scholarly journals P351Seamless integration of three-dimensional rotational angiography image into electroanatomical mapping system to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii61-iii62
Author(s):  
S. Fujita ◽  
E. Fujii ◽  
Y. Kagawa ◽  
K. Inoue ◽  
T. Yamada ◽  
...  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahendra Carpen ◽  
John Matkins ◽  
George Syros ◽  
Maxim V. Gorev ◽  
Zoubin Alikhani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kazuhisa Matsumoto ◽  
Takeshi Tobiume ◽  
Tomomi Matsuura ◽  
Takayuki Ise ◽  
Kenya Kusunose ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Previous studies examined the right atrial (RA) input site of the antegrade fast pathway (AFp) (AFpI). However, the left atrial (LA) input to the atrioventricular (AV) node has not been extensively evaluated. In this study, we created three-dimensional (3-D) bi-atrial stimulus-ventricle (St-V) maps and analyzed the input site and characteristics of the AFp in both the RA and LA. Methods Forty-four patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or WPW syndrome were included in this study. Three-dimensional bi-atrial St-V mapping was performed using an electroanatomical mapping system. Sites exhibiting the minimal St-V interval (MinSt-V) were defined as AFpIs and were classified into seven segments, four in the RA (F, S, M, and I) and three in the LA (M1, M2, and M3). By combining the MinSt-V in the RA and LA, the AFpIs were classified into three types: RA, LA, and bi-atrial (BA) types. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared. Results AFpIs were most frequently observed at site S in the RA (34%) and M2 in the LA (50%), and the BA type was the most common (57%). AFpIs in the LA were recognized in 75% of the patients. There were no clinical or electrophysiological indicators for predicting AFpI sites. Conclusions Three-dimensional bi-atrial St-V maps could classify AFpIs in both the RA and LA. AFpIs in the LA were frequently recognized. There were no significant clinical or electrophysiological indicators for predicting AFpI sites, and 3-D bi-atrial St-V mapping was the only method to reveal the precise AFp input site.


Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001207
Author(s):  
Kathryn Lauren Hong ◽  
Jazlyn Borges ◽  
Benedict Glover

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, with a prevalence that increases alongside the ageing population worldwide. The management of AF involves restoration of sinus rhythm through antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Yet, these medications have only modest efficacy in achieving long-term success, have not shown to result in a mortality benefit, are frequently not tolerated and have associated adverse side effects. Therefore, catheter ablation has become a valuable treatment approach for AF and even a viable first-line strategy in select cases. Traditionally, the combination of radiofrequency energy and a three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system has been used to guide catheter ablation for AF. However, single-procedural efficacy and long-term outcomes still remain suboptimal for many patients, particularly those with persistent or long-standing AF. Recent advances in ablation technology and strategy, therefore, provide new procedural approaches for catheter-based treatment with the aim of overcoming current challenges in procedural duration and overall success. The aim of this paper was to provide an updated review of the current practices and techniques relating to ablation for AF and to compare the use of these strategies for paroxysmal and persistent AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document