scholarly journals P663 Efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis after previous ineffective biological therapies

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
M Rutka ◽  
K Farkas ◽  
D Pigniczki ◽  
K Szántó ◽  
B Anita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Tofacitinib (TFC) is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, which was recently approved for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of the current real-life study was to determine efficacy of TFC induction therapy regarding the clinical response and remission in patients with active UC. We evaluated short-term efficacy data in a Hungarian cohort with prior exposure to other biological agents such as anti-TNF drugs and vedolizumab. Methods In this single-centre retrospective study, patients with TFC introduction were included. Since January 2019, a total of 16 patients received an oral TFC induction therapy in a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Endoscopic activity was evaluated by endoscopic Mayo (eMayo) score before the introduction of TFC and in case of an inadequate therapeutic response to the 5-mg-therapy to confirm therapeutic decision-making. Based on the evaluation of clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters, we either kept the dosage or reduced the dose to 5 mg according to local regulations. We also collected data from the 16. and 24. weeks of the therapy. Primary endpoints were a clinical response (as a reduction in partial Mayo Score [pMayo] by minimum 3 points) or remission (as a Mayo score of the maximum of 2 points and without blood in stool) at week 8. Results Sixteen patients had received the induction therapy (mean age: 36 years, 7 males and 9 females) in our centre. After 8 weeks, 12 (75%) patients responded to the TFC induction therapy and 6 (37.5%) of them were in remission. Four patients were primary non-responders (25%). Corticosteroid therapy (18 ± 7 mg) was required during the induction in 4 responder cases, which could be stepped down by week 8. As a continuous maintenance therapy, 4 patients have already reached the 16th week and 8 have completed the 24th week. By the end of the follow-up, 12 patients responded and 10 was in remission. During the observation period, 3 patients had to remain on 10 mg TFC dose, 6 patients required dose escalation from 5 mg to 10 mg and 5 mg was sufficient in case of only 3 patients after the introduction. Endoscopic activity showed a moderate decrease from 2.5 ± 0.5 eMayo score to 2 ± 1 (n = 7) until week 16. In respect the responder patients, CRP levels decreased from the mean of 7.23 to 5.02. No serious side-effects were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion After the 8-week TFC induction therapy, the response rate was high and only every fourth patients were non-responder. A low number of patients had adequate reactions to the 5 mg-therapy after the introduction, but TFC is effective with dose-escalation in respect of clinical response and remission in patients with UC, who have had an inadequate response to previous biological therapy.

scholarly journals OP24 Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib induction therapy in patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results from the phase 3 U-ACHIEVE study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S022-S024
Author(s):  
S Danese ◽  
S Vermeire ◽  
W Zhou ◽  
A Pangan ◽  
J Siffledeen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background An unmet therapeutic need remains in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). U-ACHIEVE is one of two phase 3 induction trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of the selective Janus kinase–1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) 45 mg once daily (QD) in adults with UC. Methods U-ACHIEVE is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo (PBO)–controlled trial (NCT02819635) that randomized patients with moderately to severely active UC 2:1 to UPA 45 mg QD or PBO for 8 weeks. Patients were stratified by response to biologic therapy (inadequate vs non–inadequate responder), baseline corticosteroid use (yes or no), and baseline adapted Mayo score (≤7 or >7). The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (per adapted Mayo Score) at week 8.Ranked secondary endpoints included endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, and clinical response per adapted Mayo Score at week 8; clinical response per partial adapted Mayo Score at week 2; and histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement at week 8. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputations for missing data due to COVID-19 are reported. Safety was assessed through week 8. Results 474 patients were randomized (UPA, n=319; PBO, n=155). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA (26.1%) vs PBO (4.8%) achieved clinical remission at week 8 (adjusted treatment difference [95% CI], 21.6% [15.8, 27.4]; P<0.001; Figure 1). For all ranked secondary endpoints, UPA was superior to PBO (P<0.001; Figure 1). A significant difference in clinical response favouring UPA vs PBO was seen as early as week 2 (60.1% vs 27.3%) and was sustained over 8 weeks (79.0% vs 41.6%; Figure 2). There were more serious adverse events (AEs), severe AEs, and AEs leading to study drug discontinuation with PBO (Table 2). The most common AEs were acne, creatine phosphokinase elevation, and nasopharyngitis with UPA and worsening of UC and anaemia with PBO. Incidence of serious infection was similar between UPA and PBO. Neutropenia and lymphopenia were reported more frequently with UPA vs PBO (Table 2).No adjudicated gastrointestinal perforation, major cardiovascular AEs, or thrombotic events and no active tuberculosis, malignancy, or deaths were reported. Conclusion In patients with moderately to severely active UC, UPA 45 mg QD induction therapy was superior to PBO in inducing clinical remission/response, and endoscopic remission/response over 8 weeks; responses were significant and rapid. UPA 45 mg QD was well tolerated; safety was comparable with the known safety profile of UPA, and no new safety signals were identified.

