Impact of an adaptive CRT optimization algorithm on the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrythmias of heart failure patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Briongos Figuero ◽  
A Estevez ◽  
M.L Perez ◽  
J.B Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
L Alvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Remote Monitoring System ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm provides ambulatory CRT optimization and synchronized left-ventricular pacing instead of conventional biventricular pacing. Purpose To analyze the impact of aCRT on the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrythmia (VA) in patients with concomitant defibrillator therapy. Methods Symptomatic HF patients, in sinus rhythm, with LVEF ≤35% and QRS complex ≥130 ms undergoing first CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) implant were collected from the multicentre, prospective and nationwide UMBRELLA study (2012–2017). All device information was automatically stored and collected through the remote monitoring system. An experts committee analysed in a blinded manner all electrograms. The endpoint was first appropriate therapy (AT) delivered within ventricular fibrillation zone at 12-months follow-up. Results 206 patients were collected (66.1±8.7 years; 73.3% male). Fifty nine patients composed the aCRT group and 147 composed the non-aCRT group. At implant, LBBB was present in 93% of patients, functional class III or IV in 69.9%, non-ischemic HF in 63.1% of patients and mean LVEF was 26.5±5.6%. Optimal medical treatment was achieved in a majority (B-blockers in 92%; RAASi in 89% and MRA in 72.2%). The percentage of ventricular pacing through 12 months was 96.1±9.4% in non-aCRT patients and 97.5±2.7% in aCRT patients (p=0.261). At 1-year of follow-up, 16 patients were delivered an AT (event rate: 7.8%). Most of these episodes (n=14) were due to sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia while the rest were caused by sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/VF. A lower incidence of AT was observed in aCRT patients (3.4%) compared to non-aCRT patients (9.5%) but with no statistical differences (OR=0.33, CI 0.07–1.51, p=0.155). Conclusions In patients undergoing CRT provided by aCRT algorithm the risk of malign VA after 1-year of follow-up was low. Randomized studies are needed to clarify the impact of this dynamic algorithm on the arrhythmic risk of HF patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Biventricular pacing-induced acute response in baroreflex sensitivity has predictive value for midterm response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 297 (1) ◽  
pp. H233-H237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike G. J. Gademan ◽  
Rutger J. van Bommel ◽  
C. Jan Willem Borleffs ◽  
SumChe Man ◽  
Joris C. W. Haest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Baroreflex Sensitivity ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Arterial Baroreflex ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Acute Response

In a previous study we demonstrated that the institution of biventricular pacing in chronic heart failure (CHF) acutely facilitates the arterial baroreflex. The arterial baroreflex has important prognostic value in CHF. We hypothesized that the acute response in baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) after the institution of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has predictive value for midterm response. One day after implantation of a CRT device in 33 CHF patients (27 male/6 female; age, 66.5 ± 9.5 yr; left ventricular ejection fraction, 28 ± 7%) we measured noninvasive BRS and heart rate variability (HRV) in two conditions: CRT device switched on and switched off (on/off order randomized). Echocardiography was performed before implantation (baseline) and 6 mo after implantation (follow-up). CRT responders were defined as patients in whom left ventricular end-systolic volume at follow-up had decreased by ≥15%. Responders (69.7%) and nonresponders (30.3%) had similar baseline characteristics. In responders, CRT increased BRS by 30% ( P = 0.03); this differed significantly ( P = 0.02) from the average BRS change (−2%) in the nonresponders. CRT also increased HRV by 30% in responders ( P = 0.02), but there was no significant difference found compared with the increase in HRV (8%) in the nonresponders. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the percent BRS increase had predictive value for the discrimination of responders and nonresponders (area under the curve, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.87; maximal accuracy, 0.70). Our study demonstrates that a CRT-induced acute BRS increase has predictive value for the echocardiographic response to CRT. This finding suggests that the autonomic nervous system is actively involved in CRT-related reverse remodeling.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: optimization and follow-up

