scholarly journals Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines on Sports Cardiology and Exercise in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-549
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 4488
Author(s):  
Antonio Pelliccia ◽  
Sanjay Sharma ◽  
Sabiha Gati ◽  
Maria Bäck ◽  
Mats Börjesson ◽  
...  

The Task Force on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 545
Author(s):  
Antonio Pelliccia ◽  
Sanjay Sharma ◽  
Sabiha Gati ◽  
Maria Bäck ◽  
Mats Börjesson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
Anaya Malik

ADVISING individuals with diseases of the heart on what types and intensities of sport to participate in is not a practice cardiologists typically have official guidelines on. A taskforce from ESC has now come together and created guidelines, the first of their kind, on exercise and sports participation in patients with cardiovascular disease. The guidelines were presented at the ESC Congress 2020 in a session chaired by Prof Antonio Pelliccia, Scientific Director of the Institute of Sports Medicine & Science from Rome, Italy. Pelliccia was joined by Prof Martin Halle, President of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Munich, Germany, and Prof Matthias Wilhem, Head of the Centre for Preventive Cardiology, Sports Medicine, Department of Cardiology at the Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland. The guidelines derived from the need to assist patients who had experienced cardiovascular events and were questioning their limits of sports participation. Prof Halle commented on his experience in the taskforce: “The level of evidence is rather low, so it is very much the personal perspective and the experience of the experts which made us come to that one conclusion in the guidelines. It is something that should be developed in years to come.” A series of videos were shown, presented by specialists who were invited to discuss some of the most relevant topics of the guidelines.


Author(s):  
Araceli Boraita ◽  
Carmen Adamuz ◽  
María Alcocer Ayuga ◽  
Amelia Carro ◽  
Leonel Díaz González ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antonio Pelliccia ◽  
Sanjay Sharma ◽  
Sabiha Gati ◽  
Maria Bäck ◽  
Mats Börjesson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Fitzsimons ◽  
Janina Stępińska ◽  
Mary Kerins ◽  
Massimo F Piepoli ◽  
Loreena Hill ◽  
...  

Introduction: Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is a significant clinical challenge and despite European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines, evidence confirms sub-optimal patient care. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate ESC members’ opinions on the current provision of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation services across Europe and explore barriers to guideline implementation. Method: Electronic surveys using a secure web link were sent to members of the ESC in eight purposively selected ESC affiliated countries. Results: A total of 479 professionals completed the survey, of whom 67% were cardiologists, 8.6% general physicians, 8.2% nurses and 16.2% other healthcare professionals. Respondents were predominantly (91%) practising clinicians, generally highly motivated regarding cardiovascular disease prevention, but most reported that secondary prevention in their country was sub-optimal. The main barriers to prevention were lack of available cardiac rehabilitation programmes and long-term follow-up, patients’ disease perception and professional attitudes towards prevention. While knowledge of the prevention guidelines was generally good, practices such as motivational counselling and better educational tools were called for to promote exercise, smoking cessation and for nutritional aspects. Conclusions: The provision of services focusing on the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease varies greatly across Europe. Furthermore, despite ESC Guidelines and a strong evidence base supporting the efficacy of secondary prevention, the infrastructure and co-ordination of such care is lacking. In addition patient motivation is considered poor and some professionals remain unconvinced about the merits of prevention. The disappointing results outlined in this survey emphasise that improved tools are urgently required to educate both patients and professionals and confirm the priority of cardiovascular prevention internationally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document