scholarly journals P325 Real-World Effectiveness And Safety Of Ustekinumab In Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Multi-Centre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S349-S350
Author(s):  
D Parakkal ◽  
A Johnson ◽  
M Fenster ◽  
G Ramos ◽  
M Zulqarnain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Real World ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Previous Exposure ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Remission

Abstract Background Pivotal trials have shown that ustekinumab (UST) is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the population included in these trials do not always represent the cohort of patients treated in the “real world”. In this study, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of UST in a clinical cohort of patients with UC Methods We performed a multi-center cohort study and included patients with active UC starting UST. Variables collected included demographics, previous and current UC medications, disease activity (measured using partial and endoscopic Mayo score [PMS and EMS]) at 8 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up. We also abstracted UST drug level and anti-UST antibodies (AUA), albumin and C-reactive protein levels. Primary outcomes were clinical response at week 8 defined as a reduction of 3 points in the PMS or PMS<2. Secondary outcomes were clinical remission defined as a PMS <2 and endoscopic remission defined as a MES ≤1, and the development of an adverse event (AE) attributed to UST. Results Ninety-five patients were included with a median age of 42 years (IQR:32-57) and 53 (56%) were female. Median follow-up was 5 months (IQR:2.2-7.4). Only 4 (4.3%) were naïve to biologics or tofacitinib and 62 (66%) had previous exposure to at least 2 other biologics. No variables were found to be associated with response at week 8 (Figure 2). Those patients who responded at week 8 had higher median albumin levels vs those who did not (median of 4.4 [IQR: 4.1-4.6] vs 4.1 g/dL [IQR:3.8-4.3]; p=0.02). There were no differences in baseline CRP levels (1mg/dL [IQR:0.6-2.8] vs 0.6 mg/dL [0.3-1.5]; p=0.06). Among the 33 patients who had follow-up endoscopic assessment, 7 (21.2%) had achieved endoscopic remission and 4 (12%) achieved histologic remission. Median UST level was 4.1 mcg/ml (IQR:2.5-5.1) and no patients had detectable AUA. Five patients underwent colectomy (5.3%). Only 6 patients (6.6%) presented with an AE (all minor that included, rash, headaches, arthralgias and infection). Conclusion In a population enriched with refractory UC, UST was well tolerated and induce response and remission in a significant number of patients. The rate of response was lower in obese patients and those with extensive colitis but was not associated with previous exposure to biologics and/or tofacitinib. Larger studies with a longer follow-up are warranted. Figure 1: Rates of clinical response and remission in patients with UC receiving ustekinumab Figure 2: Association between several baseline characteristics and response to ustekinumab in UC

scholarly journals Long-term, Real-life, Observational Study in Treating Outpatient Ulcerative Colitis with Golimumab

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Tursi ◽  
Giammarco Mocci ◽  
Walter Elisei ◽  
Leonardo Allegretta ◽  
Raffaele Colucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Mayo Score

