scholarly journals Cervical vertebral maturation method and mandibular growth peak: a longitudinal study of diagnostic reliability

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Perinetti ◽  
Jasmina Primozic ◽  
Bhavna Sharma ◽  
Iacopo Cioffi ◽  
Luca Contardo
2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Perinetti ◽  
Luca Contardo ◽  
Attilio Castaldo ◽  
James A. McNamara ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi

ABSTRACT Objective:  To evaluate the capability of both cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) stages 3 and 4 (CS3-4 interval) and the peak in standing height to identify the mandibular growth spurt throughout diagnostic reliability analysis. Materials and Methods:  A previous longitudinal data set derived from 24 untreated growing subjects (15 females and nine males,) detailed elsewhere were reanalyzed. Mandibular growth was defined as annual increments in Condylion (Co)–Gnathion (Gn) (total mandibular length) and Co–Gonion Intersection (Goi) (ramus height) and their arithmetic mean (mean mandibular growth [mMG]). Subsequently, individual annual increments in standing height, Co-Gn, Co-Goi, and mMG were arranged according to annual age intervals, with the first and last intervals defined as 7–8 years and 15–16 years, respectively. An analysis was performed to establish the diagnostic reliability of the CS3-4 interval or the peak in standing height in the identification of the maximum individual increments of each Co-Gn, Co-Goi, and mMG measurement at each annual age interval. Results:  CS3-4 and standing height peak show similar but variable accuracy across annual age intervals, registering values between 0.61 (standing height peak, Co-Gn) and 0.95 (standing height peak and CS3-4, mMG). Generally, satisfactory diagnostic reliability was seen when the mandibular growth spurt was identified on the basis of the Co-Goi and mMG increments. Conclusions:  Both CVM interval CS3-4 and peak in standing height may be used in routine clinical practice to enhance efficiency of treatments requiring identification of the mandibular growth spurt.


2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 665-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Perinetti ◽  
Riccardo Sossi ◽  
Jasmina Primozic ◽  
Gaetano Ierardo ◽  
Luca Contardo

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the diagnostic reliability of mandibular second molar maturation in assessing the mandibular growth peak using a longitudinal design. Materials and Methods: From the files of the Burlington and Oregon growth studies, 40 subjects (20 from each collection, 20 males and 20 females) with at least seven annual lateral cephalograms taken from 9 to 16 years were included. Mandibular second molar maturation was assessed according to Demirjian et al., and mandibular growth was defined as annual increments of Co-Gn distance. A full diagnostic reliability analysis (including positive likelihood ratio) was performed to establish the diagnostic reliability of dental stages E, F, and (pooled) GH in identifying the imminent mandibular growth peak. Results: None of the dental maturation stages reliably identified the mandibular growth peak with greatest overall mean accuracy and positive likelihood ratio of 0.77 (stage F) and 2.7 (stage E), respectively. Conclusions: Use of the mandibular second molar maturation is not recommended for planning treatment requiring identification of the mandibular growth peak.


2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Flores-Mir ◽  
L. Akbarihamed ◽  
B. Nebbe ◽  
G. Heo ◽  
P. W. Major

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Namineni ◽  
Ziauddin Mohammad ◽  
SampathReddy Cheruku ◽  
Sarada Penmetcha ◽  
SurendraReddy Munnangi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
pp. e455-e461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Ball ◽  
Donald Woodside ◽  
Bryan Tompson ◽  
W. Stuart Hunter ◽  
James Posluns

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document