scholarly journals Artificial intelligence assessment for early detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on electrocardiographic features

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-myoung Kwon ◽  
Kyung-Hee Kim ◽  
Howard J Eisen ◽  
Younghoon Cho ◽  
Ki-Hyun Jeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Normal Left Ventricular

Abstract Aims Although heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a rapidly emerging global health problem, an adequate tool to screen it reliably and economically does not exist. We developed an interpretable deep learning model (DLM) using electrocardiography (ECG) and validated its performance. Methods and results This retrospective cohort study included two hospitals. 34 103 patients who underwent echocardiography and ECG within 1 week and indicated normal left ventricular systolic function were included in this study. A DLM based on an ensemble neural network was developed using 32 671 ECGs of 20 169 patients. The internal validation included 1979 ECGs of 1979 patients. Furthermore, we conducted an external validation with 11 955 ECGs of 11 955 patients from another hospital. The endpoint was to detect HFpEF. During the internal and external validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of a DLM using 12-lead ECG for detecting HFpEF were 0.866 (95% confidence interval 0.850–0.883) and 0.869 (0.860–0.877), respectively. In the 1412 individuals without HFpEF at initial echocardiography, patients whose DLM was defined as having a higher risk had a significantly higher chance of developing HFpEF than those in the low-risk group (33.6% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001). Sensitivity map showed that the DLM focused on the QRS complex and T-wave. Conclusion The DLM demonstrated high performance for HFpEF detection using not only a 12-lead ECG but also 6- single-lead ECG. These results suggest that HFpEF can be screened using conventional ECG devices and diverse life-type ECG machines employing the DLM, thereby preventing disease progression.

scholarly journals Central and obstructive apneas prevalence in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Borrelli ◽  
P Sciarrone ◽  
F Gentile ◽  
N Ghionzoli ◽  
G Mirizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
2D Echocardiography

Abstract Background Central apneas (CA) and obstructive apneas (OA) are highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) both with reduced and preserved systolic function. However, a comprehensive evaluation of apnea prevalence across HF according to ejection fraction (i.e HF with patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction- HFrEf, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively) throughout the 24 hours has never been done before. Materials and methods 700 HF patients were prospectively enrolled and then divided according to left ventricular EF (408 HFrEF, 117 HFmrEF, 175 HFpEF). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation including: 2D echocardiography; 24-h Holter-ECG monitoring; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; neuro-hormonal assessment and 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring. Results In the whole population, prevalence of normal breathing (NB), CA and OA at daytime was 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively, while at nighttime 15%, 55%, and 30%, respectively. When stratified according to left ventricular EF, CA prevalence decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF and HFpEF: (daytime CA: 57% vs. 43% vs. 42%, respectively, p=0.001; nighttime CA: 66% vs. 48% vs. 34%, respectively, p<0.0001), while OA prevalence increased (daytime OA: 5% vs. 8% vs. 18%, respectively, p<0.0001; nighttime OA: 20 vs. 29 vs. 53%, respectively, p<0.0001). When assessing moderte-severe apneas, defined with an apnea/hypopnea index >15 events/hour, prevalence of CA was again higher in HFrEF than HFmrEF and HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe CA: 28% vs. 19% and 23%, respectively, p<0.05) and at nighttime (nighttime moderate-severe CA: 50% vs. 39% and 28%, respectively, p<0.05). Conversely, moderate-severe OA decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF to HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe OA: 1% vs. 3% and 8%, respectively, p<0.05) and nighttime (noghttime moderate-severe OA: 10% vs. 11% and 30%, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusions Daytime and nighttime apneas, both central and obstructive in nature, are highly prevalent in HF regardless of EF. Across the whole spectrum of HF, CA prevalence increases and OA decreases as left ventricular systolic dysfunction progresses, both during daytime and nighttime. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Non-invasive intraventricular pressure differences estimated with cardiac MRI in subjects without heart failure and with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e001088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Londono-Hoyos ◽  
Patrick Segers ◽  
Zeba Hashmath ◽  
Garrett Oldland ◽  
Maheshwara Reddy Koppula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Diastolic Filling ◽  
Spatiotemporal Pattern ◽  
Intraventricular Pressure ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

ObjectiveNon-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic function is important to better understand physiological abnormalities in heart failure (HF). The spatiotemporal pattern of LV blood flow velocities during systole and diastole can be used to estimate intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs). We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of an MRI-based method to calculate systolic and diastolic IVPDs in subjects without heart failure (No-HF), and with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).MethodsWe studied 159 subjects without HF, 47 subjects with HFrEF and 32 subjects with HFpEF. Diastolic and systolic intraventricular flow was measured using two-dimensional in-plane phase-contrast MRI. The Euler equation was solved to compute IVPDs in diastole (mitral base to apex) and systole (apex to LV outflow tract).ResultsSubjects with HFpEF demonstrated a higher magnitude of the early diastolic reversal of IVPDs (−1.30 mm Hg) compared with the No-HF group (−0.78 mm Hg) and the HFrEF group (−0.75 mm Hg; analysis of variance p=0.01). These differences persisted after adjustment for clinical variables, Doppler-echocardiographic parameters of diastolic filling and measures of LV structure (No-HF=−0.72; HFrEF=−0.87; HFpEF=−1.52 mm Hg; p=0.006). No significant differences in systolic IVPDs were found in adjusted models. IVPD parameters demonstrated only weak correlations with standard Doppler-echocardiographic parameters.ConclusionsOur findings suggest distinct patterns of systolic and diastolic IVPDs in HFpEF and HFrEF, implying differences in the nature of diastolic dysfunction between the HF subtypes.