Background and Aims: Several studies have found Golimumab (GOL) effective and safe in the short-term treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but few long-term data are currently available from real world. Our aim was to assess the long-term real-life efficacy and safety of GOL in managing UC outpatients in Italy. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study assessing consecutive UC outpatients treated with GOL for at least 3-month of follow-up was made. Primary endpoints were the induction and maintenance of remission in UC, defined as Mayo score ≤2. Several secondary endpoints, including clinical response, colectomy rate, steroid free remission and mucosal healing, were also assessed during the follow-up. Results: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were enrolled and followed up for a median (IQR) time of 9 (3-18) months (mean time follow-up: 33.1±13 months). Clinical remission was achieved in 57 (32.1%) patients: these patients continued with GOL, but only 6 patients (3.4%) were still under clinical remission with GOL at the 42nd month of follow-up. Clinical response occurred in 64 (36.4%) patients; colectomy was performed in 8 (7.8%) patients, all of them having primary failure. Steroid-free remission occurred in 23 (12.9%) patients, and mucosal healing was achieved in 29/89 (32.6%) patients. Adverse events occurred in 14 (7.9%) patients. Conclusions: Golimumab does not seem able to maintain long-term remission in UC in real life. The safety profile was good.

scholarly journals A232 EFFICACY OF TOFACITINIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS: REAL-WORLD DATA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 108-109
Author(s):  
Y Xiao ◽  
P L Lakatos ◽  
R Bourdages ◽  
A Bitton ◽  
W Afif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Preliminary Analysis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Severe Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background A significant proportion of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) do not respond to therapy, which includes thiopurines, glucocorticoids, and antagonists to tumour necrosis factor-α and integrin. Tofacitinib, a Janus Kinase inhibitor, has emerged as an efficacious and safe treatment for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. However, it is not known if this efficacy translates into real-life effectiveness in a regular clinical practice. Aims We aimed to assess the rate of clinical response and clinical remission at 3 and 6 months after tofacitinib initiation. Secondary endpoints included rate of biomarker normalization, corticosteroids-free clinical remission and severe infections. Methods We conducted a multi-center retrospective observational study of adult patients with active UC started on tofacitinib from January 1, 2015 to October 1, 2019 at the McGill University Health Center and Hotel-Dieu de Lévis. A positive clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥3 in the partial Mayo score. Clinical remission was defined as partial Mayo score of ≤2. Biomarker normalization was defined as fecal calprotectin ≤250ug/g. Severe infection was defined as an infection requiring hospitalization. Results During the study period, 40 patients with UC were started on tofacitinib. Amongst the patients, 85% (n=34) had failed ≥1 biologic and 50% (n=20) had failed ≥3 biologics. At the time of this preliminary analysis, 38 patients had undergone 3 months of treatment and 30 patients had undergone 6 months of treatment. At 3 months, a clinical response was seen in 89.5% of patients (n=34) and clinical remission occurred in 63.2% (n=24). At 6 months, clinical response occurred in 73.3% of patients (n=22) and clinical remission was sustained in 53.33% (n=16). Biochemical normalization occurred in 29.0% (n=11) and 30.0% (n=9) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Additionally, 63.2% (n=24) and 43.3% of patients (n=13) achieved steroid-free clinical remission at 3 and 6 months, respectively. In the interim, one patient developed a serious infection requiring discontinuation of drug. Conclusions Our preliminary analysis demonstrates that in a real-life setting, tofacitinib is an effective treatment for inducing clinical remission in refractory UC patients. Further data will be complied to better assess the efficacy over a longer follow up. Funding Agencies None

scholarly journals P512 Efficacy of tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: real-world data

