The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection

Background:One of the forms of ost-operative care after open heart surgery is controlling the pain resulting from chest tube insertion. Management of pain is considered vital and requires the awareness of health care providers. One of the main responsibilities of nurses is to prepare patients for invasive procedures such as the removal of the chest tube. This study was designed to analyze the impact of a loved one’s voice for distraction in patients undergoing open heart surgery.Methods:This study was a clinical trial. The research sample was randomly selected from patients undergoing open heart surgery. In this study, the number of samples for each group was considered to be 64 people, where the total number of samples was 128 people. The data collection tools included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessment tool and a researcher-made questionnaire. After selecting the eligible samples and obtaining the informed consent, each patient was randomly assigned to one of the two groups (intervention group and control group). The pain was measured before, immediately, and 10 minutes after removing the chest tube.Results:The findings of this study indicated that the two groups had no statistically significant differences in pain before chest tube removal. The mean pain during chest tube removal and 10 minutes later in both groups indicated a significant difference based on Mann-Whitney test (P<0.001).Conclusion:This study showed that a loved one’s voice is effective in reducing pain during chest tube removal after open heart surgery.

Download Full-text

Low suction on digital drainage devices promptly improves post-operative air leaks following lung resection operations: a retrospective study

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery ◽

10.1186/s13019-021-01485-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Suguru Mitsui ◽

Shunsuke Tauchi ◽

Takahiro Uchida ◽

Hisashi Ohnishi ◽

Toshio Shimokawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chest Tube ◽

Pulmonary Resection ◽

Lung Resection ◽

Low Pressure ◽

Volume Of Fluid ◽

Suction Pressure ◽

Air Leaks ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Chest Tube Removal ◽

Pressure Suction

Abstract Background We investigated the most effective suction pressure for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks on digital drainage devices after lung resection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of 242 patients who were monitored with a digital drainage system after pulmonary resection in our institution between December 2017 and June 2020. We divided the patients into three groups according to the suction pressure used: A (low-pressure suction group: − 5 cm H2O), B (intermediate-pressure group: − 10 cm H2O), and C (high-pressure suction group: − 20 cm H2O). We evaluated the duration of air leaks, timing of chest tube replacement, the amount of postoperative air leak, volume of fluid drained before chest tube removal, and the total number of air leaks during drainage. Results In total, 217 patients were included in this study. The duration of air leaks gradually decreased with significant difference between the groups, the highest decrease in A, the lowest decrease in C (P = 0.019). Timing of chest tube replacement, on the other hand, did not significantly differ between the three groups (P = 0.126). The number of postoperative air leaks just after surgery did not significantly differ between the three groups (P = 0.175), but the number of air leaks on postoperative day 1 were fewest in group A, then B, and greatest in group C (P = 0.033). The maximum amount of air leaks during drainage was lowest in A, then B, and highest in C (P = 0.036). Volume of fluid drained before chest tube removal did not significantly differ between the three groups (P = 0.986). Conclusion Low-pressure suction after pulmonary resection seems to avoid or promptly improve postoperative air leaks in digital drainage devices after lung resection. Trial registration This is a single-institution, retrospective analysis-based study of data from an electronic database. Study protocol was approved by the Akashi Medical Center Institutional Research Ethics Board (approval number: 2020–9).

Download Full-text

Early postoperative day 0 chest tube removal using a digital drainage device protocol after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection

Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery ◽

10.1093/icvts/ivaa170 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 31 (5) ◽

pp. 657-663

Author(s):

Karel Pfeuty ◽

Bernard Lenot

Keyword(s):

Chest Tube ◽

Pulmonary Resection ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Lung Resection ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Cardiopulmonary Complication ◽

Drainage Device ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Chest Tube Removal

