thoracoscopic approach using an internal traction suture technique. Shortened time between stages allowed completion of the final esophageal anastomosis with gastrostomy avoidance.

DOZ047.74: Long-term outcome of preserving the native esophagus in long-gap esophageal atresia by thoracoscopic traction technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S H A J Tytgat ◽  
E S van Tuyll van Serooskerken ◽  
D C van der Zee ◽  
J W Verweij ◽  
M Y A Lindeboom
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Anastomotic Strictures ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia

Abstract Background Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is defined as atresia without distal tracheoesophageal fistula. Preserving the native esophagus is considered superior over intestinal interposition. Thoracoscopic traction technique facilitates lengthening of the esophageal ends, and allows anastomosis within the first weeks of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of LGEA patients treated by thoracoscopic traction technique. Methods From 2007 to 2018, 13 consecutive patients with LGEA were treated by thoracoscopic traction technique. During the first operation a bronchoscopy was performed to evaluate the presence of a proximal fistula. Then thoracoscopic traction sutures were placed at both esophageal ends. Initially a gastrostomy was performed. However, nowadays only a gastropexy is performed to prevent the stomach from migrating into the thorax. Approximation of the esophageal ends was evaluated by postoperative X-rays. Thoracoscopic adhesiolysis was performed when necessary. Both ends were anastomosed during the final surgical procedure, usually within a week. Results In 11 patients the anastomosis could be completed by thoracoscopic traction technique. In two patients the elongation procedure failed. In the first patient the sutures tore out. The second patient had an accidental perforation of the proximal pouch by the Replogle tube. Median time on ventilation until after the final anastomosis was 14 days (range 4–34 days). Five patients required chest tube drainage for anastomotic leakage. The median hospitalization time during the first admission was 47 days (range 31–170 days). All patients needed a median of 4 (range 1–16) dilatations for anastomotic stenosis. Ten patients needed a fundoplication within a median time of 8 weeks (range 2–16 weeks) after the esophageal anastomosis. One patient developed an esophago-bronchial fistula. Median weight at age of 2 years was −1.88 SD (range −3.54 – −0.16) and at age of 4 years −1.53 SD (range −2.94–0.66). All patients tolerated full oral feeding. Conclusion LGEA can be treated successfully after elongation by thoracoscopic traction technique. The procedure leads to an earlier anastomosis and shorter initial hospital stay as compared to delayed primary anastomosis. Full oral feeding is possible in all patients. Dilatation for anastomotic strictures and antireflux surgery is necessary in (almost) all patients.

DOZ047.124: Thoracoscopic anatomy of long-gap esophageal atresia. What can we predict?

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Rasiewicz ◽  
K Świątek ◽  
S Gerus ◽  
D Patkowski
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Distal Stump ◽  
Thoracic Vertebrae ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Thoracoscopic Repair ◽  
Proximal Stump ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Vertebral Bodies ◽  
Traction Group

Abstract Since the very beginning in 1999, thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become a gold standard in many pediatric surgery centers worldwide. Despite the advances in surgical technique, treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia still remains a challenge. The aim of this study is to assess whether the localization of esophageal stumps can predict number of stages needed to perform anastomosis. We analyzed video records of 21 patients who underwent staged thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction technique. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. We divided patients into two groups: first requiring single internal traction procedure, second who underwent multiple procedures. We assessed esophageal stump position in relation to thoracic vertebrae. The distance between stumps was measured in vertebral bodies. Mean distance between esophageal ends was 5.8 in single traction group. The distance between the stumps was significantly greater in multiple procedures group: 7.33 (P = 0.003). Patients who required multiple procedures had significantly lower localization of distal stump. Localization of proximal stump did not affect the possibility for anastomosis after single traction. Distance between both ends after internal traction was also significantly longer in multiple procedures group. Patients with lower localization of distal esophageal stump assessed during primary thoracoscopy are at higher risk for requiring multiple surgical procedures.

DOZ047.36: Thoracoscopic esophageal internal axial traction for long- gap esophageal atresia

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Juricic ◽  
N Panait ◽  
G Podevin ◽  
A Bonnard ◽  
P Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Long Gap ◽  
Esophageal Anastomosis ◽  
Long Gap Esophageal Atresia ◽  
Axial Traction ◽  
Median Operative Time

Abstract Aim of the Study Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) remains a surgical challenge. This study aimed to report the results of thoracoscopic esophageal axial internal traction in LGEA. Methods This multicenter observational study included retrospectively neonates who underwent primary thoracoscopic esophageal axial internal traction for LGEA between June 2017 and July 2018. LGEA was defined as the technical impossibility to perform a primary esophageal anastomosis. The Ethical Review Board of our institution approved the study. Main Results Eight neonates were included with a median gestational age at birth of 35 weeks [25; 37] and a median birth weight of 2266 g [890; 3800], 6 types I and 2 types II according to Ladd's classification. Initial median gap between 2 esophageal ends was 5 vertebral bodies [4.5; 7]. Internal traction was performed at a median age of 5 weeks of life [1; 17] with a median operative time of 87 minutes. Four patients required at least 2 internal traction procedures. After a mean traction time of 1.5 weeks [1; 13.5], esophageal anastomosis was successfully performed in 7 patients (5 thoracoscopies, 2 thoracotomies) with a median operative time of 165 minutes. One patient needed a colonic interposition. Five of these 7 patients required an esophageal endoscopic dilatation (median number: 4 [2; 6]). Median follow-up was 9.75 months [3; 16]. Conclusions Thoracoscopic esophageal axial internal traction for LGEA was a safe and feasible procedure that allowed an esophageal anastomosis in 7 of the 8 patients. Improvement of the procedure requires setting a common protocol concerning the timing of the first internal axial traction and the duration of traction before considering esophageal anastomosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document