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S444-S445
Author(s):  
Y XIAO ◽  
P L Lakatos ◽  
R Bourdages ◽  
A Bitton ◽  
W Afif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Preliminary Analysis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Severe Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background A significant proportion of patients do not respond to therapy for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), including thiopurines, glucocorticoids, and antagonists to tumour necrosis factor-a and integrin. Tofacitinib, a Janus Kinase inhibitor, has emerged as an efficacious and safe treatment for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. However, data on its real-life efficacy remains sparse. Methods We aimed to assess the rate of clinical response and clinical remission at 3 and 6 months after tofacitinib initiation. Secondary endpoints included the rate of biomarker normalisation, corticosteroids-free clinical remission and severe infections. We conducted a multi-centre retrospective observational study of adult patients with active UC started on tofacitinib from January 1, 2015 to October 1, 2019 at the McGill University Health Center and Hotel-Dieu de Lévis. A positive clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥3 in the partial Mayo score. Clinical remission was defined as partial Mayo score of ≤2. Biomarker normalisation was defined as faecal calprotectin ≤250 μg/g. Severe infection was defined as an infection requiring hospitalisation. Results During the study period, 40 patients with UC were started on tofacitinib at 10 mg/kg twice a day. Amongst the patients, 85% (n = 34) had failed ≥1 biologic and 50% (n = 20) had failed ≥3 biologics. At the time of this preliminary analysis, 38 patients had undergone 3 months of treatment; 30 patients had undergone 6 months of treatment. At 3 months, a clinical response was seen in 89.5% of patients (n = 34) and clinical remission occurred in 63.2%(n = 24). At 6 months, clinical response occurred in 73.3% of patients (n = 22) and clinical remission was sustained in 53.33% (n = 16). Biochemical normalisation occurred in 29.0% (n = 11) and 30.0% (n = 9) at 3 and 6 months respectively. Additionally, 63.2% (n = 24) of patients and 43.3% (n = 13) of patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission at 3 and 6 months respectively. In the interim, one patient developed a serious infection requiring discontinuation of the drug. Conclusion Our preliminary analysis demonstrates that in a real-life setting, tofacitinib is an effective treatment for inducing clinical remission in refractory UC patients. Further data will be complied to better assess the efficacy over a longer follow-up.

scholarly journals P422 Tofacitinib induces clinical and endoscopic remission in biologic refractory ulcerative colitis patients: a real-world Belgian cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S384-S386 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cremer ◽  
T Lobaton ◽  
S Vieujan ◽  
P Bossuyt ◽  
J F Rahier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Rectal Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Stool Frequency ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Endoscopic Remission

Abstract Background Tofacitinib, an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, has been approved in 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in Europe. We report on real-world short-term efficacy and safety data from a multicenter Belgium refractory cohort of UC patients with prior exposure to both anti-TNFα and vedolizumab. Methods This is an observational, national, retrospective multicentre study including all UC active patients started on tofacitinib (10 mg BID) from 25 centres in Belgium between November 2018 and August 2019. Prospectively collected data were retrospectively analysed according to intention to treat. Primary endpoints were clinical and endoscopic response and remission rates at weeks 8 and 16. Clinical response and remission were defined as a reduction in the Modified Clinical Mayo score (rectal bleeding, stool frequency) of ≥2 and ≤1, respectively. Endoscopic response and remission were defined as a reduction in Endoscopic Mayo score of ≥1 and ≤1, respectively. Complete endoscopic remission was defined as an Endoscopic Mayo score of 0. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were calculated using Medcal 19.1. Results Demographic and baseline data of the 70 included patients are presented in Table 1. Of note is that nearly all patients were refractory to at least one anti-TNF and vedolizumab. Median follow-up was 16 weeks (IQR 13–26). Fifty-four per cent (38/70) of patients required prolonged induction at 10mg BID. Clinical evaluation was available in all patients at week 8 and 49 patients at week 16, while endoscopic data were available in 52 patients and 42 at weeks 8 and 16, respectively. Clinical response and remission, and endoscopic response and remission at weeks 8 and 16 are presented in Figures 1 and 2. Fifty per cent (21/42) of the patients under steroids at baseline could have stopped steroids at 16 weeks. Median baseline Modified Mayo score (rectal bleeding, stool frequency and endoscopy) decreased from 7 (IQR 5–8) to 4 (IQR 2–7) after 8 weeks (n = 49) (p < 0.0001), and down to 2 (IQR 1–5) at week 16 (n = 40) (p < 0.0001). Median CRP significantly decreased from baseline (5.3 mg/l, IQR [1.9–16.8]) to 1 mg/l at week 8 (IQR 0.5–6.2) (n = 49) (p = 0.003). Tofacitinib was well tolerated with only 1 reported case of single dermatome herpes zoster and no case of venous thromboembolism. Conclusion Tofacitinib very effectively induced short-term clinical and endoscopic response and remission even in a refractory cohort of patients with UC in a real-world clinical setting. During this short-term follow-up, tofacitinib was well tolerated with respect to adverse events.

scholarly journals P668 Real-life comparison of different anti-TNF biologic therapies for ulcerative colitis treatment: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S548-S549
Author(s):  
B Barberio ◽  
F Zingone ◽  
R D’Incà ◽  
C Marinelli ◽  
M C Maccarone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis Treatment ◽  
Similar Good