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early chest tube removal on postoperative day 0 (POD 0) on the basis of a digital drainage device protocol in patients undergoing thoracoscopic major lung resection and its contribution as a component of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. METHODS One hundred consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy were submitted to the following criteria for chest tube removal: Air flow ≤20 ml/min for at least 4 h without fluid threshold, except if haemorrhagic or chylous. Two groups were defined according to chest tube removal on POD 0 (G0) or POD ≥1 (G1). Primary outcome was pleural complication and secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary complication, length of drainage, length of stay (LOS), compliance with opioid-free analgesic protocol and readmission. The follow-up was 90 days from discharge. RESULTS The chest tube was removed on POD 0 in 45% of patients (G0). None of them required tube reinsertion for pneumothorax and 1 patient was readmitted for a delayed pleural effusion. Among the 55% remaining patients (G1), the median length of drainage was 2 days, including 3 prolonged air leaks (>5 days). G0 and G1 were not different in terms of cardiopulmonary complication and readmission (6.6% vs 9% and 4.4% vs 7.2%, respectively). The median LOS was 1 day in G0 and 2 days in G1. The compliance with opioid-free analgesic protocol was significantly higher (75% vs 45%, P = 0.004) in G0 compared to G1. CONCLUSIONS Early POD 0 chest tube removal after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection is safe in selected patients on the basis of a digital drainage device protocol. Also, it may contribute, by reducing early postoperative pain, to enhance postoperative recovery as part of an advanced enhanced recovery after surgery programme.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Air Leaks With Prompt Improvement of Low Suction on Digital Drainage Devices: a Retrospective Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-133495/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Suguru Mitsui ◽

Shunsuke Tauchi ◽

Takahiro Uchida ◽

Hisashi Ohnishi ◽

Toshio Shimokawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chest Tube ◽

Pulmonary Resection ◽

Maximum Amount ◽

Fluid Volume ◽

Suction Pressure ◽

Air Leak ◽

Air Leaks ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Chest Tube Removal ◽

Pressure Suction

Abstract Purpose: The aim was to investigate the most effective suction pressure for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of 242 patients who were monitored with a digital drainage system after pulmonary resection between December 2017 and June 2020. We divided the patients into 3 of group by suction pressure, A (Low-pressure suction group: -5 cm H₂O), B (Intermediate-pressure group: -10 cm H₂O), C (High-pressure suction group: -20 cm H₂O). Duration of air leaks, duration of chest tube replacement, the amount of postoperative air leak, fluid volume drained before chest tube removal, and the maximum amount of air leaks during drainage were evaluated.Results: A total 217 patients were included. In the order of A, B, and C groups, duration of air leaks gradually decreased and significant trend was observed (p=0.019). Duration of chest tube replacement did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.126). The amount of postoperative air leak just after surgery did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.175), however, the amount of postoperative day 1 air leak gradually decreased with statistical significance in order of A, B, and C groups (p=0.033). The maximum amount of air leaks during drainage gradually decreased in order of A, B and C groups (p=0.036). Fluid volume drained before chest tube removal did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.986).Conclusion: Low-pressure suction after pulmonary resection would be useful for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.

Download Full-text

What Keeps Postpulmonary Resection Patients in Hospital?

Canadian Respiratory Journal ◽

10.1155/2003/610570 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 86-89 ◽

Cited By ~ 46

Author(s):

T Bardell ◽

D Petsikas

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Linear Regression ◽

Chest Tube ◽

Pulmonary Resection ◽

Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Air Leak ◽

Air Leaks ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Prolonged Air Leak ◽

Chest Tube Removal

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak (longer than three days) was hypothesized to be the primary cause of extended hospital stays following pulmonary resection. Its effect on length of stay (LOS) was compared with that of suboptimal pain control, nausea and vomiting, and other causes. Predictors of prolonged LOS and of prolonged air leaks were investigated.DESIGN: Retrospective review of 91 patients. Primary reasons for prolonged hospitalization were determined. Patient characteristics (demographic information, pulmonary function test results, body habitus measurements, smoking history), operative factors (procedure performed, duration of operation, complications) and postoperative factors (time of chest tube removal) were considered. Student'sttest andX2analysis were used to compare continuous and ratio data, respectively, and linear regression analysis was used to define the equation relating two variables.RESULTS: The mean postoperative LOS was 6.4 days. Only prolonged air leak was predictive of increased LOS (9.4 days versus 5.4 days, P<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s less than 1.5 L/min, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity less than 80% predicted and the detection of a pneumothorax were all predictive of prolonged air leak. A strong correlation between the time of chest tube removal and LOS was found (r=0.937, P<0.001). Linear regression analysis showed postoperative LOS and duration of thoracostomy tube insertion to be related by the equation y = 0.88x + 2.49 days.CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that increased LOS following pulmonary resection is due primarily to prolonged air leaks. Furthermore, patients who have their chest tubes removed sooner are discharged sooner.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Air Leaks with Prompt Improvement of Low Suction on Digital Drainage Devices: A Retrospective Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-99705/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Suguru Mitsui ◽

