Rotational Activation Pattern During Functional Substrate Mapping: Novel Target for Catheter Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

Background: Recent advancements in a 3-dimensional mapping system allow for the assessment of detailed conduction properties during sinus rhythm and thus the establishment of a strategy targeting functionally abnormal regions in scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). We hypothesized that a rotational activation pattern (RAP) observed in maps during baseline rhythm was associated with the critical location of VT. Methods: We retrospectively examined the pattern of wavefront propagation during sinus rhythm in patients with scar-related VT. The prevalence and features of the RAP on critical VT circuits were analyzed. RAP was defined as >90° of inward curvature directly above or at the edge of the slow conductive areas. Results: Forty-five VTs in 37 patients (66±15 years old, 89% male, 27% ischemic heart disease) were evaluated. High-density substrate mapping during sinus rhythm (median, 2524 points) was performed using the CARTO3 system before VT induction. Critical sites for reentry were identified by direct termination by radiofrequency catheter ablation in 21 VTs or by pace mapping in 12 VTs. Among them, RAP was present in 70% of the 33 VTs. Four VTs had no RAP at the critical sites during sinus rhythm, but it became visible in the mappings with different wavefront directions. Six VTs, in which intramural or epicardial isthmus was suspected, were rendered noninducible by radiofrequency catheter ablation to the endocardial surface without RAP. RAP had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 89%, respectively, for predicting the elements in the critical zone for VT. Conclusions: The critical zone of VT appears to correspond to an area characterized by the RAP with slow conduction during sinus rhythm, which facilitates targeting areas specific for reentry. However, this may not be applicable to intramural VT substrates and might be affected by the direction of wavefront propagation to the scar during mapping.

471 Arrhythmia-free survival in early-persistent atrial fibrillation patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation

Aims Despite advances in success rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation, outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with persistent AF are highly variable. Early persistent AF (EPsAF) is defined as AF that is sustained beyond 7 days but is less than 3 months in duration. Arrhythmia-free survival data after RFCA in this specific population are still limited. We sought to report the outcomes of RFCA in the subgroup of patients with EPsAF, compared to those with PAF and with ‘late’ persistent AF (LPsAF) lasting between 3 and 12 months. Methods and results Data from 1143 consecutive AF patients receiving their first RFCA were prospectively collected. Patients with EPsAF (n = 190) were compared with PAF (n = 531) and LPsAF (n = 422) patients. All patients received pulmonary vein antrum isolation + posterior wall and sustained non-pulmonary vein (PV) trigger ablation. Non-sustained non-PV triggers were ablated based on operator discretion. Non-PV triggers were defined as sites of firing leading to sustained (>30 s) or non-sustained arrhythmias (<30 s, including premature atrial contractions ≥10 beats/min) with earliest activation outside the PVs. Mean age of the population was 64 ± 11 years. Female patients were more in PAF group (39%) compared to EPsAF (26%) and LPsAF (28%) (P < 0.001). There was no difference in other clinical characteristics among populations. Non-PV triggers were detected more in EPsAF [127 (66.8%)], and LPsAF [296 (70.1%)] patients compared to PAF [185 (34.8%)] (P < 0.001).One-year arrhythmia-free survival rate after a single procedure was 75.0% (398), 74.2% (141), and 64.5% (272) in PAF, EPsAF, and LPsAF, respectively. Success rate was significantly higher in PAF {[HR: 0.67 (0.53, 0.84), P = 0.001] and EPsAF [HR: 0.67 (0.49, 0.93)], P = 0.015} compared to LPsAF. Conclusions In patients with EPsAF, RFCA may result in significantly better freedom from atrial arrhythmias, compared to LPsAF. In this cohort, ablation might be reasonable as first line approach to improve outcomes and prevent AF progression.