Abstract Background Currently, ulcerative colitis (UC) can be treated with different anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) drugs, which selection is mainly based on physician’s perspective. Indeed, head-to-head comparison studies evaluating the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-TNF drugs are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-TNF-α drugs used in clinical practice in a cohort of patients with moderate to severe UC. Methods Retrospectively, 122 UC patients treated with Infliximab (IFX) Originator and Biosimilar, Adalimumab (ADA) and Golimumab (GOL) were included. We performed an intention to treat analysis to evaluate the clinical response, clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopy response according to the different time-points of the follow-up (ie. after induction, at 30 and 52 weeks). Baseline and post-induction predictor factors of these outcomes were evaluated using multivariate logistic regressions models. Data were analyzed using STATA11 software. Results Overall clinical response was 79.5% after induction, 79.5% at 30 weeks, 75.4% at 52 weeks, while the overall steroid-free clinical remission was 42.6%, 45.1%, 55.7%, respectively. After induction, a higher rate of treatment failure was observed in GOL group. Moreover, at the end of follow-up, lower rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response were obtained by GOL (38.7% and 54.8% with p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively). At week 52, endoscopic response was achieved by 46.5% of the population (IFX Originator: 46.7%; IFX Biosimilar: 40%; ADA: 51.6%; GOL: 22.6%; p = 0.003). Conclusion Among the different anti-TNF treatment, moderate-to-severe UC seems to respond better to IFX and ADA, whereas GOL seems to be less effective, despite a similar good safety profile. Current possibility of optimising also GOL will clarify whether these discrepancies are due to reduced drug exposure to GOL.

scholarly journals P476 Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis: Real-world evidence from the ENEIDA registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S465-S466
Author(s):  
M Chaparro ◽  
A Garre ◽  
M Iborra ◽  
M Sierra ◽  
M Barreiro-de Acosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background The development program (UNIFI) has shown promising results of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment that should be confirmed in clinical practice. Aims Primary: to evaluate the durability of ustekinumab treatment in UC patients in clinical practice. Secondary: to assess the short-term response (at week 16) and the long-term effectiveness (at maximum follow-up) and to assess the safety of ustekinumab in clinical practice. Methods Patients included in the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry who received at least one intravenous dose of ustekinumab due to active UC [Partial Mayo Score (PMS) >2] were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on PMS. Results 95 patients were included (table 1). At week 16, 53% of patients had clinical response (including 35% of patients in remission) (figure 1). In the multivariate analysis, elevated serum C-reactive protein was the only variable significantly associated with clinical remission. Long-term remission is represented in figure 2. 36% of patients discontinued the treatment with ustekinumab during a median follow-up of 31 weeks. The probability of maintaining ustekinumab treatment was 87% at week 16, 63% at week 56, and 59% at week 72 (figure 3); primary failure was the main reason for ustekinumab discontinuation. No variable was associated with risk of discontinuation. Three patients reported adverse events; one of them had a fatal severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion Ustekinumab is effective both in the short and the long-term in real-life, even in a highly refractory cohort. Higher inflammatory burden at baseline correlated with lower probability of achieving remission. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ustekinumab.

scholarly journals P690 A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab, adalimumab, and golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: Real-life data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD)