Abstract 16989: Impaired Systolic Function Assessed by Strain Imaging Predicts Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amil M Shah ◽  
Brian Claggett ◽  
Nancy K Sweitzer ◽  
Sanjiv J Shah ◽  
Inder S Anand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Strain Imaging ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
History Of ◽  
Lv Systolic Function

Introduction: Left ventricular (LV) systolic function by strain imaging is impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but its prognostic relevance is not known. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that worse longitudinal strain (LS) is independently associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: LS was assessed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in a blinded core laboratory at baseline in 447 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥45%) enrolled in the Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial and was related to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, HF hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest, and its components. Results: At a median follow-up of 2.6 (IQR 1.5-3.9) years, 115 patients experienced the primary outcome. Impaired LS, defined as an absolute LS < 15.8%, was present in 53% of patients and was associated with the composite outcome (adjusted HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.26-3.66; p=0.005), CV death alone (adjusted HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.44-7.12; p=0.004), and HF hospitalization alone (adjusted HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.16-4.28; p=0.016) after adjusting for age, gender, race, randomization strata (prior HF hospitalization vs elevated B-type natriuretic peptide level), region of enrollment (Americas vs Russia or Georgia), randomized treatment assignment, history of atrial fibrillation, heart rate, New York Heart Association class, history of stroke, creatinine, hematocrit, LVEF, mass, end-systolic volume index, and E/E’ ratio. These findings were similar in the subgroup of 354 patients with LVEF ≥55%. Conclusions: Among HFpEF patients enrolled in TOPCAT, impaired LV systolic function, measured by LS, is predictive of adverse CV outcomes independent of clinical and conventional echocardiographic predictors. Impaired LS represents a novel imaging biomarker to identify HFpEF patients at particularly high risk for CV morbidity and mortality.

Abstract 5882: Myocardial Contractile Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry A Borlaug ◽  
Carolyn S Lam ◽  
Veronique Roger ◽  
Richard J Rodeheffer ◽  
Margaret M Redfield
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Myocardial Contractility ◽  
Ventricular Remodeling ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Background Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have diastolic dysfunction, but are traditionally considered to have normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, ventricular remodeling can result in preservation of EF despite abnormal myocardial contractility. Methods We performed echo-Doppler characterization of LV chamber and myocardial systolic properties in a population-based study, comparing patients with HFpEF (N=244) to healthy controls (CON, N=617), and hypertensives without HF (HTN, N=719), then examined long term outcome. Results All subjects had a normal EF (>50%). However, systolic chamber function, measured by wall stress-corrected endocardial fractional shortening (sc-eFS), was impaired in HFpEF (96±12%) compared to both CON (100±8%, p<0.0001) and HTN (108±11%, p<0.0001). Myocardial contractility, assessed by wall stress-corrected midwall shortening (sc-mFS), was also reduced in HFpEF (91±13%) compared to CON (100±10%, p<0.0001) and HTN (105±12%, p<0.0001). HTN had increased sc-eFS and sc-mFS compared with both HFpEF and CON (p<0.0001). In HFpEF, impaired sc-mFS was associated with increased mortality, independent of age (Figure ), while EF and sc- eFS were not. Conclusions Despite preservation of EF, unselected HFpEF patients from the community have significantly impaired systolic chamber function and depressed myocardial contractility. Abnormal myocardial contractility in HFpEF is associated with increased mortality. These data suggest that myocardial systolic dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of HFpEF and may represent a potential therapeutic target.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (diastolic heart failure)

2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (51) ◽  
pp. 2030-2040 ◽  
Author(s):  
István Czuriga ◽  
Attila Borbély ◽  
Dániel Czuriga ◽  
Zoltán Papp ◽  
István Édes
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Diastolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Normal Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Dimensions ◽  
Ventricular Dimensions

Diastolic heart failure, which is also called as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, is a clinical syndrome in which patients have signs and symptoms of heart failure, normal or near normal left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) and evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Recent epidemiological studies have demonstrated that more than half of all heart failure patients have diastolic heart failure. The syndrome is more common in women than in men and the prevalence increases with age. Patients with diastolic heart failure form a fairly heterogeneous group with complex pathophysiologic mechanisms. The disease is often in association with other comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus or obesity. The diagnosis of diastolic heart failure is best achieved by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, which can detect abnormal myocardial relaxation, decreased compliance and increased filling pressure in the setting of normal left ventricular dimensions and preserved ejection fraction. Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there is no such an evidence-based treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, which would improve clinical outcomes. Thus, pharmacological therapy of diastolic heart failure is based mainly on empiric data, and aims to the normalization of blood pressure, reduction of left ventricular dimensions and increased heart rate, maintenance of normal atrial contraction and treatment of symptoms caused by congestion. Beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers may be utilized in patients with diastolic dysfunction, especially in those with hypertension. Beta-blockers appear to be useful in lowering heart rate and thereby prolonging left ventricular diastolic filling time, while diuretic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for preventing pulmonary congestion. Nonetheless, treatment of the underlying disease is also an important therapeutic approach. This review summarizes the state of current knowledge with regard to diastolic heart failure. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 2030–2040.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document