Shunsuke Tauchi ◽

Takahiro Uchida ◽

Hisashi Ohnishi ◽

Toshio Shimokawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chest Tube ◽

Pulmonary Resection ◽

Maximum Amount ◽

Fluid Volume ◽

Suction Pressure ◽

Air Leak ◽

Air Leaks ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Chest Tube Removal ◽

Pressure Suction

Abstract Purpose: The aim was to investigate the most effective suction pressure for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative data of 242 patients who were monitored with a digital drainage system after pulmonary resection between December 2017 and June 2020. We divided the patients into 3 of group by suction pressure, A (Low-pressure suction group: -5 cm H₂O), B (Intermediate-pressure group: -10 cm H₂O), C (High-pressure suction group: -20 cm H₂O). Duration of air leaks, duration of chest tube replacement, the amount of postoperative air leak, fluid volume drained before chest tube removal, and the maximum amount of air leaks during drainage were evaluated.Results: A total 217 patients were included. In the order of A, B, and C groups, duration of air leaks gradually decreased and significant trend was observed (p=0.019). Duration of chest tube replacement did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.126). The amount of postoperative air leak just after surgery did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.175), however, the amount of postoperative day 1 air leak gradually decreased with statistical significance in order of A, B, and C groups (p=0.033). The maximum amount of air leaks during drainage gradually decreased in order of A, B and C groups (p=0.036). Fluid volume drained before chest tube removal did not significantly differ among the three groups (p=0.986).Conclusion: Low-pressure suction after pulmonary resection would be useful for preventing or promptly improving postoperative air leaks.

Download Full-text

Autologous Blood Pleurodesis: What Is the Optimal Time Interval and Amount of Blood?

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1727129 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Alessio Campisi ◽

Andrea Dell'Amore ◽

Yonghui Zhang ◽

Zhitao Gu ◽

Angelo Paolo Ciarrocchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chest Tube ◽

Autologous Blood ◽

Optimal Time ◽

Time Interval ◽

Air Leak ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Blood Patch ◽

Prolonged Air Leak ◽

Chest Tube Removal

Abstract Background Air leak is the most common complication after lung resection and leads to increased length of hospital (LOH) stay or patient discharge with a chest tube. Management by autologous blood patch pleurodesis (ABPP) is controversial because few studies exist, and the technique has yet to be standardized. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing ABPP for prolonged air leak (PAL) following lobectomy in three centers, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were divided into two groups: Group A, 120 mL of blood infused; Group B, 60 mL. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed, and 23 patients were included in each group. Numbers and success rates of blood patch, time to cessation of air leak, time to chest tube removal, reoperation, LOH, and complications were examined. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables associated with an increased risk of air leak was performed. Results After the PSM, 120 mL of blood is statistically significant in reducing the number of days before chest tube removal after ABPP (2.78 vs. 4.35), LOH after ABPP (3.78 vs. 10.00), and LOH (8.78 vs. 15.17). Complications (0 vs. 4) and hours until air leak cessation (6.83 vs. 3.91, range 1–13) after ABPP were also statistically different (p < 0.05). Air leaks that persisted for up to 13 hours required another ABPP. No patient had re-operation or long-term complications related to pleurodesis. Conclusion In our experience, 120 mL is the optimal amount of blood and the procedure can be repeated every 24 hours with the chest tube clamped.

Download Full-text