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S561-S562
Author(s):  
F S Macaluso ◽  
M Ventimiglia ◽  
W Fries ◽  
A Viola ◽  
M Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background No real-life study aiming at comparing at the same time the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) in Ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently available. Methods Data of consecutive patients with UC treated with VDZ, ADA, and GOL from June 2015 to December 2018 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). A three-arms propensity score-adjusted analysis was performed to reduce bias caused by imbalanced covariates at baseline, including the proportion of TNF-α inhibitor naïve and non-naïve patients, using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) method. The effectiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks, 52 weeks, and as treatment persistence at the end of follow-up. The clinical endpoints were steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score <2 without steroid use) and clinical response (reduction of the partial Mayo score ≥2 points with a concomitant decrease of steroid dosage compared with baseline). The sum of the two outcomes was defined as a clinical benefit. The achievement of mucosal healing (endoscopic Mayo score 0–1) was assessed after at least 6 months of biological treatment. Results A total of 463 treatments (VDZ: n = 187; ADA: n = 168; GOL: n = 108) were included, with a median follow-up of 47.6 weeks (IQR 20.0–85.9). At 8 weeks, a clinical benefit was achieved in 70.6% patients treated with VDZ, in 68.5% patients treated with ADA, and in 67.6% patients treated with GOL (p = n.s. for all comparisons). After 52 weeks, VDZ showed better rates of clinical benefit compared with both ADA (71.6% vs. 47.5; OR: 2.79, 95% CI 1.63–4.79, p < 0.001) and GOL (71.6% vs. 40.2%; OR: 3.77, 95% CI 2.08–6.80, p < 0.001), while the difference between ADA and GOL was not significant. Cox survival analysis demonstrated that patients treated with VDZ had a reduced probability of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with ADA (HR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, p < 0.001) and GOL (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.19–0.46, p < 0.001), while patients treated with ADA had a reduced risk of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with GOL (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.50–1.00, p = 0.048). Post-treatment mucosal healing rates showed a numerical but non-significant difference in favour of VDZ (48.1%) compared with ADA and GOL (38.0% and 34.6%, respectively). Conclusion In the first study comparing at the same time the clinical effectiveness of VDZ, ADA, and GOL in UC patients via propensity score-adjusted analysis, VDZ was superior to both subcutaneous agents at 52 weeks and as treatment persistence, while ADA showed a superior treatment persistence compared with GOL.

scholarly journals P662 Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A real-world retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S545
Author(s):  
N Yoshimura ◽  
Soh Okano ◽  
Minako Sako ◽  
Masakazu Takazoe
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Response Level ◽  
Severe Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an orally active, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, recently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to corticosteroid. However, currently, there is inadequate evidence for efficacy of Tofacitinib in UC patients. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tofacitinib for inducing and maintaining remission in UC patients. Methods In a single-centre retrospective setting, 71 consecutive patients with UC who had failed to respond to corticosteroid or biologics were included. All patients had received 10mg Tofacitinib orally twice daily for at least 8 weeks as remission induction therapy and then, the responders received 5mg twice daily as maintenance therapy for up to 26 weeks. The clinical response and adverse events were evaluated at weeks 8 (induction) and 26 (maintenance). UC activity was assessed by the partial Mayo score. Clinical remission was defined as p-Mayo score ≤1 and the bleeding subscore = 0. Clinical response was defined as p-Mayo score ≤4 and a decrease of ≥3 points relative to baseline. Furthermore, the cumulative remission rates up to 26 weeks were determined by the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results At week 8, 24 of 71 patients (33.8%) achieved clinical remission and 20 (28.2%) achieved response level. The mean p-Mayo score fell from 5.8 ± 1.1 at entry to 3.5 ± 2.3 at week 2 (p < 0.01) and 2.3 ± 1.9 at week 8 (P<0.01). The average total cholesterol increased from 180.8 ± 36.0 mg/dl at entry to 206.8±39.3 mg/dl (p < 0.01). In anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α or vedolizumab (VDZ) naïve subgroup (n = 14), 8 patients (57.1%) achieved response level, while in biologic failure subgroup (n = 57), 36 patients (63.2%) achieved response level. In single biologic failure subgroup (n = 27), 19 patients (70.4%), in double biologics failure subgroup, 14 of 24 patients (58.3%), and in 3 biologics failure subgroup, 3 of 6 patients (50.0%) achieved response level, showing a decrease in the efficacy of Tofacitinib in patients who had failed more than one biologic. Furthermore, of the 25 patients followed for 26 weeks, 23 (92.0%) sustained remission at week 16 and 19 (76.0%) at week 26. Herpes virus infection occurred in 4 patients. The increase in total cholesterol was observed in 68.8% of the patients. Conclusion Our retrospective efficacy assessment indicated that Tofacitinib was effective and safe for inducing and maintaining remission in corticosteroid refractory UC patients, regardless of biologic naïve or failure background. The efficacy of 10mg twice daily was rapid and observed within 2 weeks of starting the treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document