2015 ◽  
pp. 420-431
Author(s):  
Marta Sitges ◽  
Genevieve Derumeaux
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Cardiac Imaging Techniques ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac imaging techniques have an important role in the follow-up of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as they provide objective evidence of changes in cardiac dimensions and function. The role of echocardiography is well established in the assessment of left ventricular reverse remodelling and the evaluation of secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation. Additionally, echocardiography might be used for optimizing the programming of atrio-ventricular (AV) and inter-ventricular (VV) delays of current CRT devices. Acute benefits from this optimization have been demonstrated, but longer follow-up studies have failed to show a clear benefit of optimized CRT on top of simultaneous biventricular pacing on the outcome of patients with CRT. This chapter reviews the role of imaging in assessing follow-up and outcome of patients undergoing CRT, as well as the rationale, the methods used, and the clinical impact of optimization of the programming of CRT devices.

scholarly journals Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Induced by Left Ventricular Pacing

Circulation ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 109 (23) ◽  
pp. 2924-2925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Máximo Rivero-Ayerza ◽  
Marc Vanderheyden ◽  
Sofie Verstreken ◽  
Marc de Zutter ◽  
Peter Geelen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular Pacing

P5680One-year outcomes of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy using adaptivCRT algorithm

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Briongos Figuero ◽  
A Estevez ◽  
M L Perez ◽  
J B Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
L Alvarez-Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm provides synchronized left ventricular (LV) only pacing and ambulatory optimization of the intrinsic atrioventricular and interventricular conduction intervals. Studies reporting morbidity and mortality outcomes of aCRT carriers in daily clinical practice are lacking. Purpose To determine in a real-life setting, whether 1-year outcomes were different among CRT carriers undergoing aCRT pacing and those under conventional biventricular (biV) pacing. Methods Symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with sinus rhythm undergoing first CRT-defibrillator implant were selected from the UMBRELLA nationwide registry (2012–2017). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 12-month follow-up. HF admission was defined as hospitalization due to symptoms requiring intravenous diuretic treatment. Primary healthcare records were used to prospectively collect all data. Results Two hundred and six patients were collected (66.1±8.7 years; 73.3% male). Eighty-seven out of 206 patients were implanted with an aCRT capable device, but this algorithm was activated at implant and remained enabled at 1-year in 59 patients (aCRT group). The other 147 patients composed the non-aCRT group. At implant left bundle branch block was present in 93% of patients, 69.6% of population was in functional class III or IV and mean left ventricle ejection fraction was of 26.5±5.6%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 63.1% of patients and optimal medical treatment was achieved in majority of population (92% of patients with beta-blockers; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsor angiotensin II receptor blockersin 89%). The percentage of ventricular pacing through 12 months was 96.1±9.4% in non-aCRT patients and 97.5±2.7% in aCRT patients (p=0.261). In aCRT patients, LV-only pacing accounted for a mean of 53.3±37.6% of all ventricular pacing. After 12-month follow-up period, 25 patients (12.1%) met the primary composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization. Nine patients died and nineteen patients were admitted due to worsening HF. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause death or HF hospitalization between aCRT and non-aCRT patients (10.2% vs. 12.9% respectively; OR=0.76, CI: 0.29–2.01, p=0.585) Conclusions In this contemporary cohort of HF patients undergoing CRT with high percentages of ventricular pacing, clinical performance of aCRT algorithm was adequate. The risk of death or HF hospitalization was low and no differences were observed at one-year follow-up. Future randomized studies will clarify the role of this algorithm in CRT carriers. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Optimization and follow-up

2021 ◽  
pp. 587-597
Author(s):  
Marta Sitges ◽  
Erwan Donal
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Cardiac Imaging Techniques ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac imaging techniques have an important role in the follow-up of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as they provide objective evidence of changes in cardiac dimensions and function. The role of echocardiography is well established in the assessment of left ventricular reverse remodelling and the evaluation of secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation. Additionally, echocardiography might be used for optimizing the programming of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays of current CRT devices. Acute benefit from this optimization has been demonstrated, but longer follow-up studies have failed to show a clear benefit of optimized CRT on top of simultaneous biventricular pacing on the outcome of patients with CRT. This chapter reviews the role of imaging in assessing follow-up and outcome of patients undergoing CRT as well as the rationale, the methods used, and the clinical impact of optimization of the programming of CRT devices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document